Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)

9. Care to be more clear on your comment? Name someone here eg, who

Reply to geek tragedy (Reply #7)

Tue Oct 22, 2013, 04:17 PM

Oct 2013

is part of that 'y'all'? I don't think we can decipher correctly comments that appear to refer to nothing that is part of the topic. But perhaps you see something the rest of us don't see, so explaining where you got this, which to me, and I could be wrong and do not want to misjudge anyone, is a not so subtle implication that DUers, who btw, ALWAYS opposed the Drone Program going way way back, are actually Tea Baggers.

That is NOT what you are implying I'm sure, but I'm sure I'm not going to be the only one who might wrongfully think that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Drone strikes killing more civilians than U.S. admits, human rights groups say [View all] woo me with science Oct 2013 OP

K&R Solly Mack Oct 2013 #1

Aw well, AI and HRW are well known Obama Haters and on Rove's payroll. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2013 #2

It's about time this issue got attention. I remember when Bush was sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #3

"now look what Nader/Republican governor-saboteurs did!" nt MisterP Oct 2013 #31

but it is much easier to just call all drone victims "terrorists"! quinnox Oct 2013 #4

thanks for the thread cali Oct 2013 #5

You're raining on the love parade man! Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #6

Well, y'all can start your impeachment drive any time you like. nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #7

of course no one is suggesting any such thing cali Oct 2013 #8

No, what I care about is people discuss all angles of the story. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #10

So we are there for humanitarian reasons? That worked out well for Libya Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #18

Nice link. Was Rense.com down? geek tragedy Oct 2013 #19

When someone cites Max Forte they are automatically discredited. joshcryer Oct 2013 #26

Excellent link. woo me with science Oct 2013 #22

Wow, Greg Shupak's views on privitizing libraries is disgusting. joshcryer Oct 2013 #25

derp. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #13

Care to be more clear on your comment? Name someone here eg, who sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #9

i've never seen this kind of "worship" for a president noiretextatique Oct 2013 #15

Or perhaps there is a propaganda machine now in place woo me with science Oct 2013 #16

Thank you. I'm still waiting for an explanation. But I have little expectation sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #20

some call it noiretextatique Oct 2013 #33

600 out of 2200 is much, much better than ground combat Recursion Oct 2013 #11

I suggest reading the AI report. I also suggest we stop acting like cali Oct 2013 #12

What do *you* think Pakistan would do if we stopped the drone program? Recursion Oct 2013 #14

Erm, they can be easily shot down. joshcryer Oct 2013 #24

Yeah, so Obama is 100x less murderous than Bush. joshcryer Oct 2013 #23

That pretty much describes why Pakistan is on board Recursion Oct 2013 #27

And, of course, if the US does stop... joshcryer Oct 2013 #28

I guess the 64K question here is Recursion Oct 2013 #29

As you said, we'll see. joshcryer Oct 2013 #30

K & R !!! WillyT Oct 2013 #17

kick woo me with science Oct 2013 #21

du rec. xchrom Oct 2013 #32