I've kinda had it with all of the BS

[JDPriestly]

75. Hillary Clinton is just more corruption.

Elizabeth Warren is no or at least less corruption.

We just have to have one president who says no to corruption.

I want Elizabeth Warren in the White House. She will take a fresh look at all kinds of things and ask for real analysis. For example, I would like to see her sit with the leadership of the NSA and analyze what surveillance is really useful and needed and what isn't. I don't think anyone has done the. They are all afraid of each other.

Hillary is just another jaded politician. Elizabeth Warren is no revolutionary. She is not anti-Wall Street. She is just fair-minded. We need Elizabeth Warren. We really do. I kind of feel that at this time she is our only hope for clean, just, wise but humble leadership. And if we don't get clean, just, wise and humble leadership in the White House in 2016, we will probably face a terrible fate as will our children and grandchildren. Under the corrupt leadership that we have had since maybe 1963, we have done some really awful damage to parts of the world and in some cases here at home. It is going to take an Elizabeth Warren to heal the damage we have done.

God help us if we get more of the Clinton/Obama corruption. Both nice people, but too close to too much corruption. And I say that as one who likes Obama. I think he is a really good man, but I recognize that he is surrounded by corruption. He owes or at least thinks he owes too much to the corrupt system he finds himself in. It's a terrible pressure. We need someone independent like Elizabeth Warren. She would be a terrific candidate. And she is really fair. Wall Street would have nothing to fear. It would probably thrive more than it would under Hillary. Why? Because people would have more confidence in the economy.