General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ZIMMERMAN TRIAL - AFTERNOON: Day 11, Tuesday, July 9, 2013 [View all]JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 10, 2013, 01:56 AM - Edit history (1)
never envisioned an environment where those who used that right would be able to deliberately record audio and video statements of their version of events in a crime, then use those recordings in lieu of actually testifying on the stand, thus avoiding the questioning that justice demands of their version of events.
This tactic has made a perversion of the fifth. The law needs to be clarified so that defendants who voluntarily record statements explaining their version of events, either can not have those statements admitted into evidence at trial, or, if they are admitted, the defendants are declared to have waived their 5th amendment rights and have opened themselves up to questioning. They should not be able to have it both ways. Justice can not be served, as we have just seen in this case, when the defendant can use artifice such as this and still be able to plead the fifth.