Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Most Of The New Jobs Were Part-Time [View all]
As the CNN report below the initial article demonstrates, the shift from secure full-time permanent jobs to insecure part-time temporary work has been the hallmark of the Bush/Obama era - and this trend is accelerating.
http://www.businessinsider.com/part-time-jump-in-july-2013-8
Most Of The New Jobs Were Part-Time
Steven Perlberg Aug. 2, 2013, 8:36 AM
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' household survey, part-time jobs jumped by 174,000 to 28,233,000 in July.
Full-time workers climbed by 92,000.
Full-time workers are down from the May jobs report while part-time workers are up for the same time period.
Workers are generally considered to be "full time" if they work over 30 hours per week.
Some economists have speculated the shift from full time to part time [link:http://www.businessinsider.com/ubs-obamacare-delay-brings-uncertainty-2013-7derives from the employer mandate in the Affordable Care Act]. Under the legislation, employers will be required to offer health insurance or face penalties (though the White House will delay enforcement until 2015). As a result, many companies have threatened to reduce full-time staff to below the 50-employee threshold for the mandate or scale back hours.
But the effect of the employer on today's part-time figures remains unclear. In fact, some economists were more optimistic when part-time workers surged last month, arguing that the ratio of part-time to full-time was seasonal and expected.
CNN Business' report on this issue is sobering. Check out the reader comments, too:
http://money.cnn.com/2013/08/01/news/economy/temp-jobs/
Want a job? Good luck finding full-time work
By Tami Luhby @Luhby August 1, 2013: 12:49 PM ET
More people are landing jobs these days, but they are often part-time or temp work.
The number of Americans finding part-time jobs has surged this year, with more than four times as many getting only part-time work as opposed to full-time jobs, according to Labor Department data. That's the opposite of what happened last year, when full-time hires far outstripped part-time ones.
At the same time, the ranks of temps has exploded: A record 2.7 million people held these positions in June, up from 2.5 million a year ago. It will be very interesting to see if this continued in July. The government will report the latest figures about the job market on Friday.
While companies have been beefing up their temporary and part-time payrolls in recent years, the trend has accelerated in 2013, with an especially large jump in part-time hiring in June.
There has been much speculation -- and some anecdotal evidence -- that employers are trying to keep their headcount down so they aren't subject to Obamacare rules. But economic uncertainty and a lack of consumer demand are still the predominant reasons why employers are shying away from hiring full-time workers, experts said.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
70 replies, 6547 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (62)
ReplyReply to this post
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
part-time, no benefits, and how many of them were of that horrid "on-call" variety?
niyad
Aug 2013
#1
One DUer said that many places only schedule you a few hours, expecting you to be 'on call'
CrispyQ
Aug 2013
#7
Are you nuts? People who are living these statistic have no bright side to look at.
matthews
Aug 2013
#48
certainly you forgot the sarcasm icon, because you could not possibly have posted this seriously.
niyad
Aug 2013
#57
Here's a BLS paper that describes the undercounting of the long-term unemployed.
leveymg
Aug 2013
#61
oh, dear, having a bit of difficulty following, are we? the post to which you were replying was
niyad
Aug 2013
#67
This has been happening for many years. And even many of the full-time jobs are contract work.
SharonAnn
Aug 2013
#6
Yes, now this is correct as they have their 2015 gig now. But greed works off the clock.
Safetykitten
Aug 2013
#38
My applause was sincere. I'm pleased with this news. I'm not sure why you think it was a slam. eom
millennialmax
Aug 2013
#14
I don't think business executives give a shit about what happens next quarter.
winter is coming
Aug 2013
#46
An old scam that worked well under Reagan. Take away good jobs, replace them with bullshit
Catherina
Aug 2013
#24
You see, there are the people still with full time jobs that post here. They don't get it.
Safetykitten
Aug 2013
#26
People with the jobs apparently do not see the ages of the people that wait on them, or help them..
Safetykitten
Aug 2013
#33
I substitute for a school district, both certified and classified employment,
duffyduff
Aug 2013
#63