Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 01:00 AM Aug 2013

Whether or not Assad used chemical weapons doesn't alter my thoughts on military intervention much [View all]

It's one factor, but not a very big one.

I'm a pessimist when it comes to using military force, both intellectually from having studied history and viscerally from having been part of an ill-advised invasion of Iraq.

Personally (and I know many on DU see this differently, in two different directions), I have one and only one question I ask when I'm pondering the US use of military force: would the use of force advance or impede US security?

Intelligence is an imperfect field, of course, and you can never know for certain, but I have trouble imagining a situation in which intervention in Syria has benefits for the US that outweigh the liabilities that come with it. Toppling dictators willy-nilly doesn't particularly make the world a safer place, and that region is dangerous enough as it is.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whether or not Assad used...