Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Minimum of 140 children killed, and minimum 920 civilians killed overall. [View all]polly7
(20,582 posts)46. I did respond.
Wtf are you to decide someone doesn't 'care' about killing innocents? I think you've pretty much outed yourself as being one that DOESN'T care ... it's obvious that trying so hard to make this all about hating President Obama and not the drones and the policies for using them, is about as shallow and pathetic as it gets and transparent as hell, imo.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
153 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Minimum of 140 children killed, and minimum 920 civilians killed overall. [View all]
MadHound
Feb 2013
OP
My point is that we are not serving the ends of 'empire' by taking sides in a civil war.
randome
Feb 2013
#22
And just imagine Mitt Romney or John McCain getting their hands on all of it!
Fire Walk With Me
Feb 2013
#3
If a drone target is NOT legitimate it has ways of shutting the whole thing down
Demo_Chris
Feb 2013
#5
Don't you know that by requesting actual facts, you've obviously lost your "moral compass"??....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#95
And you try to be as insulting as possible to posters who don't agree with you.....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#132
LOL. None of what I've said to you could possibly be misconstrued as being insulting....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#140
Good effort, but the person to whom you are responding isnt interested in the truth
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#25
But did we start 173 threads on the subject of, say, an accidental shooting of civilians with a gun?
randome
Feb 2013
#33
Now we are getting somewhere. You think the majority of DUers and Democrats are bad people
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#50
The OP has a track record that is well known, and there for anyone to check.
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#64
That's exactly what I thought. You know I am right and that's why you dare not go that route
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#48
LOL -You've admitted that 95% or more of your OPs here are anti-Obama. That is bias, pure and simple
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#149
So, take me up on my challenge. I think that 95% or more of your OPs where Obama or the admin are
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#60
I do not agree that our disagreement is over the issues. I think you have another agenda.
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#93
There are plenty of books and articles out there available to the ordinary person,
MadHound
Feb 2013
#86
It needs to be repeated because so many continue to believe it's not a war crime.
Octafish
Feb 2013
#29
And again and again you've been told that Pakistan condemns these drone attacks on their soil,
MadHound
Feb 2013
#126
In other words, you are admitting that we are violating those nations' soveignty.
MadHound
Feb 2013
#125
Well, first of all I'd like to see the evidence that all Presidents are so guilty,
MadHound
Feb 2013
#19
Are you ready to condemn Clinton for bombing Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, and Serbia?
baldguy
Feb 2013
#20
"How many people from other countries are over here in NA killing Americans?".....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#40
+100. Some DU posters seem to have forgotten those salient facts in their rush....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#31
Name one that doesn't involve putting US troops in harm's way, or uses weapons....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#42
Answer the question please, and please try to skip the labels and name-calling. nt.
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#45
They can't. There is no response to that. They prefer to go on calling the President, the
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#53
Just to be completely clear on this issue, here is your original statement:....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#82
You made the claim that there were other methods that could be used besides drone attacks....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#90
Answer the question, please. What other alternative do you believe we can use....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#104
Just answer the question and I'll stop asking it. See how simple that is? nt.
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#135
Sure. Civilian deaths due to 'friendly fire' NEVER occurred before the invention of drones.
randome
Feb 2013
#76
Well, the number of dead innocents, the amount of destruction left behind, belies your assertion.
MadHound
Feb 2013
#89
The US relationship with Pakistan has always been an up-and-down affair. nt.
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#79
The other board must be FR, because I've never seen anything like that on DU....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#99
Why don't you folks understand that these powers won't be limited to Saint Obama?
whatchamacallit
Feb 2013
#112
I think most of us agree there need to be formal reviews of targeted killings.
randome
Feb 2013
#114