Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gun owners say goodbye to high-capacity magazines at Freedom Shoot (Colorado) [View all]Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)157. .
I understand you worship guns and love to pretend they are instruments of love. That position is delusional. It signals profound cognitive dissidence.
"cognitive dissidence"?
Cognitive -- to think
Dissidence -- to dissent.
I gladly plead guilty.
It is very disingenuous of you to singularly cite the West Bank and then accuse me of cherry-picking statistics to serve a particular argument. Nor does it disprove my contention that the per capita violent death rate of Chicago made being a citizen of the Windy City (must be all the bullets whizzing past) more dangerous than being a US soldier in Iraq. Nor does your article, which lumps drugs and non-gun violent crimes into its statistics, disprove my contention/cognitive dissent.
Some states with strict gun laws are also some of the most gun-violent. Some states with lax gun laws are some of the least gun-violent. Exceptions to both of those statements can be found. The point I'm making is: contrary to your assertion the mere presence of guns does not equal an uptick in gun violence. Guns are not the variable you are looking for. If you have even an ounce of sincerity for the victims you claim to champion perhaps you would serve them better focusing on more viable factors.
And there are other factors in play; factors that are more accessible to society to mitigate violence as a whole and that do not require abrogation of personal rights or political suicide in the pursuit of abrogation of personal rights. Once you mitigate those factors then maybe you could make an honest statement that guns are no longer required for self-defense.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
186 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gun owners say goodbye to high-capacity magazines at Freedom Shoot (Colorado) [View all]
madamesilverspurs
Jun 2013
OP
Doubt it; I explained how that sort behave when confronted in a recent post:
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2013
#13
That one has problems with backing up his claims or admitting when he's wrong.
CokeMachine
Jun 2013
#18
I watched a guy take a 5 round Beowulf and remove a pin to make it a 15 round 50 Beowulf........
rdharma
Jun 2013
#124
Bullshit. Watch the whole thing this time. Read the desc. Or just stop lying.
Lizzie Poppet
Jun 2013
#127
Do you understand what I said in post #142.... or should I provide a picture......
rdharma
Jun 2013
#143
This just in: people disregard laws they consider harmful, pointless, and/or fuckwitted.
Lizzie Poppet
Jun 2013
#61
Nope, but I have been to enough gun stores, gun shows, etc., in my early years to know gun owners
Hoyt
Jun 2013
#102
I could legally get a permit to carry, if I were stupid and paranoid enough to want one.
Hoyt
Jun 2013
#106
Huh. So if someone suggested going over a state line for an abortion would someone alert?
The Straight Story
Jun 2013
#29
Because people are forced at gun point to go to such places? Have you been forced to drink
The Straight Story
Jun 2013
#42
Then let the owner decide and you can decide to take your business to a non-smoking one
The Straight Story
Jun 2013
#48
So then we should probably ban any magazine with a capacity higher than 2.
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2013
#45
Given that there are *billions* of magazines in circulation in the United States,
Rod Walker
Jun 2013
#73
In Switzerland they issue actual honest-to-goodness assault rifles of military quality
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2013
#147
Ammunition, I imagine, is as importable as illicit drugs or any other small-sized commodity.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2013
#159
It is inherently impossible to persuade such virtue with the American gun culture.
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2013
#160
One society deliberately arms its citizens, while the other leaves it to choice
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2013
#161
All Swiss Militia have the rifle, uniform, loaded pack, and a full combat load of rifle ammo
oneshooter
Jun 2013
#164
Sly, in real life, is one of the Brady Center's favorite gun controllers...
Eleanors38
Jun 2013
#122
I think it goes to some people feel powerless and want to leverage a higher power
The Straight Story
Jun 2013
#39
In anticipation of this law (which takes effect tomorrow), I've purchased about 80 normal capacity
Rod Walker
Jun 2013
#60
Oh, the law is completely unenforceable...I'm just a law-abiding sort of guy.
Rod Walker
Jun 2013
#63
Was the claim that gun owners are law abiding only supported by the fact that someone making
Rod Walker
Jun 2013
#87
Given that these are magazines...for guns...I anticipate loading cartridges into them, taking them
Rod Walker
Jun 2013
#71
What law am I not following? "High-capacity" magazines are still fully legal to own and use
Rod Walker
Jun 2013
#80
You accused me of not following the law. Either tell me what law I'm violating, or retract
Rod Walker
Jun 2013
#84
No I'm not. I have no other profiles on this board. Other than my assertion, I know of no way
Rod Walker
Jun 2013
#166
Well that is the only way to ensure the ban works, magazines do not expire like milk.
Duckhunter935
Jun 2013
#109