Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,263 posts)
10. I'm glad they're spending serious money on a marketing campaign, because
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 05:43 AM
Jan 2013

the success of the first year will be critical to the success of the whole program.

If large numbers of people don't enroll simply because they're not aware of their options, or of how the insurance plans will work, then the ACA is doomed to fail. And the next step wouldn't be Medicare for all, the Dems pipe dream. We'd just be going back to the old status quo, with the insurance companies free to price gauge and deny coverage to anyone they want.

But marketing isn't all they're going to be doing with that money. From the link at the OP:

"At an exchange board meeting in Los Angeles on Thursday, consumer advocates and community activists urged officials to offer information in multiple languages and to make online enrollment as simple as possible.

SNIP

"The exchange also has the task of helping millions of Californians determine whether they qualify for an expansion of Medi-Cal, the state's Medicaid program for the poor, or federally
subsidized private coverage. Families earning up to $93,000 annually may qualify for premium subsidies.

"Next week, health insurers and other companies must submit their initial bids to sell coverage in the exchange. Bidders will provide proposed rates by the end of March, and the exchange expects to select health plans in June.

"In addition to marketing, Covered California will use the federal grant money
to help fund operations through January 2015, when the online marketplace will rely on fees assessed on health policies sold through the exchange."

SNIP



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Just think how little 674 million is in relation to healthcare madville Jan 2013 #1
The committees organizing the exchanges will have the expertise-- eridani Jan 2013 #2
State-based single-payer is the way forward Chathamization Jan 2013 #21
The subsidies seem pretty good - that is if you don't make too much in salary flamingdem Jan 2013 #3
The subsidies are for the insurance companies, not for health care eridani Jan 2013 #4
but they can't keep more than 15-20% of premiums CreekDog Jan 2013 #5
That will not stop them from denying claims eridani Jan 2013 #7
Wrong, it's not PNUP CreekDog Jan 2013 #6
Link eridani Jan 2013 #8
i don't know why you misnamed the organization and left out the link CreekDog Jan 2013 #9
I'm glad they're spending serious money on a marketing campaign, because pnwmom Jan 2013 #10
thanks for the info pnwmom! n/t flamingdem Jan 2013 #11
I'd rather they spent serious money on actual heatlh care eridani Jan 2013 #12
No, for the first time they must limit administrative costs, pnwmom Jan 2013 #13
They are absolutely free to deny claims eridani Jan 2013 #14
They tried, but failed, to stretch the definition of medical services pnwmom Jan 2013 #15
They are busy redefining "administrative costs" right now eridani Jan 2013 #16
Claims denial may be legal, but if it isn't upheld it won't serve any purpose pnwmom Jan 2013 #17
The insurers do not have to give a shit what customers think of them, as they are de facto eridani Jan 2013 #18
Did you forget that people will also have access to at least two federal options? pnwmom Jan 2013 #19
After they have been bankrupted? Not useful n/t eridani Jan 2013 #20
The first appeal must take place within 72 hours. Why are you so certain pnwmom Jan 2013 #22
That is a huge joke. Google Nataline Sarkisian eridani Jan 2013 #23
A major difference in Obamacare vs. Romneycare is that Obamacare pnwmom Jan 2013 #24
True, but neither piece of legislation addresses claims denial eridani Jan 2013 #25
You say, "true," but act as if that isn't even a significant point. pnwmom Jan 2013 #26
Their motivation would be that they have to deal with a huge backlog of cases eridani Jan 2013 #27
You're just speculating. There is no huge backlog of cases because pnwmom Jan 2013 #28
No speculation at all. The behavior of insurance companies w respect to paying claims is well known eridani Jan 2013 #29
Their past behavior is not predictive in this case, because until now pnwmom Jan 2013 #30
I find your faith in insurance companies.....disturbing eridani Jan 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CA health insurance excha...»Reply #10