Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: US says Manning leak hurt human rights work [View all]Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)26. Us treatment of Manning in custody hurt American credibility on human rights issues, they mean
The UN special rapporteur on torture has formally accused the US government of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment towards Bradley Manning, the US soldier who was held in solitary confinement for almost a year on suspicion of being the WikiLeaks source.
Juan Mendez has completed a 14-month investigation into the treatment of Manning since the soldier's arrest at a US military base in May 2010. He concludes that the US military was at least culpable of cruel and inhumane treatment in keeping Manning locked up alone for 23 hours a day over an 11-month period in conditions that he also found might have constituted torture.
"The special rapporteur concludes that imposing seriously punitive conditions of detention on someone who has not been found guilty of any crime is a violation of his right to physical and psychological integrity as well as of his presumption of innocence," Mendez writes.
The findings of cruel and inhuman treatment are published as an addendum to the special rapporteur's report to the UN general assembly on the promotion and protection of human rights. They are likely to reignite criticism of the US government's harsh treatment of Manning ahead of his court martial later this year.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/12/bradley-manning-cruel-inhuman-treatment-un
Juan Mendez has completed a 14-month investigation into the treatment of Manning since the soldier's arrest at a US military base in May 2010. He concludes that the US military was at least culpable of cruel and inhumane treatment in keeping Manning locked up alone for 23 hours a day over an 11-month period in conditions that he also found might have constituted torture.
"The special rapporteur concludes that imposing seriously punitive conditions of detention on someone who has not been found guilty of any crime is a violation of his right to physical and psychological integrity as well as of his presumption of innocence," Mendez writes.
The findings of cruel and inhuman treatment are published as an addendum to the special rapporteur's report to the UN general assembly on the promotion and protection of human rights. They are likely to reignite criticism of the US government's harsh treatment of Manning ahead of his court martial later this year.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/12/bradley-manning-cruel-inhuman-treatment-un
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
With 250,000 cables, they can't cite a single solid case of serious actual harm? Just at-risk?
leveymg
Aug 2013
#3
There's a burden of proof in criminal matters - "Not good" doesn't meet the standard
leveymg
Aug 2013
#12
But the burden of proof in sentencing is lower than BRD. Remember, what may not convict you
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#35
What's your actual evidence that Michael Kozak is a "Nazi", asiode from your smirk?
struggle4progress
Aug 2013
#7
Weasel Speak. Human Rights Workers = Agents trained at the School of the Americas, now
Zorra
Aug 2013
#10
He's a career Department of State professional. He's unlikely to have been involved in much during
struggle4progress
Aug 2013
#30
In Volume I of the Walsh report, the Index indicates his name appears only in Chapter 24,
struggle4progress
Aug 2013
#46
Nah...there's actually a bit more to it all than just that. Acting Assistant Secretary Michael Kozak
Zorra
Aug 2013
#52
Well, those are interesting links. Thanks! and thanks for the SoA heads-up
struggle4progress
Aug 2013
#56
Us treatment of Manning in custody hurt American credibility on human rights issues, they mean
Spider Jerusalem
Aug 2013
#26
Pilkington, like too many other Assangists, misrepresented that report
struggle4progress
Aug 2013
#28
Pilkington claims in the Guardian article that "The UN special rapporteur on torture
struggle4progress
Aug 2013
#36
I've never argued for solitary confinement, and I've never argued that extended solitary confinement
struggle4progress
Aug 2013
#45
Manning was held, naked, in isolation, for 23 hours a day for nine months.
Spider Jerusalem
Aug 2013
#48
Getting the facts right is not a "justification" of anything: it's a pre-requisite
struggle4progress
Aug 2013
#54
Allowed visitors on Saturdays and Sundays, as I undersood it. And according to the brig at the time,
struggle4progress
Aug 2013
#58