Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
108. Not 'told them to do' like they're lapdogs. The treaty sharing info goes back to WW2.
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 03:18 AM
Aug 2013

Last edited Sun Aug 25, 2013, 08:39 AM - Edit history (1)

The entire Anglosphere has been sharing a lot of information offically on the same basis it did during that war. Below is a post by Devon Rex,although most of us knew this for years, just not this well laid out:

I'll spell it out: UKUSA. It's the SIGINT Intelligence Agreement. BRUSA.

Might as well be signed in blood.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UKUSA_Agreement

United Kingdom – United States of America Agreement (UKUSA, /juːkuːˈsɑː/ ew-koo-sah) is a multilateral agreement for cooperation in signals intelligence between the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The alliance of intelligence operations is also known as Five Eyes (FVEY). It was first signed in March 1946 by the United Kingdom and the United States and later extended to encompass the three Commonwealth realms of Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The UKUSA Agreement was a follow-up of the 1943 BRUSA Agreement, the World War II agreement on cooperation over intelligence matters. This was a secret treaty, allegedly so secret that it was kept secret from the Australian Prime Ministers until 1973.

The agreement established an alliance of five English-speaking countries for the purpose of sharing intelligence, especially signals intelligence. It formalized the intelligence sharing agreement in the Atlantic Charter, signed in 1941, before the entry of the U.S. into the conflict.

History

The agreement originated from a ten-page British–U.S. Communication Intelligence Agreement, also known as BRUSA, that connected the signal intercept networks of the U.K. Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) and the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) at the beginning of the Cold War. The document was signed on March 5, 1946 by Colonel Patrick Marr-Johnson for the U.K.'s London Signals Intelligence Board and Lieutenant General Hoyt Vandenberg for the U.S. State–Army–Navy Communication Intelligence Board. Although the original agreement states that the exchange would not be "prejudicial to national interests", the United States often blocked information sharing from Commonwealth countries. The full text of the agreement was released to the public on June 25, 2010.

Under the agreement, the GCHQ and the NSA shared intelligence on the Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China, and several eastern European countries (known as Exotics). The network was expanded in the 1960s into the Echelon collection and analysis network.

In July 2013, as part of the 2013 Edward Snowden revelations, it emerged that the NSA is paying GCHQ for its services, with at least £100 million of payments made between 2010–13.

Collection mechanisms

The UKUSA alliance is often associated with the ECHELON system; however, processed intelligence is reliant on multiple sources of information and the intelligence shared is not restricted to signals intelligence.

The "Five Eyes" in question are –

USA – National Security Agency
United Kingdom – Government Communications Headquarters
Canada – Communications Security Establishment
Australia – Defence Signals Directorate
New Zealand – Government Communications Security Bureau

Global coverage

Each member of the UKUSA alliance is officially assigned lead responsibility for intelligence collection and analysis in different parts of the globe.

Australia

Australia hunts for communications originating in Indochina, Indonesia, and southern China.

Canada

Formerly the northern portions of the former Soviet Union and conducting sweeps of all communications traffic that could be picked up from embassies around the world. In the post-Cold War era, a greater emphasis has been placed on monitoring satellite, radio and cellphone traffic originating from Central and South America, primarily in an effort to track drugs and non-aligned paramilitary groups in the region.

New Zealand

The Waihopai Valley Facility—base of the New Zealand branch of the ECHELON Program.
New Zealand is responsible for the western Pacific. Listening posts in the South Island at Waihopai Valley just south-west of Blenheim, and on the North Island at Tangimoana. The Anti-Bases Campaign holds regular protests in order to have the listening posts closed down.

United Kingdom
Europe, Africa, and European Russia.

United States

Monitors most of Latin America, Asia, Asiatic Russia, and northern China.

http://election.democraticunderground.com/10023492002#post7

Devon Rex writes, 'Might as well be signed in blood.' That is true. Millions of people died in that war and that's still taken seriously. True, it was before most of us were born but it formed the world we live in.

It's NOT a secret and it was not forced, it was for mutual protection in a world being overrun by fascists, who were not kidding one damned bit. If a new generation wants to break the ties of the USA to the Anglosphere, just go for it.

The information is the legal property of all of those nations, and the agreement was literally written in the blood of millions of combatants and civilians. It was a period of total warfare before the Gevena accords as they stand now and the Nuremberg tribunal.

That blood has long since dried for some and may be forgotten, but for others, it has meaning that guides how they live their lives.

I don't see that anyone is offering a solution except by legislation restricting governments from taking private information as they have in Europe. That is the real worry here. What goes between those governments is not the same as that concern.

But there is no legislation saying it is proper to take information from any of those treaty partners. And no calls to revoke the treaty that was signed to make it Britain's business so many years ago. Most of us dream of a world without any enemies and I think many of us are in vigorous debate over who the enemy du jour is as we see things today.

Miranda detention facts: [View all] ProSense Aug 2013 OP
nothing to do with the US government = laugh of the day :-) nt msongs Aug 2013 #1
Elaborate. ProSense Aug 2013 #3
Elegant. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #31
You can spell! ProSense Aug 2013 #58
LOL! tk2kewl Aug 2013 #113
if that's the case burnodo Aug 2013 #2
? ProSense Aug 2013 #6
Because they decided to do so burnodo Aug 2013 #12
Yes, controlling and having a lot of influence are two different things. nt ohnoyoudidnt Aug 2013 #20
Yes burnodo Aug 2013 #25
The U.S. government isn't the British government. ProSense Aug 2013 #23
You didnt answer anything I addressed specifically burnodo Aug 2013 #27
"Based on" they wanted to do it. ProSense Aug 2013 #39
now you're echoing government talking points burnodo Aug 2013 #43
What? ProSense Aug 2013 #54
I can deny they made the decision on their own burnodo Aug 2013 #61
Then why would the British government have to "notify" and give a "heads up? ProSense Aug 2013 #68
umm, you directly contradict yourself in every other post burnodo Aug 2013 #70
No, and you can continue speculating. n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #73
Ridculous ..you're way over your head lumpy Aug 2013 #103
Not 'told them to do' like they're lapdogs. The treaty sharing info goes back to WW2. freshwest Aug 2013 #108
When their argument has no merit.. accuse you of Cha Aug 2013 #83
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH what a laugh lumpy Aug 2013 #102
Because Snowden dumped on the UK's surveillance programs too. PAY ATTENTION. KittyWampus Aug 2013 #104
OMG! Tell us more! Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #4
+1 Safetykitten Aug 2013 #93
And leaking about the NSA is not a crime against Britain. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2013 #5
Did you ProSense Aug 2013 #9
"Greenwald stated that he's NOW going to focus on the U.K.?" Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2013 #11
He has already published information on the U.K. He said it will increase his focus. n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #17
No, Miranda hasn't published anything on the UK. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2013 #22
Miranda? What the hell are you talking about? n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #24
I presume you remember that the OP that you started was about Miranda being detained. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2013 #46
Oh brother. ProSense Aug 2013 #55
You justify the detention of Miranda by citing the fact the UK has no 1A and Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2013 #62
You shouldn't ProSense Aug 2013 #72
Was Miranda carrying/delivering stolen property ? lumpy Aug 2013 #107
He said that AFTER Miranda was detained burnodo Aug 2013 #14
You appear not to know what you're talking about. n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #19
and you do? burnodo Aug 2013 #30
Yes, google it. n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #56
Any minute now people will come on here and say its all the USAs fault, but JaneyVee Aug 2013 #7
Yeah, sure as shit. nm Cha Aug 2013 #85
Yes, no evidence, little education on the subject, and clueless. lumpy Aug 2013 #105
but....but.....the right leaning gov in Britain does what the left leaning gov in America wants it.. uponit7771 Aug 2013 #8
left leaning? burnodo Aug 2013 #15
yeah, you're right... far left leaning.... I was trying to be..............conservative :-) uponit7771 Aug 2013 #16
what in the hell are you talking about? burnodo Aug 2013 #33
You forgot Bengaiz and Fast and Furious.....throw in Birth Certificate there somewhere too uponit7771 Aug 2013 #36
again, you need some sleep burnodo Aug 2013 #38
WTF are you talking about? NuclearDem Aug 2013 #50
Just a way to smear anyone who disagrees with them by applying Issa's neverforget Aug 2013 #80
your "left leaning" us government is to the right, politically, of the "right leaning" british Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #34
Don't forget IRS scandal or something else inanely untrue uponit7771 Aug 2013 #37
I think the IRS "scandal" is bullshit burnodo Aug 2013 #41
you all aren't even putting up a good show anymore, this is no fun. Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #42
BENGHAZI!!! uponit7771 Aug 2013 #44
been drinkin? Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #47
Nah, just don't know what they're talking about NuclearDem Aug 2013 #51
but but but, you can't tell any snowden fans that Cha Aug 2013 #88
Truly. I feel so sad about the ignorance and dishonor that exists in this country. lumpy Aug 2013 #106
"nothing to do with the US government". Oh, c'mon. Marr Aug 2013 #10
Huh? ProSense Aug 2013 #13
People on the right claim Obama is a dictator in word and deed, don't understand this meme coming uponit7771 Aug 2013 #18
I think Andy823 Aug 2013 #29
Seriously? You're going to sit there and claim that the Brits actions here had Marr Aug 2013 #84
I wonder why the UK gave the US a heads-up leftstreet Aug 2013 #21
Why is that unusual? ProSense Aug 2013 #26
Let me rephrase that: NuclearDem Aug 2013 #35
Wait, ProSense Aug 2013 #45
Then why even notify the US if it was just a British action? NuclearDem Aug 2013 #49
Because they wanted to. ProSense Aug 2013 #59
Doncha know, the UK always lets the US know when they have detained a Brazilian citizen. progressoid Aug 2013 #94
Perhaps because he is married to an American citizen? VanillaRhapsody Aug 2013 #63
You know, this is a really half hearted effort on your part. Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #28
Well, ProSense Aug 2013 #48
You are defending a chilling, heavy handed, authoritarian effort to suppress Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #52
No, ProSense Aug 2013 #66
You do know the UK has a higher rating for press freedom from RWB than the United States, right? NuclearDem Aug 2013 #71
Well, ProSense Aug 2013 #74
No, just popping your little bullshit argument that a British First Amendment would solve everything NuclearDem Aug 2013 #75
I made no such assertion. You need to stop debating yourself. ProSense Aug 2013 #77
Ugh, more disingenuous horseshit. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #79
No ProSense Aug 2013 #89
This message was self-deleted by its author Autumn Aug 2013 #86
"They applied a law that wasn't intended for the purpose" a fact we can agree on. Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #112
The poodle is well trained by now? Paulie Aug 2013 #32
And so is The UK. Hassin Bin Sober Aug 2013 #53
"But the "customer" the UK's GCHQ agency frets about most is the NSA" dkf Aug 2013 #40
The British ProSense Aug 2013 #57
No they aren't because we are the customer of their intelligence product, the source of their $!!! dkf Aug 2013 #64
So ProSense Aug 2013 #67
Our interest enables their interest. dkf Aug 2013 #69
Detention Facts sounds like a band! Vinnie From Indy Aug 2013 #60
You have facts? Katashi_itto Aug 2013 #65
Plausible deniability. Bonobo Aug 2013 #76
Explain what this issue has to do with the U.S. government. ProSense Aug 2013 #78
As I said. Bonobo Aug 2013 #81
A bit premature MFrohike Aug 2013 #82
Really? ProSense Aug 2013 #95
I should be more clear MFrohike Aug 2013 #99
Not to mention ... frazzled Aug 2013 #87
Excuse me!?!!! It's Obama's fault! and, so is every fucking Cha Aug 2013 #90
Didn't Snowden say that he could snoop on the President of the USA... Peace Patriot Aug 2013 #91
Do you have any clips that prove that the UK is not the US? Safetykitten Aug 2013 #92
"This incident has nothing to do with the U.S. government." progressoid Aug 2013 #96
Funny images, but they don't change the facts. n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #97
facts? progressoid Aug 2013 #98
I do not agree.... dtom67 Aug 2013 #100
The NSA is IN the USA. Snowden. NSA. USA. Lint Head Aug 2013 #101
Red Herring Special: Cooked your way GeorgeGist Aug 2013 #109
Britain doesn't have a first amendment, which makes it a less than ideal environment for journalist SwissTony Aug 2013 #110
Have you told the Brits? GeorgeGist Aug 2013 #111
How exactly ProSense Aug 2013 #114
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Miranda detention facts»Reply #108