Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Matrix: who is Edward Snowden? [View all] flamingdem Jul 2013 OP
Who gives a fuck? The story is not about Snowden. It is about the NSA surveillance overreach. n/t xocet Jul 2013 #1
Maybe that's not the complete story flamingdem Jul 2013 #2
Actually he's secretly working with Obama to get this info to the public. reusrename Jul 2013 #18
I like that idea - be nice if true. ConcernedCanuk Jul 2013 #49
you sound like George W. Bush Skittles Jul 2013 #27
That over-reach was already known years earlier, and many other countries do it, too. blm Jul 2013 #4
Yes, the overreach was known about to some extent, and the Stasi did spy on East Germans.... xocet Jul 2013 #12
Why would I say it shouldn't be discussed? It's always been discussed plenty here blm Jul 2013 #14
But it isn't about "Bush Inc" now. Habibi Jul 2013 #23
What makes you believe that? Naive Dems thought BushInc was retired in 93, too. blm Jul 2013 #30
Interesting tactic on your part....however, the story is still about the NSA overreach and not E. S. xocet Jul 2013 #28
I don't think it's about Snowden either - he was just a conduit. He was groomed to do blm Jul 2013 #29
BTW - what is 'important' about the story now that wasn't 'important' the previous 12 years blm Jul 2013 #33
The fact that these surveillance programs are STILL operating is one thing that is important. xocet Jul 2013 #35
We KNEW that when Congress legalized it. The program was institutionalized in 2006. blm Jul 2013 #38
Do you have any evidence of these claims? n/t xocet Jul 2013 #39
I'm sure the same quantity of evidence exists for this theory as does for Snowden's claims: zero. randome Jul 2013 #41
How can you be sure? BTW, DNI Clapper lied to Congress. I presume you support lying to Congress... xocet Jul 2013 #42
I presume you support Obama being blamed for doing legally what was set in motion blm Jul 2013 #45
No, I don't support lying. randome Jul 2013 #48
Yes - coincidences where the Bush family is involved are never coincidences. blm Jul 2013 #44
Yep. Dell is a huge tipoff. Michael Dell gave $250,000 for W's inauguration. DevonRex Jul 2013 #40
One would have to be a 'coincidence theorist' to not see what happened here. blm Jul 2013 #43
And Dell is owned by Michael Dell and Silver Lake Partners. DevonRex Jul 2013 #50
From the beginning it smelled like a standard Bush op to me to prevent a Dem president blm Jul 2013 #3
Yes, and it was amazing how little condemnation there was when Snowden singlehandedly damaged flamingdem Jul 2013 #5
Walk down memory lane.... blm Jul 2013 #6
So that nixed Clinton's trip to China flamingdem Jul 2013 #7
Pretty much everything. The deals in the 70s with China's financial and industrial elites blm Jul 2013 #11
that is interesting to me as rand paul's biggest career donor is the club for growth, jackson HiPointDem Jul 2013 #17
Now that is quite interesting flamingdem Jul 2013 #19
i found it curious too. dad's biggest donors were army & navy groups. the kochs were in ron's HiPointDem Jul 2013 #24
Jackson Stephens (deceased) bankrolled Bill Clinton's primary campaign, but, only when blm Jul 2013 #32
I'm losing confidence in the proposition that he exists, frankly Recursion Jul 2013 #8
Well he hasn't spoken a word publically flamingdem Jul 2013 #9
I know, right? arely staircase Jul 2013 #16
interesting theory arely staircase Jul 2013 #10
You might be right. Who knows. But something sure feels wrong about him flamingdem Jul 2013 #13
the endgame to all this will be interesting in the short run arely staircase Jul 2013 #15
Maybe he intends to write a script about it and sell it to Hollywood Amonester Jul 2013 #21
No kidding. Maybe that's why he came out with forceful support flamingdem Jul 2013 #25
Absurd marions ghost Jul 2013 #46
Who Benefits? Financially? Politically? KittyWampus Jul 2013 #20
Yes, but this one's tougher than Follow The Money flamingdem Jul 2013 #22
NWO - Bushgang style. blm Jul 2013 #34
i have a theory. snowden is actually kermit roosevelt iii. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #26
Interesting.. kentuck Jul 2013 #31
This is a Bush op. Obviously. Same with all the CIA leaks. nt DevonRex Jul 2013 #36
Conspiracy Theories are a dime a dozen usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #37
Ditto marions ghost Jul 2013 #47
Typical when there's a dearth of knowledge. longship Jul 2013 #51
Why is this not in creative speculation? Democracyinkind Jul 2013 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Matrix: who is Edward Sno...»Reply #47