General Discussion

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)

3. This too, is entirely legal.

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 08:14 PM

Jun 2013

They are international communications. It's time to elect legislators that will change the FISA. This is a debate we should be having and I'm happy we're having it.

I see no reason why they shouldn't need a warrant to retain these communications.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

51 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

ACLU: NSA Retains Purely Domestic Communications Without Warrants, Documents Show [View all] Hissyspit Jun 2013 OP

Set me straight, is the ACLU in the racist category? nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #1

I believe they are currently in the "ratfucker" category Dragonfli Jun 2013 #11

Well it makes sense nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #12

It's getting crowded under the "corporate apologist's" bus. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #28

it's such a stupid smear...ignorant of history nashville_brook Jun 2013 #49

The ACLU never loved him! City Lights Jun 2013 #32

clearly the ACLU is a firebagger organization noiretextatique Jun 2013 #34

I admit, I did not consider that possibility nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #35

welcome noiretextatique Jun 2013 #44

today is a good day to join the ACLU grasswire Jun 2013 #2

isn't that how you get on the watch list? reusrename Jun 2013 #30

apparently we are all already on a watch list. grasswire Jun 2013 #48

This too, is entirely legal. Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #3

"The government also claims the authority to retain Americans' purely domestic communications" morningfog Jun 2013 #17

How can the FOREIGN Intelligence Surveillance Court issue legally issue domestic warrants? Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #36

There were no warrants issued in these cases Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #37

"Technically" Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2013 #39

I agree Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #41

I missed the paragraph which stated "fuck President Obama... Earth_First Jun 2013 #4

The ACLU ProSense Jun 2013 #5

You finally admit they can take content? RobertEarl Jun 2013 #6

So much information is surfacing Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #8

It has ProSense Jun 2013 #10

Are you aware of the protocols that the NSA uses to distinguish between "Foreign" and "Domestic"? bvar22 Jun 2013 #18

Here: ProSense Jun 2013 #20

i have figured why the rumours started that the onion was closing Monkie Jun 2013 #24

As John Oliver says..."a coin toss plus 1%"!!! dkf Jun 2013 #27

Well, there is a caveat Coccydynia Jun 2013 #19

Stop it with the facts and stuff. Some here at DU don't like that. SlimJimmy Jun 2013 #23

Oops. My bad. Coccydynia Jun 2013 #25

I think there is quite a bit of confusion about the order of things, reusrename Jun 2013 #33

You may be correct. Coccydynia Jun 2013 #43

Actually, some of the documents indicate they can also take some JDPriestly Jun 2013 #51

Oh, no, that can't be true. She's quoting Greenwald there, and Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #21

what, no "racism, bigotry, hate, agendas, envy and jealousy"? MisterP Jun 2013 #7

Well, that's ACLU for you. Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #22

Thank you ACLU Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #9

K&R for the ACLU! "far weaker than we imagined they could be" n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #13

k/r marmar Jun 2013 #14

but it's leeeeeeegal!!1 frylock Jun 2013 #15

"purely domestic". that means non-foreign calls. seems excessive. nt limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #16

K&R Solly Mack Jun 2013 #26

Somebody's lying.... kentuck Jun 2013 #29

Good question. Octafish Jun 2013 #40

Kick nt Hissyspit Jun 2013 #31

Why does the ACLU hate us for our freedoms? Rex Jun 2013 #38

+1 nashville_brook Jun 2013 #47

HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #42

We can hear you now. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #45

k and r nashville_brook Jun 2013 #46

Kick...Interesting Info...We Need to KNOW! KoKo Jun 2013 #50