Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama admin silent as USPS lays off 35,000 workers...with more layoffs to come [View all]brentspeak
(18,290 posts)145. I think you're right about Obama not appointing Donohoe
Last edited Sun Feb 26, 2012, 03:12 PM - Edit history (2)
Regardless -- after all is said, Obama is still on the same page as Patrick Donohoe, so the reality of the situation remains the same even if I made a blunder here on a web forum. They both agree with Saturday closings, they both want large postal rate increases, and they both apparently agree with the facility closings and job cuts:
The Postal Service has proposed each of the changes Obama advanced as well as reducing its workforce by firing as many as 220,000 employees and closing post offices and mail-processing plants.
Obamas budget didnt address the facility closings or job cuts.
Its a political hot potato for them, Del Polito said. They dont want to tick off a key Democratic constituency going into a national election.
Furthermore, and most importantly, for three years, the Obama administration has failed to endorse any of the Democratic-led legislative efforts to reverse the 2006 prefunding requirement. The administration didn't bother to address the issue at all until the other week when it submitted postal reform suggestions for the new federal budget. As evidenced by the facility closings made at the same exact time -- what's the point now? That is hardly the mark of a President who had seriously wanted to prevent all these facility closings and job cuts.
Finally, as for presidents and the people they nominate to USPS brass postions:
http://www.savethepostoffice.com/what-were-you-thinking-mr-president-obama-nominates-hammond-prc
What were you thinking, Mr. President? Obama nominates Hammond to the PRC
December 2, 2011
On Friday the White House announced that President Obama was nominating Tony Hammond as the fifth commissioner on the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC). No offense to Mr. Hammond, but thats probably not good news for communities trying to save their post office or processing plant, and its not good news for postal workers either.
The PRC is supposed to have five commissioners, but for months now, there have been only four, and weve been waiting to hear who the President would nominate to fill out the term of Commissioner Dan Blair, which runs to November 2012. According to US Code, "Not more than three of the Commissioners may be adherents of the same political party." Currently there are two Democrats Ruth Goldway and Nanci Langley and two Republicans Mark Acton and Robert Taub. Obama could have appointed a Democrat, but instead he chose Hammond, a Republican.
Its not that Hammond is ill equipped to be a Commissioner. He was on the PRC from 2002 to 2010, and he served twice as its Vice-Chairman. He obviously knows the ropes.
Still, with all those years on the PRC, you wouldnt say Hammond brings a fresh perspective to the Commission, and he is definitely hard-core Republican. For much of his career, he was a Republican political operative. From 1989 to 1994, he was the director of the Missouri Republican Party, and in 1998 he was Director of Campaign Operations for the Republican National Committee. Hammond was involved with postal matters during the ten years he served on Capitol Hill on the staff of Southwest Missouri Congressman Gene Taylor, the Ranking Member of the Post Office and Civil Service Committee.
(Note: Obama's one other nomination to the PRC was Republican Robert G. Taub.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
155 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama admin silent as USPS lays off 35,000 workers...with more layoffs to come [View all]
brentspeak
Feb 2012
OP
Who do you include in your definition of bourgeoise? I still think the working class needs a wakeup
rhett o rick
Feb 2012
#118
Sorry, I am totally lost. And yes I am sober. At least for the next half hour. nm
rhett o rick
Feb 2012
#130
When you talked about oligarchs v. people you were definitely on the right track -
TBF
Feb 2012
#135
Thank you for the clarification. Withholding our labor isnt an option at this
rhett o rick
Feb 2012
#150
Collectively the American middle class still has a lot of capital. They want that capital.
rhett o rick
Feb 2012
#152
No, once again bipartisan neoliberalism supports short sighted vested interests and upward transfers
PufPuf23
Feb 2012
#44
It's a continuing downward spiral for many, but if the markets go up too many think this is
RKP5637
Feb 2012
#3
USPS will be gone in ten years, so what happens if they don't fund retiree benefits now?
FarCenter
Feb 2012
#26
Why would they be gone in 10 years, they can be competitive in similar things to
RKP5637
Feb 2012
#27
I had read at one time that another problem USPS has is having to deliver to every
RKP5637
Feb 2012
#29
This is what I thought was the real reason that UPS is going bankrupt.It happened before Pres..
The Wielding Truth
Feb 2012
#54
"Just because it's obsolete for you doesn't make it so for everyone else."
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2012
#107
And you don't particularly strike me as someone who can be lumped in with "any" of "us".
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2012
#144
Waxman and Davis are not the ones responsible for the prefunding requirement
brentspeak
Feb 2012
#16
Well, this should all be a nice boon the private sector. I bet UPS and Fedex is funding Darrel Issa.
JNathanK
Feb 2012
#13
Many, if not all, are tring to avoid closure through cost cutting and efficiency measures
bhikkhu
Feb 2012
#25
"2006 bill, if they did not have to do that, they'd be TURNING A PROFIT RIGHT NOW."
SunsetDreams
Feb 2012
#35
We do a lot of eBay and we ship just about everything USPS, except for some large and
RKP5637
Feb 2012
#37
No, the USPS is running at a major loss because of the prefunding requirement
brentspeak
Feb 2012
#146
Rural America and its many teabaggers do want to pay for maintaining this service level
high density
Feb 2012
#32
^Post of the Day^ Cutting through the lies about the situation with the USPS.
Major Hogwash
Feb 2012
#55
What other businesses are artificially burdened with a bankrupting prefunding requirement?
brentspeak
Feb 2012
#61
With the internet and their pension costs, their cashflow is in a world of hurt. Something needs to
RBInMaine
Feb 2012
#69
Are you insane??? I have not had hundreds of posts deleted and have not accused but maybe 2 people
Pisces
Feb 2012
#153
This quote calls the whole basis of the o.p. into doubt. I'm so glad you're here.
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2012
#115
I hate that this has happened. But people don't use the USPS much anymore, do they?
Honeycombe8
Feb 2012
#82
It's the same old crowd that will rec anything (and I seriously mean ANYTHING)
Number23
Feb 2012
#154
If we mail all those "business reply mail" cards and envelopes, would the USPS earn more money?
FarCenter
Feb 2012
#113
So many lies, no need to bother with arguing, as there is no intent of being truthful.
boppers
Feb 2012
#124
Someone needs to file a lawsuit against the Republicans and the administration re: PO
New Yawker
Feb 2012
#125
You must have flunked civics--the President can't override laws that have been
geek tragedy
Feb 2012
#134