Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gay Texas judge refuses to wed straight couples [View all]William769
(55,273 posts)4. I support why she is doing it and I also applaud why she is doing it.
It's called equal protection under the law. If one group of people is not protected, why should anther group of people be protected under the same law.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I know you are ppr'd, but by "traditional" do you mean between people of the same skin color or
uppityperson
Feb 2012
#44
You ARE going to bring up man-on-dog and box turtles any minute now, aren't you?
2ndAmForComputers
Feb 2012
#40
I see it rather as a judge who is simply applying a consistent ethical standard...
LanternWaste
Feb 2012
#6
Screw that. Each and everybody who voted for Prop H8 and similar abominations is a bigot. PERIOD.
2ndAmForComputers
Feb 2012
#36
K&R. I suppose, in theory, she could argue that constitutional law prohibits her from discriminatin
closeupready
Feb 2012
#8