Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(56,582 posts)

15. They could overturn the War Powers Act, unfortunately, that would take things back

Mon Sep 2, 2013, 01:28 AM

Sep 2013

to how it was before that, where the President had essentially complete discretion limited only by Congress's ability to refuse to pay for it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Attacking Syria: Congress should insist that its vote be *binding* [View all] MannyGoldstein Sep 2013 OP

Binding both ways? cthulu2016 Sep 2013 #1

I tend to agree gopiscrap Sep 2013 #2

Except if it's true that the rebels have Sarin gas... joshcryer Sep 2013 #3

maybe he doesn't want to JI7 Sep 2013 #10

How would they do so ? n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2013 #4

If Congress says No and he does it anyway, he'll finally NightWatcher Sep 2013 #5

As we've been learning for over thirty years... Scootaloo Sep 2013 #18

There is a separation of powers... kentuck Sep 2013 #7

Congress does not have that power. Adrahil Sep 2013 #9

I believe that only Congress can declare war. MannyGoldstein Sep 2013 #11

Yes... But... Adrahil Sep 2013 #12

An act of war against a foreign government when MannyGoldstein Sep 2013 #13

I'm certain they do.... Adrahil Sep 2013 #14

The Quasi-war is another good example Recursion Sep 2013 #16

There's really one way MFrohike Sep 2013 #17