Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Crepuscular

(1,068 posts)
5. nope, sorry
Sat May 11, 2013, 08:00 AM
May 2013

the sample pool used in this testing was not a random one, it was self populated. That makes the results highly questionable, in terms of viewing them as representative of the breeds involved as a whole. Sorry, that's the way science works, random sampling means that every potential dog of a specific breed has an equal chance of being included in the sample pool being tested. This test required that owners make an affirmative decision to test their dogs in this process, it was not random at all, in terms of populating the sample pool. Now you can say that these results indicate differences between breeds based on those dogs that the owners decided to have tested but it's a huge stretch to assume that similar results would be found in sampling a truly random population.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ATTS official breed stati...»Reply #5