Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I might take a break from this place if Obama nominates Summers. [View all]AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)83. Next round? He could repeat an action related to the loss of 8 Senate races and 54 House seats.
Democrats and Independents are divided on a particular issue, although there are some who claim to be the spokesmen for liberals and the Democratic Party.
In his autobiography, Bill Clinton analyzed the loss of Democratic control of Congress which the Democratic Party had enjoyed since the 1950's.
In his book "My Life," in which he analyzed the loss of Congress to the Republicans in 1994, he wrote:"Just before the House vote (on the crime bill), Speaker Tom Foley and majority leader Dick Gephardt had made a last-ditch appeal to me to remove the assault weapons ban from the bill. They argued that many Democrats who represented closely divided districts had already...defied the NRA once on the Brady bill vote. They said that if we made them walk the plank again on the assault weapons ban, the overall bill might not pass, and that if it did, many Democrats who voted for it would not survive the election in November. Jack Brooks, the House Judiciary Committee chairman from Texas, told me the same thing...Jack was convinced that if we didn't drop the ban, the NRA would beat a lot of Democrats by terrifying gun owners....Foley, Gephardt, and Brooks were right and I was wrong. The price...would be heavy casualties among its defenders." (Pages 611-612)
"On November 8, we got the living daylights beat out of us, losing eight Senate races and fifty-four House seats, the largest defeat for our party since 1946....The NRA had a great night. They beat both Speaker Tom Foley and Jack Brooks, two of the ablest members of Congress, who had warned me this would happen. Foley was the first Speaker to be defeated in more than a century. Jack Brooks had supported the NRA for years and had led the fight against the assault weapons ban in the House, but as chairman of the Judiciary Committee he had voted for the overall crime bill even after the ban was put into it. The NRA was an unforgiving master: one strike and you're out. The gun lobby claimed to have defeated nineteen of the twenty-four members on its hit list. They did at least that much damage...." (Pages 629-630)
http://www.gunshopfinder.com/legislativenews/clinton8_1_04.html
If Obama wants to further divide Democrats and Independents, he can keep pushing the gun control or gun prohibition issue.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
158 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Next round? He could repeat an action related to the loss of 8 Senate races and 54 House seats.
AnotherMcIntosh
Sep 2013
#83
oh, i can't wait to see how the bog spins his nomination. should be good for a chuckle or 2
KG
Sep 2013
#7
“We are surely a kinder and gentler nation because of you and we can’t thank you enough.”
panzerfaust
Sep 2013
#43
I'm just hoping that I'll just throw up once after the announcement and then my stomach
CTyankee
Sep 2013
#13
Well I get laughed at and scorned by some here but I still say flood the WhiteHouse.gov site
kelliekat44
Sep 2013
#19
hated Geithner can't abide Summers. I can understand Syria though not support it all.
KittyWampus
Sep 2013
#30
Trumad you were and are a cornerstone and a pillar of strength around here.
Rebellious Republican
Sep 2013
#41
Wow ...so finally now I can take you off ignore ...and may I welcome you to the dark side...
L0oniX
Sep 2013
#55
one has to wonder if this is the WH floating Summers' name or his advocates trying to make him seem
KittyWampus
Sep 2013
#51
As we, as the People, have the right to express our approve or disapproval as we deem fit
Jack Rabbit
Sep 2013
#147
LOL. Right. THAT will be the move to the HARD RIGHT that breaks the camel's back for you...
Romulox
Sep 2013
#48
I'm just providing the information, not arguing for or against its controversial nature.
Jackpine Radical
Sep 2013
#94
Wow ...never thought I would say this ...I agree with you and feel the same way ...and
L0oniX
Sep 2013
#57
I know what you mean, trumad. For me, Obama has been like a wierd girlfriend that...
BlueJazz
Sep 2013
#66
It should be fun to at least watch the apologists spin this latest gift to Wall Street...
truebrit71
Sep 2013
#96
No. No close your eyes, trumad. Bull no knocked up. He glad that man is buy-partisan...
Octafish
Sep 2013
#104
I can't stand Summers, but if he's nominated, the 2014 election will be even more important
Squinch
Sep 2013
#125
Senator Warren can always place his nomination ''on hold,'' and let it die there.
DeSwiss
Sep 2013
#129
I know you are a supporter of our President, and I understand why you feel this way about
Grateful for Hope
Sep 2013
#131