Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's Get Down To Brass Tacks... WHY... Would Barack Obama, And Fellow Dems Support The... [View all]CrispyQ
(41,051 posts)85. SS is not running out of money.
If SS is in such dire straights, then the federal govt should pay back what they've borrowed from it. Point is, they don't want to!
Social Security -- the most fiscally responsible program
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sen-don-riegle/post_1901_b_845106.html
snip...
Social Security is self-financed, cannot borrow, spends less than one percent on its administrative costs, has a $2.6 trillion surplus which will continue to grow for a number of years, and is off-budget. It does not contribute to the federal deficit or the debt. The Social Security surplus is invested in US Treasuries which enables the federal government to borrow less from other sources. The government borrows these Social Security funds to pay for other government spending -- but is obligated to pay interest on these borrowings -- and pay back the borrowed funds in full when they are needed by Social Security for benefit payments.
more...
Pay Back Social Security -- The Government Has Borrowed More from Social Security than any Other Entity or Foreign Government
According to the U.S. Treasury Department's "Monthly Statement of the Public Debt of the United States" (9.30.10), the total debt was $13.562 trillion and was held as follows:
US Holders of Debt
42.1 % -- US Individuals and Institutions
17.9 % -- Social Security Trust Fund
6.0 % -- US Civil Service Retirement Fund
2.1 % -- US Military Retirement Fund
Foreign Holders of Debt
11.7 % -- Oil Exporting Countries
9.5 % -- China and Hong Kong
6.3 % -- Japan
1.4 % -- United Kingdom
1.3 % -- Brazil
1.6 % -- All other foreign countries
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sen-don-riegle/post_1901_b_845106.html
snip...
Social Security is self-financed, cannot borrow, spends less than one percent on its administrative costs, has a $2.6 trillion surplus which will continue to grow for a number of years, and is off-budget. It does not contribute to the federal deficit or the debt. The Social Security surplus is invested in US Treasuries which enables the federal government to borrow less from other sources. The government borrows these Social Security funds to pay for other government spending -- but is obligated to pay interest on these borrowings -- and pay back the borrowed funds in full when they are needed by Social Security for benefit payments.
more...
Pay Back Social Security -- The Government Has Borrowed More from Social Security than any Other Entity or Foreign Government
According to the U.S. Treasury Department's "Monthly Statement of the Public Debt of the United States" (9.30.10), the total debt was $13.562 trillion and was held as follows:
US Holders of Debt
42.1 % -- US Individuals and Institutions
17.9 % -- Social Security Trust Fund
6.0 % -- US Civil Service Retirement Fund
2.1 % -- US Military Retirement Fund
Foreign Holders of Debt
11.7 % -- Oil Exporting Countries
9.5 % -- China and Hong Kong
6.3 % -- Japan
1.4 % -- United Kingdom
1.3 % -- Brazil
1.6 % -- All other foreign countries
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let's Get Down To Brass Tacks... WHY... Would Barack Obama, And Fellow Dems Support The... [View all]
WillyT
Oct 2013
OP
Here's a new question: Why would a Democratic Underground member even ask this question....
NYC_SKP
Oct 2013
#8
You demanded links and info you could refute. You got them. Now you're ignoring them.
Marr
Oct 2013
#78
You know, it's a courtesy to provide context. People are busy, people are working....
NYC_SKP
Oct 2013
#17
In exchange for tax increases on the wealthy... That's about all they'd do it for
scheming daemons
Oct 2013
#14
Given the history, it would be natural to wonder why he is doing this now? What's the catch?
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#76
So... You'd Be OK With A New Rule Starting With 55 Year Olds... 45 Year Olds ???
WillyT
Oct 2013
#21
lol. thanks! it's been a couple of years or so since it's been in daily talking points
Pretzel_Warrior
Oct 2013
#26
If There Is A Not Better Time... To Promote Taxing The Rich... I Don't Know What Would Be...
WillyT
Oct 2013
#49
If we want to save SS and Medicare we shouldn't be cutting funding. We should be increasing funding
liberal_at_heart
Oct 2013
#44
Because they believe they can survive the results better than Republicans who let taxes rise
Bolo Boffin
Oct 2013
#46