How did a group dedicated to discussion regarding a Democratic POTUS, on an ostensibly ...

[DevonRex]

268. He wrote the last 2 paragraphs & they're against the SOP. AND

The post he replied to had our standard warning that it was posted in the Barack Obama Group, not in a forum.

The paragraphs that don't comply with the SOP:

"If the U.S. attacks Syria in any way or for any reason, the commander in chief and other responsible parties in his administration becomes a war criminal under international law, and since that treaty was ratified by Congress, under U.S. law as well, although we both know that won't be enforced. How do we know that? BHO would join a fraternity of war criminals that most recently welcomed Bush, Cheney, Rice, and Rumsfeld in waging aggressive war and using American exceptionalism to justify it. They're still walking free, so war criminals have every expectation of not being prosecuted in the U.S..

There's no question of "validity" here, or at least none that I can see. Ban Ki Moon reiterated yesterday that any U.S. attack absent immediate self defense would be a crime against humanity."

You and he may think that is all true. Nevertheless, it clearly violates the SOP. Since the OP contained a warning that it was in the Barack Obama Group it was assumed the disruption was intentional. Many of our OPs have warnings now because we have so many people who drop in to visit. Usually when there's a crisis like Syria so they can tell us where to go. So nice of them.