Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
38. It's not a step closer to single payer
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 06:24 PM
Nov 2013

and repeating that isn't going to make it true. It locked into law the fact that every single American pays money to those blood suckers. It is a step away from SP. And, nothing the Heritage Foundation has ever done will ever help the people of this country in any way

Obamacare is not a disaster [View all] Harmony Blue Nov 2013 OP
I agree and I often say exactly what you did kydo Nov 2013 #1
I understand how consveratives Harmony Blue Nov 2013 #2
I also agree with the OP brush Nov 2013 #36
Absolutely Harmony Blue Nov 2013 #50
Some very smart, articulate person needs to compare what people NOW spend w/ insurance loudsue Nov 2013 #3
+1 historylovr Nov 2013 #29
ACA originated at the Heritage Foundation Doctor_J Nov 2013 #33
Keep in mind . . . brush Nov 2013 #37
It's not a step closer to single payer Doctor_J Nov 2013 #38
That's your opinion. brush Nov 2013 #41
How can requiring by law that Big Insurance keeps 20% of EVERYONE'S HC bill Doctor_J Nov 2013 #43
Weren't they keeping a lot more before the ACA? brush Nov 2013 #44
After the costs of adjudicating claims, etc., at best there is roughly 10% for risk and profits Hoyt Nov 2013 #51
if the eventual goal is getting them out of the system, then locking them in is Doctor_J Nov 2013 #56
As folks pointed out, it took 40+ years to get there and there were no Republican obstructionists. Hoyt Nov 2013 #57
How do you foresee this conversion from ACA to Universal happening? StrayKat Nov 2013 #4
The OP is sort of a silly vanity post to get a lot of rec's Doctor_J Nov 2013 #7
Uhhhh... SoapBox Nov 2013 #8
Possibly. StrayKat Nov 2013 #9
You're talking about people who buy their insurance on the open market . . . brush Nov 2013 #39
Yes, people who buy their own insurance. StrayKat Nov 2013 #47
K & R Iliyah Nov 2013 #5
Nah, it is not the start of a real plan. Don't let wishful thinking make you dumb Doctor_J Nov 2013 #6
What percentage of the 3 trillion . . . brush Nov 2013 #42
K & R SoapBox Nov 2013 #10
Didn't Canada take lie 17 years to fully enact a single payer system? JaneyVee Nov 2013 #11
More like 40... SidDithers Nov 2013 #14
Canada never had a trillion-dollar private insurance industry that owned the government Doctor_J Nov 2013 #22
And we have taken something like 66 years so far. RC Nov 2013 #34
I agree. But it's a first step. JaneyVee Nov 2013 #49
Insurance is by it's very nature inherently "socialist". n/t. cheapdate Nov 2013 #12
actually private insurance is pure capitalism Doctor_J Nov 2013 #18
Collectivist is probably a better word Major Nikon Nov 2013 #30
You're thinking of nonprofit things like Medicare n/t leftstreet Nov 2013 #23
DU rec... SidDithers Nov 2013 #13
It looks like Vermont will also have universal coverage with premiums based on income Major Nikon Nov 2013 #31
I'm skeptical this will ever turn into universal single payer medical care KentuckyWoman Nov 2013 #15
I think we'll have to have this for a generation or two OmahaBlueDog Nov 2013 #17
So in 50 years we might get Big Insurance out of the death business? And that's good? Doctor_J Nov 2013 #46
However for those of us who aren't affluent and are over 55 - truedelphi Nov 2013 #35
This 'DLC type" agrees. wyldwolf Nov 2013 #16
That link makes it pretty clear that PNHP thinks ACA is nothing like health care Doctor_J Nov 2013 #19
yes, it does. But, IMHO, the ACA (as written) is better than the former system wyldwolf Nov 2013 #20
Fewer Americans are shit out of luck, but it is not a step toward cutting off the insurance Doctor_J Nov 2013 #48
We'll see, so far it certainly looks that way quinnox Nov 2013 #21
It is only a 'disaster' if it fails leftstreet Nov 2013 #24
The whole world is laughing at us.... Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #25
Its nothing yet in terms of success/failure NoOneMan Nov 2013 #26
Medicare had it's kinks, too, when it first was implemented. Look at it now. demosincebirth Nov 2013 #27
Yep, 30% of beneficiaries choose insurance company Medicare Advantage Plans, all drugs are Hoyt Nov 2013 #53
While you make some good points, LWolf Nov 2013 #28
No, it's not a disaster... ReRe Nov 2013 #32
The ACA is AWESOME for early retirees and people that can qualify for expanded Medicaid. kelly1mm Nov 2013 #40
Uh, if we had HC like the civilized countries you wouldn't be paying anything Doctor_J Nov 2013 #45
uh, as the OP stated, Obamacare (ACA) is not a disaster. Some people, (me included) are getting kelly1mm Nov 2013 #55
Come back in five years, and we will talk about it. duffyduff Nov 2013 #52
Obamacare may not be single payer CFLDem Nov 2013 #54
Agreed Justice Nov 2013 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obamacare is not a disast...»Reply #38