General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Women try to get recourse for revenge porn photo posts [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your alert
At Fri Jan 25, 2013, 07:26 PM you sent an alert on the following post:
Our most respected actresses get naked and win Academy Awards
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2259016
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
YOUR COMMENTS:
Poster is defending men's right to put a naked picture of a woman on the net against her will. This is misogyny.
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Fri Jan 25, 2013, 07:31 PM, and voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Is BFK still here? I thought they'd been banned already.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: A woman getting paid to show her bits on screen is not the same fucking thing...
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: Childish flame-bait designed to derail the thread, and a poorly constructed out one at that. Vote to "Hide" for general immaturity and lack of creative effort.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The post is stupid, absurd and illogical, but I don't see it as a violation of the rules of this forum.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given