How did a group dedicated to discussion regarding a Democratic POTUS, on an ostensibly ...

[MADem]

348. Nice attempt at distraction. Clumsy, desperate, and obvious, but done with verve!

Let's make one thing PERFECTLY CLEAR (to use a Presidential phrase from 20th Century History): We aren't discussing "the President's (SIC) policy."

We are discussing THE BOG, the RULES of the BOG, and why you seem to have a hard time with them.

One more time, since you didn't take the point that I made very clearly and carefully the first time around:

You are FREE to "criticize the President's (SIC) policy on drone killings" -- in LBN or GD or the Video forum or even in the Environmental Group if it works for you.

You talk about indifference? I'll tell you what you're indifferent to--basic declarative sentences in the English language.

You aren't going to get your way, and waaaah-waaaah-waaahing at me about something other than the topic at hand (the topic is the BOG, not Presidential policy--to reiterate that to you, since you seem to be confused about that) ain't gonna fly.

I take it you're banned from the BOG. I certainly hope so, anyway--it's obvious that you have nothing to contribute to that group, owing to your POV re: the POTUS.

Flail away all you'd like. You don't have a right to be treated like you're "special" and the rules don't apply to you. You behave badly and you don't get invited back. Funny, that kind of 'policy' works very well in bars, restaurants, nightclubs, theaters, hotels, airlines, etc.....so why shouldn't it work here at DU as well?

Thing is, it does work here at DU, in the BOG. And that makes the BOG....

NICE.