Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Minimum of 140 children killed, and minimum 920 civilians killed overall. [View all]MadHound
(34,179 posts)63. Perhaps we should consult with Mossad,
They seem perfectly capable of carrying out such missions.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
153 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Minimum of 140 children killed, and minimum 920 civilians killed overall. [View all]
MadHound
Feb 2013
OP
My point is that we are not serving the ends of 'empire' by taking sides in a civil war.
randome
Feb 2013
#22
And just imagine Mitt Romney or John McCain getting their hands on all of it!
Fire Walk With Me
Feb 2013
#3
If a drone target is NOT legitimate it has ways of shutting the whole thing down
Demo_Chris
Feb 2013
#5
Don't you know that by requesting actual facts, you've obviously lost your "moral compass"??....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#95
And you try to be as insulting as possible to posters who don't agree with you.....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#132
LOL. None of what I've said to you could possibly be misconstrued as being insulting....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#140
Good effort, but the person to whom you are responding isnt interested in the truth
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#25
But did we start 173 threads on the subject of, say, an accidental shooting of civilians with a gun?
randome
Feb 2013
#33
Now we are getting somewhere. You think the majority of DUers and Democrats are bad people
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#50
The OP has a track record that is well known, and there for anyone to check.
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#64
That's exactly what I thought. You know I am right and that's why you dare not go that route
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#48
LOL -You've admitted that 95% or more of your OPs here are anti-Obama. That is bias, pure and simple
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#149
So, take me up on my challenge. I think that 95% or more of your OPs where Obama or the admin are
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#60
I do not agree that our disagreement is over the issues. I think you have another agenda.
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#93
There are plenty of books and articles out there available to the ordinary person,
MadHound
Feb 2013
#86
It needs to be repeated because so many continue to believe it's not a war crime.
Octafish
Feb 2013
#29
And again and again you've been told that Pakistan condemns these drone attacks on their soil,
MadHound
Feb 2013
#126
In other words, you are admitting that we are violating those nations' soveignty.
MadHound
Feb 2013
#125
Well, first of all I'd like to see the evidence that all Presidents are so guilty,
MadHound
Feb 2013
#19
Are you ready to condemn Clinton for bombing Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, and Serbia?
baldguy
Feb 2013
#20
"How many people from other countries are over here in NA killing Americans?".....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#40
+100. Some DU posters seem to have forgotten those salient facts in their rush....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#31
Name one that doesn't involve putting US troops in harm's way, or uses weapons....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#42
Answer the question please, and please try to skip the labels and name-calling. nt.
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#45
They can't. There is no response to that. They prefer to go on calling the President, the
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#53
Just to be completely clear on this issue, here is your original statement:....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#82
You made the claim that there were other methods that could be used besides drone attacks....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#90
Answer the question, please. What other alternative do you believe we can use....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#104
Just answer the question and I'll stop asking it. See how simple that is? nt.
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#135
Sure. Civilian deaths due to 'friendly fire' NEVER occurred before the invention of drones.
randome
Feb 2013
#76
Well, the number of dead innocents, the amount of destruction left behind, belies your assertion.
MadHound
Feb 2013
#89
The US relationship with Pakistan has always been an up-and-down affair. nt.
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#79
The other board must be FR, because I've never seen anything like that on DU....
OldDem2012
Feb 2013
#99
Why don't you folks understand that these powers won't be limited to Saint Obama?
whatchamacallit
Feb 2013
#112
I think most of us agree there need to be formal reviews of targeted killings.
randome
Feb 2013
#114