Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(151,586 posts)
53. Exactly.
Thu May 14, 2026, 05:11 PM
May 14

Personally, in 1995, I created an experimental little app for Windows. Called FLAMER. It was a satirical AI engine. What it did was read in messages from discussion sites

Then. It looked for keywords in a specific database It held in memory.. That database was large, but fixed. I populated the data, or it could be loaded from a file.

Next, it wrote a reply to the message it had read in. The reply specifically insulted the writer of the message. That used a language module that selected the words, phrases, and structures stored in a language database, also loaded from a file. A small language model, but large enough. That, too, was flexible and new files could be created.

For speed, all data was stored in memory in matrices.

Finally, a randomized insulting reply was generated from the SLM, and could be pasted into the thread by the user. Internal checking prevented duplications and so on.

Did it work? Pretty well. Well enough that the temporary users I used to experiment were often banned from the forums I used for testing. It was a joke program. A venture into AI.
I got bored, though, so I released the coding into the public domain.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There is unquestionably a bubble in the sector... Moostache May 14 #1
Yup. MineralMan May 14 #2
Yeah, try calling the IRS... bobalew May 14 #60
It Also Seems To Presume... ProfessorGAC May 14 #4
This is the most nefarious part Diraven May 14 #40
Dot.com bubble on steroids North Coast Lawyer May 15 #91
Everybody I know is somewhat skeptical/uncomfortable engaging with it.... Ars Longa May 14 #3
A very expensive, society-wrecking solution looking for a problem. Midnight Writer May 14 #5
Their only path to profitability is evil Diraven May 14 #47
I happen to love that statement. OldBaldy1701E May 15 #64
Terrific way to put it! calimary May 15 #92
Good advice. As an IT person, I trust you far more than many others sprouting this nonsense about AI etc. It SWBTATTReg May 14 #6
Drive thru fast food places like Rally's have AI taking orders.............. Lovie777 May 14 #7
"Hello. Will you be using your McDonald's ;membership today?" 3Hotdogs May 14 #10
TY TY TY Katcat May 14 #20
No. The Madcap May 14 #26
It is fast. It used to be cheap. Swede May 15 #66
I think it's more fundamental than that sab390 May 14 #8
No doubt. I don't know what happens. MineralMan May 14 #14
Agree, AI is a tool, not a solution. IzzaNuDay May 14 #9
Disagree. yowzayowzayowza May 14 #11
Thanks. I understand the technology, MineralMan May 14 #17
The dot com bubble didnt kill the internet any more than this one will kill AI. yowzayowzayowza May 14 #18
It didn't kill, but it screwed up the economy big time for a while. MineralMan May 14 #23
It's a relatively new technology oldmanlynn May 15 #84
I so hope you are right! ShazzieB May 14 #12
I agree with you, but I do it coming from a different angle. slightlv May 14 #22
I hate AI PCB66 May 14 #13
'that we will all benefit from'?? notinkansas May 14 #19
I think all the issues you quoted PCB66 May 14 #49
No. The world population is not the focus here. notinkansas May 14 #56
I think humans are learning faster than AI: for example, many of us can now recognize AI fake pics /videos very quickly. C Moon May 14 #15
Man, I hope your right. My techi relative thinks it's gonna take over the world Joinfortmill May 14 #16
Well, you have to admit they are trying, for sure. ananda May 14 #37
Most bubbles burst... that's all. MiHale May 14 #21
Ed Zitron's done some of the best writing on this flawed, heavily subsidized tech and the bubble it's created. highplainsdem May 14 #24
The way I see it, AI's most prominent role infullview May 14 #25
My son in college just shrugs and says it's a tool - TBF May 14 #27
I think you may overestimate what businesses really think about CSAT Bristlecone May 14 #28
It will bankrupt the entire country bucolic_frolic May 14 #29
It will kill a few hundred people before that and have bobalew May 14 #54
I watched a couple of videos today Racygrandma May 14 #30
Yes, saw that on FB... buzzycrumbhunger May 14 #48
No worries about noise. When data centers gobble up all the water and farmers can't irrigate fields Attilatheblond May 14 #50
I am in KS we are in a drought Racygrandma May 14 #59
I am in southern part of AZ. And idiot county officials STILL promote data centers Attilatheblond May 14 #61
Used to live in 'wheat country' in Montana. Drought there too. Attilatheblond May 14 #62
And in the meantime, deafness has its advantages! Sweet Rosie Red May 15 #68
You could read the same analysis as this post SCantiGOP May 14 #31
I also think that AI will end up being a bust LetMyPeopleVote May 14 #32
I agree with you on that..................... Lovie777 May 14 #34
That's on them for trying to take shortcuts without due diligence MichMan May 15 #76
If you are in the market at all, perhaps consider XMAG ETF pat_k May 14 #33
As I have said elsewhere this looks exactly like the excessive speculation I saw when the internet was ramping up Ford_Prefect May 14 #35
Exactly. MineralMan May 14 #53
Thomas Edison new well the potential of new technology even in the face of its opposition. Ol Janx Spirit May 14 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author Prairie_Seagull May 14 #38
Nope NoRethugFriends May 14 #39
Good analysis and explanation. MineralMan May 14 #42
Thank you. NoRethugFriends May 14 #58
Perhaps some people do not use AI effectively ThreeNoSeep May 14 #41
Most people don't use it at all. MineralMan May 14 #45
Correction ThreeNoSeep May 14 #51
When people say they do not use AI are wrong. What they mean is that they are being "used" by AI. efhmc May 15 #81
We fear what we don't understand RoseTrellis May 14 #43
LOL! MineralMan May 14 #44
If your 401K has a stock component, you're likely exposed to AI stocks nitpicked May 14 #46
I think that the real commercial purpose of AI Klarkashton May 14 #52
I've posted a link to this analysis before .... eppur_se_muova May 14 #55
Totally agree that baloon is about to pop CanonRay May 14 #57
Is AI going away? lonely bird May 15 #63
"Let Grandma Die for the DOW" Ruby the Liberal May 15 #65
I agree! Sweet Rosie Red May 15 #67
Like most DU predictions, this one should be taken with a grain of salt. onenote May 15 #69
OK. That should go without sayiing. MineralMan May 15 #71
Very bad advice to advocate against the AI trade in the stock market flamingdem May 15 #87
I think you're 100% correct. Greybnk48 May 15 #70
Wishful ludditic thinking Sympthsical May 15 #72
LOL! MineralMan May 15 #73
I did get a chuckle Sympthsical May 15 #74
Agree Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 15 #75
100% Blue Full Moon May 15 #77
AI failure in customer service is a feature, not a bug. Bobstandard May 15 #78
Kevin O'Leary is involved in a number of the proposed large data centres Bev54 May 15 #79
There will always be bad actors who will use AI louis-t May 15 #80
The Gartner Hype Cycle is undefeated. usonian May 15 #82
Article from a British tech magazine that you should see: highplainsdem May 15 #83
Paul Krugman and many others have made the same prediction. Martin68 May 15 #85
Sorry, don't agree flamingdem May 15 #86
I thnk you are right, esp since it wasn't a real "hit" to start with. In some apps, it might be good, but not for human Exp May 15 #88
That's with the models they've released publicly. Jedi Guy May 15 #89
We can only hope. And I hope you are right on this MM! KPN May 15 #90
The Agentic Economy Celerity Monday #93
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm Going to Make a Huge ...»Reply #53