Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

RandySF

(58,903 posts)
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 11:17 PM Dec 2013

Hillary comforts the crying bankers. [View all]

Ordinarily these masters of the universe might have groaned at the idea of a politician taking the microphone. In the contentious years since the crash of 2008, they’ve grown wearily accustomed to being called names—labeled “fat cats" by President Obama and worse by those on the left—and gotten used to being largely shunned by Tea Party Republicans for their association with the Washington establishment. And of course there are all those infuriating new rules and regulations, culminating this week with the imposition of the so-called Volcker Rule to make risky trades by big banks illegal.

But Clinton offered a message that the collected plutocrats found reassuring, according to accounts offered by several attendees, declaring that the banker-bashing so popular within both political parties was unproductive and indeed foolish. Striking a soothing note on the global financial crisis, she told the audience, in effect: We all got into this mess together, and we’re all going to have to work together to get out of it. What the bankers heard her to say was just what they would hope for from a prospective presidential candidate: Beating up the finance industry isn’t going to improve the economy—it needs to stop. And indeed Goldman’s Jim O’Neill, the laconic Brit who heads the bank’s asset management division, introduced Clinton by saying how courageous she was for speaking at the bank. (Brave, perhaps, but also well-compensated: Clinton’s minimum fee for paid remarks is $200,000).

Certainly, Clinton offered the money men—and, yes, they are mostly men—at Goldman’s HQ a bit of a morale boost. “It was like, ‘Here’s someone who doesn’t want to vilify us but wants to get business back in the game,’” said at an attendee. “Like, maybe here’s someone who can lead us out of the wilderness.”

Clinton’s remarks were hardly a sweeping absolution for the sins of Wall Street, whose leaders she courted assiduously for financial support over a decade, as a senator and a presidential candidate in 2008. But they did register as a repudiation of some of the angry anti-Wall Street rhetoric emanating from liberals rallying behind the likes of Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio). And perhaps even more than that, Clinton’s presence offered a glimpse to a future in which Wall Street might repair its frayed political relationships.


http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2013/12/wall-street-white-house-republicans-lament-of-the-plutocrats-101047.html#ixzz2nE8CPfhJ

77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lobbyists represent real people, dammit! MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #1
OOPS I think we will be seeing more of this soon warrant46 Dec 2013 #57
I'm so thrilled to see her compassion for this despised and misunderstood minority. (nt) Jackpine Radical Dec 2013 #76
Brown/Warren 2016. nt Deep13 Dec 2013 #2
I could support that ticket! NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #4
I'm down with that ticket. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #10
Yep. Changing over legislative leadership is needed pretty badly as well TheKentuckian Dec 2013 #12
Electing Sen Warren as vp would be such a waste. Either president or Senator. nm rhett o rick Dec 2013 #18
Actually, yeah, I agree. nt Deep13 Dec 2013 #26
All they do is win and whine BeyondGeography Dec 2013 #3
I am trying not to think about 2016 yet. Brigid Dec 2013 #5
I will not vote for Hillary. Sanders yes. 3rd party if it comes down to it. Katashi_itto Dec 2013 #47
Go Third way! Phlem Dec 2013 #6
And she's off and running! polichick Dec 2013 #7
The Oligarchs And Corporations Own And Control The Politicians That Own And Control Us cantbeserious Dec 2013 #8
you don`t need a weatherman..... madrchsod Dec 2013 #9
...and it ain't with any of us. n/t Chan790 Dec 2013 #50
"We all got into this mess together," dchill Dec 2013 #11
Voting for that mentality is "Chickens for Colonel Sanders" territory on the best day. TheKentuckian Dec 2013 #14
"Together"? What a load. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #15
yeh, I don't get this together thing either. Whisp Dec 2013 #23
Uh-huh. A big load. QuestForSense Dec 2013 #25
Yeah, what's this "we" crap, Ms. I-Get-200-Grand-Per-Speech? nt Buns_of_Fire Dec 2013 #35
I'm wondering what's with this "we" bullshit myself. HappyMe Dec 2013 #38
That's just what she hopes the rest of us to buy into. She's bull$hitting us and letting those SammyWinstonJack Dec 2013 #44
completely insulting in every way G_j Dec 2013 #54
seriously, I'm partially to blame. I bought a home I could afford magical thyme Dec 2013 #64
surprise surprise surprise! irisblue Dec 2013 #13
Hillary Clinton/Max Baucus 2016 Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #16
How ironic that Citizens United may help Clinton win the nomination. A Clinton vs. Christie ticket rhett o rick Dec 2013 #17
$200,000 upi402 Dec 2013 #19
I'm Not Sure This was Winning Play For 2016 colsohlibgal Dec 2013 #20
The problem is, which populist nominee would be able to raise a billion (or more...) Amonester Dec 2013 #29
I think Howard Dean proved that you can crowdsource/crowdfund a semi-populist campaign foo_bar Dec 2013 #32
That's one of the first reasons why a Public Campaign Funding Act is badly needed Amonester Dec 2013 #36
Hillary a clue? Good one! I am pissed beyond belief with her Wall Street love affair. Vote for her? Never! InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2013 #33
WOW! 'Clinton’s minimum fee for paid remarks is $200,000.' n/t freshwest Dec 2013 #21
(See my #29 reply just above.) Amonester Dec 2013 #30
Makes sense. And ot as much as Romney charged for dinners. freshwest Dec 2013 #31
Yes, and Hillary's fee can run upward of a cool half million. No favors expected of course. Surely, we can do better. InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2013 #34
but she logged in so many air miles while SoS! Whisp Dec 2013 #72
That's a lot of Lettuce !! warrant46 Dec 2013 #45
Nominating her is national suicide LittleBlue Dec 2013 #22
This is why I don't like Hillary Clinton. JDPriestly Dec 2013 #24
yep /\/\/\ dembotoz Dec 2013 #42
Hillary SamKnause Dec 2013 #27
Well, to be fair. She probably isn't incuding US, the little people, in that statement. sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #66
Reply SamKnause Dec 2013 #69
Nominate Hillary, say hello to President Christie. Sounds like a win-win strategy to Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #28
"Back in the game" n2doc Dec 2013 #37
This is why Hillary Clinton should not ever be POTUS. 99Forever Dec 2013 #39
‘Here’s someone who doesn’t want to vilify us but wants to get business back in the game’ deutsey Dec 2013 #40
I didn't really need a reminder .. sendero Dec 2013 #41
$200,000 worth of a$$ ki$$ing for all involved. SammyWinstonJack Dec 2013 #43
Ms. Clinton, please meet Iceland solarhydrocan Dec 2013 #46
I will not vote for a 3rd Rail Democrat Katashi_itto Dec 2013 #48
Is this the daily or weekly thread of "let's bash Hillary until 2016"? Beacool Dec 2013 #49
It's a factual report. Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #51
I think that this continual wringing of the hands is unnecessary drama. Beacool Dec 2013 #53
Yup. HappyMe Dec 2013 #55
Of course there will be criticism, but this constant almost daily bashing is just ridiculous. Beacool Dec 2013 #58
Facts aren't bashing. HappyMe Dec 2013 #59
And maybe some of you should hold back your vitriol. Beacool Dec 2013 #61
Yeah, you're pom-poms are about how HappyMe Dec 2013 #62
I wasn't one of those "cheerefully campaigning for Obama in 2008" Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #56
Emotional reactions is what I see on many of these type of posts. Beacool Dec 2013 #60
What's her "vision" - to give what's left of this country to her corporate friends? polichick Dec 2013 #70
a "rookie"? DonCoquixote Dec 2013 #75
I still cheer loudly for the President Whisp Dec 2013 #71
Rats! Someone already snagged this Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #52
Better than Hillary is 44 - which is filled with a bunch of racist PUMA assholes. Drunken Irishman Dec 2013 #67
there is this PUMA asshole. Definitive. Whisp Dec 2013 #73
If Hillary didn't pull stunts like this, there wouldn't be articles written about her. Major Hogwash Dec 2013 #63
Finally letting us know what her platform will look like... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2013 #65
She's sure right about one thing... polichick Dec 2013 #68
$ Wilms Dec 2013 #74
NEXT !!! WillyT Dec 2013 #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary comforts the cryi...