Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Noah's Ark - Nov. 22, 1963 [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)27. We could have rebuilt the energy grid with 100% renewable systems for the cost of the Iraq war...
Of course, this would impact our nation's strategic petroleum industry's annual revenues...
For the Price of the Iraq War, The U.S. Could Have a 100% Renewable Power System
By Washington's Blog
Global Research, April 11, 2013
What Are We Choosing for Our Future?
Wind energy expert Paul Gipe reported this week that for the amount spent on the Iraq war the U.S. could be generating 40%-60% of its electricity with renewable energy:
Disregarding the human cost, and disregarding our other war in Afghanistan, how much renewable energy could we have built with the money we spent? How far along the road toward the renewable energy transition could we have traveled?
The answer: shockingly far.
Cost of the Iraq War
The war in Iraq has cost $1.7 trillion through fiscal year 2013, according to Brown Universitys Watson Institute for International Studies. Thats trillion, with a t. Including future costs for veterans care, and so on, raises the cost to $2.2 trillion.
SNIP...
If we had invested the $2.2 trillion in wind and solar, the US would be generating 21% of its electricity with renewable energy. If we had invested the $3.9 trillion that the war in Iraq will ultimately cost, we would generate nearly 40% of our electricity with new renewables. Combined with the 10% of supply from existing hydroelectricity, the US could have surpassed 50% of total renewables in supply.
However, this is a conservative estimate. If we include the reasonable assumptions suggested by Robert Freehling, the contribution by renewables would be even greater.
Freehlings assumptions raise to as much as 60% the nations lost potential contribution by new renewables to US electricity supply by going to war in Iraq. With the addition of existing hydroelectric generation, the opportunity to develop as much as 70% of our nations electricity with renewable energy was lost.
And unlike the war in Iraq, which is an expense, the development of renewable energy instead of war would have been an investment in infrastructure at home that would have paid dividends to American citizens for decades to come.
CONTINUED...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/for-the-price-of-the-iraq-war-the-u-s-could-have-a-100-renewable-power-system/5330881
Our "capitalist system" has become a form of slavery. I am most grateful to know so many are not afraid to see it for what it is.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As a former member of the ASA, I can attest to many of Bamford's accounts around the
alfredo
Nov 2013
#20
Former President Harry S Truman's CIA Op-Ed that ran for PART of one day in The Washington Post...
Octafish
Dec 2013
#31
It appeared to me that the intelligence professional was more like Colonel Flagg of MASH and
alfredo
Dec 2013
#32
We could have rebuilt the energy grid with 100% renewable systems for the cost of the Iraq war...
Octafish
Dec 2013
#27
I think shit would've turned out VERY different w/ Nixon in the WH during the Cuban Missile crisis.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#11