Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ENENEWS Fukushima Update: 12-13-2013 [View all]RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)35. Actually, swept into the ocean
There is no other solution. They can't even get close to the 3 damaged reactors that are said to be melted into the ground. Into the ground where the nuclear cores are met by slow running water. Water that slowly makes it to the pacific just yards away.
For a hundred or more years, this polluted water will be bubbling into the ocean. The ocean has a current that flows due east to the US. So, for at least a hundred years there will be a stream of nuclear pollution waving up on the US west coast. May already be there. Probably is. Lots of sea-life dyng and acting weird already.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Beware the Pro-Nuke crowd here, they will do everything they can to discredit the sources
Katashi_itto
Dec 2013
#4
GMO mutant food? That statement alone disqualifies you from being a source of rational discussion. n
eqfan592
Dec 2013
#50
If I had millions to spend on propaganda, Internet Trolls, and phony 'studies', then I'm sure...
Berlum
Dec 2013
#51
Screw that, I'm screaming like Ruby Rap at the top of my lungs like I was on a roller coaster!
DeSwiss
Dec 2013
#18
'How can one even begin to understand unconditional love if one has no hope at all for the future?''
DeSwiss
Dec 2013
#53