Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(26,914 posts)

23. Uh, oh. I guess constantly monitoring?

Fri Apr 3, 2026, 02:39 PM

Friday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FINALLY, Thank you Nancy Pelosi [View all] 4bonhoffer Apr 1 OP

This thread is wrong gab13by13 Apr 1 #1

Agreed bamagal62 Apr 1 #2

If you mean they already cheat I agree. 58Sunliner Apr 1 #4

So did Clinton. And FoxNewsSucks Apr 1 #6

They're going to cheat their asses off..... SergeStorms Apr 1 #5

REC a thousand times. Amaryllis Apr 1 #9

The more people who vote,... SpankMe Apr 1 #11

Did they try it in 2020? Qutzupalotl Apr 1 #12

No, for two reasons. BComplex Apr 1 #13

There's hand counting paper ballots in full public view questionseverything Apr 1 #15

Can white hat hackers detect this kind of malevolent intent? electric_blue68 Thursday #17

Uh, oh. I guess constantly monitoring? electric_blue68 Friday #23

That's what I want to know. littlemissmartypants Thursday #16

My understanding of the way hacking works... returnee Apr 1 #14

Except when all the evidence points to the election being accurate EdmondDantes_ Friday #21