Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 92 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Straight up or down: Do ...»Reply #81
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Straight up or down: Do you support U.S. strikes against Assad's forces in Syria? [View all]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Straight up or down: Do you support U.S. strikes against Assad's forces in Syria? [View all] cali Aug 2013 OP
No, but with the caveat that quinnox Aug 2013 #1
Don't get your hopes up. joshcryer Aug 2013 #45
Nope. A pox on the whole lot of them. kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #2
Both. Wait Wut Aug 2013 #3
Ack. There is the very real probability that strikes will make things worse cali Aug 2013 #4
Exactly. Wait Wut Aug 2013 #13
No repercussions for chemical weapons will surely improve the Syrian's lot jeff47 Aug 2013 #19
yeah, Syria exists in a vacuum. Not. cali Aug 2013 #35
The British PM just now was forced to acknowledge that that evidence of sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #83
No. You have to actually read the reports jeff47 Aug 2013 #96
But cali - Iraq is so peaceful now! ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #59
You forgot Libya! cali Aug 2013 #60
How is killing Syrian civilians lark Aug 2013 #84
Oh Hell No. I want to eliminate the Pentagon and CIA NSA DHS, worthless wastes of money. NYC_SKP Aug 2013 #5
Life was better in the middle of the depression Progressive dog Aug 2013 #16
My entire life we have been in a state of war. My entire life. I'm 61 years old. Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #18
Thank you. NYC_SKP Aug 2013 #22
yep - well said ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #57
I don't get what you are saying Progressive dog Aug 2013 #65
So your point is that without perpetual war we would be in permanent economic depression? Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #68
I'm pretty sure we weren't involved in any shooting conflicts under Carter HoneychildMooseMoss Aug 2013 #73
I view our history a bit differently than some of you. Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #78
One distinction I'd make in that list is that some of those were evacuation of embassies davidpdx Aug 2013 #89
You are missing the larger picture. Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #92
Still my point stands that the evacuation of embassies is not combat davidpdx Aug 2013 #93
Except for during the Carter administration. n/t Mr.Bill Aug 2013 #77
You have to remember that we actually avebury Aug 2013 #48
We had an obsolete industrial base Progressive dog Aug 2013 #64
Rread History free0352 Aug 2013 #85
We should have learned before... sarisataka Aug 2013 #6
i wish you had a "not at this present time" option dionysus Aug 2013 #7
I think that would be a no. cali Aug 2013 #9
ok then. dionysus Aug 2013 #10
Not much. Here is what I might support a tad more... cthulu2016 Aug 2013 #8
I am no expert, but based on common sense concerns I would like to know what chemical agent experts Dragonfli Aug 2013 #71
I've yet to here a viable argument from the government that such strikes Johonny Aug 2013 #11
No! Until proven otherwise, MelungeonWoman Aug 2013 #12
+1 Javaman Aug 2013 #14
Based on what I know currently, oppose. nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #15
I believe we need to be pushing for an on-the-ground armed multinational peacekeeping force. Chan790 Aug 2013 #17
That is a bad idea jeff47 Aug 2013 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Riftaxe Aug 2013 #75
The Mideast map is about to be redrawn. roamer65 Aug 2013 #21
Most political analysts are predicting strikes on hard targets not Assad's forces. KittyWampus Aug 2013 #23
whatever. I know your're gung ho cali Aug 2013 #29
You are wrong. So let it be noted, you don't bother to read what people post. KittyWampus Aug 2013 #32
Is it your innate moral superiority which entitles you to speak to others like that? jberryhill Aug 2013 #53
No, it's the history of the poster that makes the point obvious. U4ikLefty Aug 2013 #55
The people of DU have spoken. KamaAina Aug 2013 #24
No! Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #25
No, but not for the reasons you think meow2u3 Aug 2013 #26
NO Chisox08 Aug 2013 #27
Yes, with the caveat that Hayabusa Aug 2013 #28
this pretty much mirrors the opinion of the general public cali Aug 2013 #30
Interesting Flying Squirrel Aug 2013 #41
No alcibiades_mystery Aug 2013 #31
"Probably not". Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2013 #33
Let's talk about war crimes, Lionel Mandrake Aug 2013 #34
No. H2O Man Aug 2013 #36
At this time... kentuck Aug 2013 #37
Not only no, but hell no. Autumn Aug 2013 #38
Hell no. woo me with science Aug 2013 #39
No (nt) bigwillq Aug 2013 #40
kick cali Aug 2013 #42
Nice poll debunking the DUers are warmongers outrage. joshcryer Aug 2013 #43
thought it would be interesting to see the numbers n/t cali Aug 2013 #44
I always appreciate a nice clean poll. joshcryer Aug 2013 #46
another vote for HELL FUCKING NO nt steve2470 Aug 2013 #47
Right now, based on what I KNOW (not think or suppose), the answer is no. 11 Bravo Aug 2013 #49
No straight up or down on this issue... Jeff In Milwaukee Aug 2013 #50
Not just no, but HELL NO!!!! gopiscrap Aug 2013 #51
No BuelahWitch Aug 2013 #52
No! Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #54
NO! Dawson Leery Aug 2013 #56
is there a "HELL NO!" option? AsahinaKimi Aug 2013 #58
Topple Assad erpowers Aug 2013 #61
Let the locals do it then - USA has enough troubles right at home. ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #62
It Seems They Cannot erpowers Aug 2013 #79
Yeah - ur right - USA sure did Iraq a favor by removing Saddam ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #82
Wonderful. Then we get islamists with "Christians to Beirut; Alawites to the grave" eridani Aug 2013 #91
Does Not Have To Be That Way erpowers Aug 2013 #95
Yes. Because far more people will be killed with US military intervention eridani Aug 2013 #97
93% say no Cali_Democrat Aug 2013 #63
NO! R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2013 #66
As I post this, no. Throd Aug 2013 #67
Nope. Stay out. jsr Aug 2013 #69
Straight Up and Down - I love that song! REP Aug 2013 #70
Let the global community deal with global problems. What hubris to assume so much self importance Coyotl Aug 2013 #72
Hell No. Riftaxe Aug 2013 #74
No no no! David__77 Aug 2013 #76
Kick. Won't get fooled again. grahamhgreen Aug 2013 #80
No! myrna minx Aug 2013 #81
After 50 years of it I am sick of watching america pretend to fix the world CBGLuthier Aug 2013 #86
Bet I could name all the "yes" votes. /nt Marr Aug 2013 #87
Wow, DU is definitely reflecting the Mainstream only 9% of the American sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #88
No, I think the situation is too complex davidpdx Aug 2013 #90
I am 100% against military strikes on Syria at this time. Iggo Aug 2013 #94
undecided, leaning now toward yes. nt arely staircase Aug 2013 #98
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Straight up or down: Do ...»Reply #81
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2025 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.