General Discussion

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)

15. You claim to not know what a "bankster" is, but you claim that the DOJ has gone after 3000.

Tue Sep 3, 2013, 06:06 AM

Sep 2013

Wouldn't you understand, as intelligent people commonly do, that the term "bankster" refers to a criminal? A type of criminal that has violated federal criminal laws while being in the banking business.

At a minimum, wouldn't you understand that a banker who has been involved in the robo-signing of false documents to facilitate foreclosures to benefit their bank is a bankster? Do you not know that signing and recording false documents is a crime?

Do you not know that federal crimes have been violated by people who work at and control banks? At you employed at the DOJ?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Peace Activist's FOIA Accidentally Exposes:"DEA PAYS AT&T for Access to 26 Years of Phone Records" [View all] KoKo Sep 2013 OP

Fuck we as a nation needs to wake up! gopiscrap Sep 2013 #1

Whoa! nt Mojorabbit Sep 2013 #2

Didn't even know they KEPT records that long. dixiegrrrrl Sep 2013 #3

AT&T probably keeps the metadata forever Recursion Sep 2013 #9

And with all this data, the DOJ can't go after the banksters? AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #4

How many do they have to sue before people stop saying this? Recursion Sep 2013 #10

Sounds like a news cycle problem Trillo Sep 2013 #12

Well, I'm still not sure what a "bankster" is Recursion Sep 2013 #13

That is really great news. Too bad it's not reported here Hekate Sep 2013 #14

You claim to not know what a "bankster" is, but you claim that the DOJ has gone after 3000. AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #15

Pffft... this is no bombshell... ljm2002 Sep 2013 #5

To quote a supreme court justice from a bygone era: surrealAmerican Sep 2013 #6

Kick Luminous Animal Sep 2013 #7

Kick. Again. Luminous Animal Sep 2013 #8

I just want to point out that those of us who responeded to Snowden with a "meh" Recursion Sep 2013 #11

One should consider what the government is doing ConcernedCanuk Sep 2013 #16