Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Alan Grayson "We Are NOT The World's Policemen! Nor The World's Judge Jury And Executioner!" [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)37. We're not, except when it comes to Iran
Sending Message to Iran, House Approves Tougher Sanctions
By RICK GLADSTONE
The House overwhelmingly approved legislation on Wednesday that would impose the toughest sanctions yet on Iran, calling the measure a critical step to cripple the countrys disputed nuclear program and brushing aside calls for restraint by critics who said the Iranian president-elect should first be given a chance to negotiate.
The 400-to-20 vote to approve the legislation, known as the Nuclear Iran Prevention Act, came four days before the inauguration of Irans President-elect Hassan Rouhani, a moderate cleric who won on a tide of dissatisfaction with the conservative hard-liners who have been in power in Iran for the past eight years. Mr. Rouhani, a former nuclear negotiator, has said he will seek to ease tensions with the United States.
<...>
There had been little doubt that the bill, which now goes to the Senate for consideration in September after the Congressional summer recess, would be approved, given the widespread antipathy in Washington for Irans government since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
But the timing of the vote had raised alarm among some lawmakers who contended it would be viewed in Iran as a blatantly hostile signal at a delicate time. Experts in Iranian politics said they feared the vote could embolden Irans hard-liners and weaken Mr. Rouhanis ability to ease the estrangement with the United States.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/01/us/politics/sending-message-to-iran-house-approves-tougher-sanctions.html
By RICK GLADSTONE
The House overwhelmingly approved legislation on Wednesday that would impose the toughest sanctions yet on Iran, calling the measure a critical step to cripple the countrys disputed nuclear program and brushing aside calls for restraint by critics who said the Iranian president-elect should first be given a chance to negotiate.
The 400-to-20 vote to approve the legislation, known as the Nuclear Iran Prevention Act, came four days before the inauguration of Irans President-elect Hassan Rouhani, a moderate cleric who won on a tide of dissatisfaction with the conservative hard-liners who have been in power in Iran for the past eight years. Mr. Rouhani, a former nuclear negotiator, has said he will seek to ease tensions with the United States.
<...>
There had been little doubt that the bill, which now goes to the Senate for consideration in September after the Congressional summer recess, would be approved, given the widespread antipathy in Washington for Irans government since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
But the timing of the vote had raised alarm among some lawmakers who contended it would be viewed in Iran as a blatantly hostile signal at a delicate time. Experts in Iranian politics said they feared the vote could embolden Irans hard-liners and weaken Mr. Rouhanis ability to ease the estrangement with the United States.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/01/us/politics/sending-message-to-iran-house-approves-tougher-sanctions.html
Roll call: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2013/roll427.xml
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr850/text
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Alan Grayson "We Are NOT The World's Policemen! Nor The World's Judge Jury And Executioner!" [View all]
Segami
Sep 2013
OP
It's almost as if the hots to launch war on Syria were as smoldering as Bushco's hots to
indepat
Sep 2013
#48
We got it. They would have done "a proportional response" and we would hear about it after....
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2013
#47
I'd rather protect the helpless. I could then say it was a noble cause.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2013
#58
That's because there are multiple sides and they aren't talking to each other....
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2013
#72
Technical note: Imperialism does not require a monarch. See the Great Powers, ca.
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#30
Sorry, didn't mean to belabor the obvious. Just didn't want people to confuse
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#34
I would call that a smack down. The only thing I can see is President has finally
bonniebgood
Sep 2013
#8
Alex Nit Witt kept asking the same question as if she expected a different response!
Dustlawyer
Sep 2013
#18
ah, yes ... another RW example of the liberals being in "lockstep" with Der Fuhrer Obama ...
zbdent
Sep 2013
#23
I hold no brief for the racist Paul father and son clan. But Ron Paul did speak out publicly and
HardTimes99
Sep 2013
#32
Even if we needed a World Police, Judge, Jury, & Executioner, it sure as hell shouldn't be the USA!
Towlie
Sep 2013
#24
K&R Mr Grayson, as usual, is right. BTW, Mr Obama, any comments on Napalm-B and White Phosphorus?
idwiyo
Sep 2013
#26
Hi whistler! I think things are going as they should, Alan can speak at length in the HoR. He didn't
freshwest
Sep 2013
#52
Internationally we appear to think we are, Obama (and indeed most authoritarians) saw the movie
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#38