Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
8. Well, someone owns those houses and is trying to sell them.
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 08:18 AM
Mar 2013

Last edited Fri Mar 29, 2013, 05:04 PM - Edit history (1)

The govt confiscates enough property "for the common good." I don't want them to confiscate more.

Besides, even if a house were given to someone unemployed and homeless, they wouldn't have the funds to maintain it and the yard and pay taxes.

If I own a house and am trying to sell it, I don't think the govt should confiscate it, if I haven't been able to sell it in within 6 mos. When I bought my house years ago, it had been on the market for 18 mos.

The houses will sell. The banks have the funds to maintain the yards, pay the taxes, etc., and try to actively sell them. I found when I was trying to sell my condo years ago that I had trouble....I worked all day, so wasn't available to take calls like I should or show it during the week, etc.

The main thing to help those w/o shelter is to try to improve the jobs situation and maybe enlarge shelters, if that's possible. I don't have the answer to the homeless problem. I don't think anyone does. But to take others' houses because they haven't sold fast enough...that's not the answer.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More Than 300,000 U.S. Ho...»Reply #8