Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(13,986 posts)

4. Nope. Read the article.

Wed Jan 9, 2013, 05:06 PM

Jan 2013

He completed a program that cleared his record. Background check would have come up with bupkis.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon" history and this guy was given a job with a gun [View all] rainbow4321 Jan 2013 OP

More guns! mr_hat Jan 2013 #1

a flaw appears in the "good guy with gun / bad guy with gun" theory Enrique Jan 2013 #2

Clear system failure ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #3

Nope. Read the article. riqster Jan 2013 #4

Why would aggravated assault WITH A DEALDLY WEAPON TXDemoGal Jan 2013 #5

Isn't 'aggravated assault' kinda redundant? Rex Jan 2013 #7