Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,602 posts)
9. More from the article:
Tue Apr 14, 2026, 12:00 PM
6 hrs ago

snip

The Prospect contacted all members of the leadership of the CBC and Rep. Meeks to seek comment on the decision to support a clean reauthorization of Section 702. None of them responded before press time. Hours after press time, Rep. Meeks responded, claiming that “I support FISA reauthorization, but the only vote I’ve been whipping is my War Powers Resolution to end the war in Iran. Whip operations are traditionally conducted by the Ranking Member of the committee that has jurisdiction over the legislation being considered. Any claim that I’m whipping the CBC on FISA is false.”

The story does not say that Rep. Meeks is whipping a vote, as that has a specific meaning in the context of Congress. It says that he convinced the CBC to support a clean reauthorization. That reporting has gone unchallenged.

snip

So influential are the intelligence agencies that rely on Section 702 that they have managed to cow a long-standing reformist, CBC chairwoman Yvette Clarke (D-NY).

In 2010, Clarke opposed Section 702 on the grounds that renewal of the act would create “a precedent under which we will see the creation of a system that uses the private sector as a de facto spying agency for the government.” Since 2010, Clarke has consistently voted to pass broad reforms restricting Section 702’s reach, and voted against reauthorizing the power the last time it came before Congress in 2024.

snip

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congressional Black Caucu...»Reply #9