General Discussion

avebury

(11,197 posts)

59. Even if the move the federal trial,

Fri Apr 26, 2013, 07:04 AM

Apr 2013

if the feds somehow manage to get only life in prison with no chance of parole (yes I know that possibility is extremely slim) I would not put it past Mass to want to find a way to hold their own trial. Oklahoma had their own trial for Terry Nichols (despite the fact that he will live the rest of his life in prison). The Oklahoma trial really didn't change anything except to waste a lot of taxpayer money.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Once Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was read his rights on Monday, he immediately stopped talking [View all] dkf Apr 2013 OP

Oh come on davidpdx Apr 2013 #1

He doesn't have to say a word. There's enough video MADem Apr 2013 #2

+1 magellan Apr 2013 #7

It's his right as an American citizen to remain silent. Cali_Democrat Apr 2013 #3

Yes, it is. And now it is time to move forward HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #42

Preumably his lawyers would've told him to stop talking/writing. dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #4

But he didn't have a lawyer yet right? dkf Apr 2013 #5

Probably appointed dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #6

He has some of the best lawyers taxpayer money can buy. MADem Apr 2013 #9

I know a little John2 Apr 2013 #12

Not All Lawyers Are The Same... KharmaTrain Apr 2013 #18

His father can't help him except by providing moral support--if he's even capable of that. MADem Apr 2013 #21

What are the odds a deal would be offered? LiberalAndProud Apr 2013 #39

My sense is a deal would be in the best interests of everyone. MADem Apr 2013 #54

Rehabilitation? BeyondGeography Apr 2013 #28

You seem to be less than satisfied with how the system is set up. 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2013 #38

I am not sure what you mean. MADem Apr 2013 #55

Richard Reid is in supermax for life. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #61

If "the banks" were trying to murder people with underwear or shoe bombs, or MADem Apr 2013 #62

don't look at me.... dtom67 Apr 2013 #8

Yeah, I'm against Carmen Miranda rights, too. tclambert Apr 2013 #11

Do the crime, do the time! Now dance with your chicky chicky boom! Heather MC Apr 2013 #17

Now dont be too hasty. Forcing a suspect to wear a fruit hat in prison can get you a confession rhett o rick Apr 2013 #19

What if fruit isn't readily available? A vegetable hat maybe? Would that suffice? bowens43 Apr 2013 #26

He has a right to a hat decorated with fruit, including tropical fruit, and at least three colors anneboleyn Apr 2013 #33

I'm still trying to figure out this "trial balloon" thing. Buns_of_Fire Apr 2013 #56

I think his goose is pretty well cooked based on what he's already told them, video footage, spicegal Apr 2013 #10

If it does "matter in court" it can only help convict him. freedom fighter jh Apr 2013 #13

sort of but not exactly onenote Apr 2013 #16

The real fight and focus of his defense team will be avebury Apr 2013 #14

He won't be offered a plea and the prosecutors will not Vinnie From Indy Apr 2013 #53

Yes, the defense will get their change of venue if they want it. Buns_of_Fire Apr 2013 #57

Even if the move the federal trial, avebury Apr 2013 #59

"Rights are not rights if you can just take 'em away Fearless Apr 2013 #15

^^ Fearless, for the win ^^ Myrina Apr 2013 #20

His rights are still intact Prism Apr 2013 #22

I was critiquing the idea that is floating around the MSM Fearless Apr 2013 #23

Oh, yeah, we agree 100% Prism Apr 2013 #25

No, he was deprived JimDandy Apr 2013 #34

He has the right to request an attorney. Prism Apr 2013 #35

How is he to know that unless JimDandy Apr 2013 #37

Exactly. Prism Apr 2013 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author Moondog Apr 2013 #30

George Carlin on Rights and Privileges Moondog Apr 2013 #31

Miranda doesn't bestow rights. He always had them. nt. Hosnon Apr 2013 #52

The right to an attorney present. Fearless Apr 2013 #58

The defendant has to request an attorney. nt. Hosnon Apr 2013 #60

The defendant needs to know he's allowed one. Fearless Apr 2013 #63

I say wait and see gvstn Apr 2013 #24

Then he definitely JimDandy Apr 2013 #36

A good defense lawyer gvstn Apr 2013 #48

Not really feeling the outrage for this one, unlike many. (nt) Posteritatis Apr 2013 #27

After talking for "16 hours"..... louis-t Apr 2013 #29

You won't hear another word from Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Life Long Dem Apr 2013 #32

As is his right. opiate69 Apr 2013 #41

I suspect your point is he should have been charged Kingofalldems Apr 2013 #43

No, I think this was a successful move and wonder if it will be duplicated. dkf Apr 2013 #44

So you don't think he should have been charged as an enemy combatant? Cali_Democrat Apr 2013 #45

I never felt strongly either way about the enemy combatant. dkf Apr 2013 #46

Most Americans are concerned about safety...and we should be able to question people Cali_Democrat Apr 2013 #47

Yeah that's also what I feel about guns and abortion. Taking away people's rights is sensitive. dkf Apr 2013 #49

Well that's the way it's been for many years. Kingofalldems Apr 2013 #50

Pictures and video are pure hell. As the murderous young punk will find out. nt bluestate10 Apr 2013 #51