Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cirsium

(4,147 posts)
30. Not Common Cause
Wed Apr 29, 2026, 12:44 PM
Apr 29

Last edited Wed Apr 29, 2026, 04:13 PM - Edit history (2)

The Common Coalition - whoever that is. If it is Adam Zarnowski, who puts out This Will Hold, there are some questions about motives and credibility.

This Will Hold is a pseudonymous Substack publication launched by an author known only as “@thiswillhold,” who claims their previous Twitter/X account was banned after a viral election thread. The publication is tied to a broader investigative project called The Common Coalition Report, which frames itself as a watchdog of election manipulation and technocratic overreach. The publication blends journalism, activism, and speculative analysis.

The site is reader-supported, with both free and paid subscriptions on Substack. It does not run ads or receive institutional backing. The author(s) operate anonymously, with no visible bylines or credentials beyond association with The Common Coalition. This lack of transparency in identity limits accountability, although the platform itself discloses no outside funding or political affiliation.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/this-will-hold-bias-and-credibility/

According to the article, a person named Adam Zarnowski, who was identified as an ex-CIA agent, alleged that he was "personally involved in an NSA-authorized forensic audit of the 2024 election." That audit supposedly revealed that Harris won the 2024 presidential election "by a wide margin" while Trump "lost dramatically," Zarnowski was quoted as saying.

According to Zarnowski's Substack bio and LinkedIn profile, he has worked on cases involving human trafficking, sexual assault, domestic violence and crimes against children for organizations that aren't affiliated with the federal government.

Both his bio and the Substack article also listed him as the author of a book titled "Jӧrmungandr: A Study in Global Human Trafficking." The Substack article suggested that Zarnowski's book detailed allegations of election fraud. However, Snopes didn't find any evidence to support that claim.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/08/04/harris-nsa-audit-2024-election/

A recent entry is a manifesto by Adam Zarnowski, an individual styling himself as a former CIA paramilitary officer. His post, “‘Unleash Hell’: Pulling up the dragnet,” and its companion e-book are not a disclosure, but a performance—a Live Action Role Play of whistleblowing that demonstrates key techniques of modern disinformation.

The document is a dizzying Gish Gallop through nearly every major geopolitical event and conspiracy theory of the last decade. In Zarnowski’s telling, the 2024 election was stolen by a "junta," Russia and Israel are in a secret alliance to start World War III, Havana Syndrome is linked to COVID-19, and all of it connects back to Jeffrey Epstein, QAnon, and a Mormon polygamist cult in Utah. This isn’t analysis; it’s a work of weaponized apophenia, the cognitive bias of seeing connections in unrelated data, marshaled here to construct an all-encompassing theory of global intrigue.

By braiding dozens of disparate threads together, Zarnowski makes his central claim functionally unfalsifiable. To debunk it, one would have to disprove not one but a hundred assertions, from the technical details of a supposed “quantum crypto algorithm” (???) used to rig elections to the backroom dealings of Mossad and the FSB. This is a classic disinformation tactic: to create a winding narrative so vast and convoluted that any single point of refutation can be dismissed as missing the “bigger picture.”

...

Zarnowski has produced not a work of investigative journalism, but a piece of political mythology. It offers a simple, all-encompassing explanation for a world that feels chaotic and out of control. It assures the reader that everything is connected, that a secret history exists, and that they, the reader, are now among the initiated. While the narrative is powerful, it is ultimately obviously a work of fiction.
An attempt to vet the author himself through open-source intelligence (OSINT) reveals a public persona that is not just thin, but a transparent effort at strategic credentialing and reputation laundering. While "Paramilitary Operations Officer" is a legitimate, if highly specialized, role within the CIA, Zarnowski’s LinkedIn profile is a constructed identity designed to create an aura of authority. It features a scattergun approach to credentials, from an online ministry ordination to recently acquired financial licenses (Series 7, 63) that are entirely disconnected from his stated expertise in human trafficking.

https://substack.com/inbox/post/170417588

On edit - excerpt from questionable source removed. Thanks, questionseverything.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

yes, and also add those who voted third party to that list. lostincalifornia Apr 29 #1
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #5
Did DNC Ken Martin ever release the 2024 autopsy? leftstreet Apr 29 #2
Did you not see the 'Boycott Harris' rallies in Michigan? RandySF Apr 29 #3
Yes, I vaguely remember leftstreet Apr 29 #7
Maybe they are analyzing it privately SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #4
The autopsy/analysis was done but not made public. AloeVera Apr 29 #18
They have no obligation to make it public SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #21
Except it was promised to be released. AloeVera Apr 29 #35
One person promised, big deal SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #37
The consultants muddied the waters... haele Apr 29 #25
I think you're right. yardwork Apr 29 #27
Well put. sop Apr 29 #31
Precisely the problem with U.S. democracy, already handicapped by the antiquated electoral college etc and now... AloeVera Apr 29 #38
My guess is that no one outside the DNC will ever see it Rob H. Apr 29 #15
The old "looking forward, not back" excuse has worked out SO well in the past. /s AloeVera Apr 29 #19
They're gonna pull out all the stops to protect anyone from accountability Rob H. Apr 29 #39
Inquiring minds want to know, yellow dahlia Apr 30 #40
Blaming Democrats for something that didn't happen. gab13by13 Apr 29 #6
100% right Botany Apr 29 #11
I hadn't seen this report from common cause, ty for posting questionseverything Apr 29 #14
Not Common Cause Cirsium Apr 29 #30
Lotta gobbledygook there, checked your latest comments and saw you don't think there's really an Epstein conspiracy questionseverything Apr 29 #32
On edit Cirsium Apr 29 #34
Red Herrings are tasty Botany Apr 30 #44
I am suggesting caution Cirsium Apr 30 #45
And the idea that people came out and voted down ballot, but not for Dem prez - yellow dahlia Apr 30 #42
Yup! Botany Apr 30 #43
Sing it, sister! yellow dahlia Apr 30 #41
right and wrong RANDYWILDMAN Apr 29 #8
Yes it is MustLoveBeagles Apr 29 #9
When what happens? What is being referenced here? W_HAMILTON Apr 29 #10
In national polls, Democrats do just as bad as CivicGrief Apr 29 #12
The sign on the Presidential tree-house said get the red out Apr 29 #13
Ha! He-man women haters club. CivicGrief Apr 29 #17
Post removed Post removed Apr 29 #16
And yet the Church of Both Sides of Latter-day Progressive Saints is still around. betsuni Apr 29 #20
I'll try to respond to this later tonight or on the weekend nt gulliver Apr 29 #22
Facts Aepps22 Apr 29 #23
More people voted AGAINST trump than for him in 2024 krawhitham Apr 29 #24
It is easy to blame someone else for the ills the coutry faces... cayugafalls Apr 29 #26
And to not vote for women Pris Apr 29 #28
It also happens when shady think tanks like Heritage and Federalist are allowed to nominate justices. Initech Apr 29 #29
I understand the sentiment angrychair Apr 29 #33
I dont think it was progressives that didnt show up quakerboy Apr 29 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is what happens to w...»Reply #30