Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

indepat

(20,899 posts)

3. Do these mf'ers just want the sick to die needlessly? I take back the mf'ers: much too

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Wed Aug 7, 2013, 04:42 PM

Aug 2013

nice a moniker for these mf'er-heads.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

These Six States Want To Allow Health Insurers To Deny Coverage To Sick People [View all] babylonsister Aug 2013 OP

The PPACA doesn't require states to do the enforcement. Would you rather Texas do it or the Feds? nt PoliticAverse Aug 2013 #1

I think I would rather have the Federal Govt oversee PsychoBunny Aug 2013 #2

Do these mf'ers just want the sick to die needlessly? I take back the mf'ers: much too indepat Aug 2013 #3

They may not be thinking that far ahead. They probably think the sick will just pack up and move to jwirr Aug 2013 #28

ACA is the law of the land Doctor_J Aug 2013 #4

The ACA doesn't require the states to do the enforcment, they can pass the task to the Feds. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2013 #14

That's the way I look at it. AlinPA Aug 2013 #18

No, I think this is a good thing. Hear me out... demwing Aug 2013 #5

Seriously? Do you support screwing me over? Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #7

absolutely not demwing Aug 2013 #8

Yeah, I would. But if I'm going to be stuck with the shittier option, I'd at least like to have it. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #9

Look, the RW IS going to screw you and a lot of people over, just as they have been for decades. kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #11

So I'm collateral damage? Great. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #12

Don't look at me. I didn't create the situation. I've wanted Single Payer for many years now. kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #13

we're all collateral damage. Sometimes the just thing is to take the bullet for others. Sirveri Aug 2013 #35

Before the Democratic party went into super-spin cycle, 70% of Americans wanted it in 2009. Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #20

How do you imagine that the federal government will be forced to provide an alternative? n/t Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #19

Wishful thinking, but here's my logic: demwing Aug 2013 #22

LOL! If only Sam, Toby, and Josh existed. Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #23

Tell me your understanding of this built-in exclusion /nt demwing Aug 2013 #24

Sections 1401 (a) & (c), if I'm remembering the nomenclature correctly. Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #25

Just who is going to 'force' them? n2doc Aug 2013 #27

Egalitarian Thug asked the same thing already in post #19 demwing Aug 2013 #30

If wishes were horses, Beggars would ride n/t n2doc Aug 2013 #31

I bet that when MLK delivered his "I have a Dream" speech demwing Aug 2013 #32

Sure. And he died for that dream n2doc Aug 2013 #33

I'm a cynic as well demwing Aug 2013 #34

I will leave Arizona if this isn't resolved. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #6

It is resolved. The Feds will do the enforcement as the PPACA requires them to PoliticAverse Aug 2013 #16

Bad article ceonupe Aug 2013 #10

Do states have the right to drop the mandate? leftstreet Aug 2013 #15

States aren't enforcing the mandate, that's the IRS's job. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2013 #17

Both Huelskamp and Chaffetz should be permanently denied health care as should the R's in Congress Mr. David Aug 2013 #21

Maybe if we called it Romney-care. RC Aug 2013 #26

Sounds like an illegal strike. Conium Aug 2013 #29