General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is Extreme Wealth Inequality: How Does One Fix This? [View all]Igel
(37,455 posts)Depends how you define "social mobility."
If you define it in terms of percentiles, sure. If you always remove the top 5% every 40 years, by definition you always get a new top 5% every 40 years.
If you define it in terms of household wealth, I'm not sure how getting rid of those with wealth over $10 million will suddenly allow that new 5% to have household wealth of over $10 million. I'm not sure how the current crop of households with net wealth over $10 million prevent new entrants to the "club."
Oddly, I really don't care what percentile I'm in. Never have. Whether it's class rank, the SAT, GRE, LSAT or personal/household income or wealth, how I stack up against others has never really interested me. (It's only been of concern when *others* want to compare me to others--when applying to grad school or law school, for instance.) I could be in a destitute, hole-in-the-ground country with a pittance for wages and be in the top 15% or be in the US where being in the middle 5% gives me a tolerable house, entertainment, food, and lifestyle and I'd choose being in the 47.5-52.5% range instead of the top 15%.