Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Utah Is on Track to End Homelessness by 2015 With This One Simple Idea [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)73. No, you don't
A 2007 primer on guidelines that states:
Categorical eligibility
In order to secure Medicaid eligibility, a person must fall into a statutorily recognized category or eligibility group. There are six broad coverage groups: children, pregnant women, adults in families with dependent children, people with disabilities (adults and children), persons who are blind, and older persons.
In order to secure Medicaid eligibility, a person must fall into a statutorily recognized category or eligibility group. There are six broad coverage groups: children, pregnant women, adults in families with dependent children, people with disabilities (adults and children), persons who are blind, and older persons.
Not a single person outside of those categories was eligible, and most states made no effort to provide those services to even those who fell into the existing categories.
Look at the California program's limitations.
The reason for the expansion was to extend Medicaid to all low-income Americans.
In fact, federal workers' children and legal immigrants were also excluded from Medicaid/CHIP until 2009.
Until now, legal immigrants have generally been barred from Medicaid and the State Childrens Health Insurance Program for five years after they enter the United States. States will now be able to cover those immigrants without the five-year delay.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/05/us/politics/05health.html
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/05/us/politics/05health.html
Low-income state workers begin to gain access to Childrens Health Insurance Program
By Sarah Barr
At least six states have opened their Childrens Health Insurance Program to the kids of low-income state employees, an option that was prohibited until the passage of the 2010 health-care law.
This relatively small step has as its backdrop years of debate over the program, known as CHIP, including concerns that it encourages states and consumers to replace private insurance with taxpayer-subsidized coverage.
Now, as a result of the policy change, families of lower-income state workers who have struggled to pay for family coverage can qualify for the program. CHIP, which is jointly financed by the states and the federal government, provides coverage to the uninsured children of families who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid but cannot afford private insurance.
The federal government had closed that option to most states when CHIP was established in 1997, because of concerns that it might be an easy way for financially strapped states to shift the costs of some public-employee health benefits to the federal government. Federal employees were allowed to enroll their children.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/2011/11/04/gIQAeDvotM_story.html
By Sarah Barr
At least six states have opened their Childrens Health Insurance Program to the kids of low-income state employees, an option that was prohibited until the passage of the 2010 health-care law.
This relatively small step has as its backdrop years of debate over the program, known as CHIP, including concerns that it encourages states and consumers to replace private insurance with taxpayer-subsidized coverage.
Now, as a result of the policy change, families of lower-income state workers who have struggled to pay for family coverage can qualify for the program. CHIP, which is jointly financed by the states and the federal government, provides coverage to the uninsured children of families who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid but cannot afford private insurance.
The federal government had closed that option to most states when CHIP was established in 1997, because of concerns that it might be an easy way for financially strapped states to shift the costs of some public-employee health benefits to the federal government. Federal employees were allowed to enroll their children.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/2011/11/04/gIQAeDvotM_story.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
U forgot the sarcasm smiley.. By definition if someone has a home then they are not homeless.
geckosfeet
Dec 2013
#5
Republican State Gives Free Houses to Moochers, Cuts Homelessness by 74 Percent
ProSense
Dec 2013
#7
I'm not sure how far it will go, but it won't come to WI with this legislature.
HereSince1628
Dec 2013
#11
The only way this will sink in with economic conservatives is with the value of the dollar
Harmony Blue
Dec 2013
#12
I remember that.. conservative radio called the housing wino hotels, or something. It is logical and
freshwest
Dec 2013
#47
If Obama was all over this and trying to promote it, we know what the result would be.
madinmaryland
Dec 2013
#43
"Do you think the Right Wing could get any MORE crazy?" Yes and Fuck Yes.
madinmaryland
Dec 2013
#93
I have always found Utah to be a strange state. It has some of the most developed
bluestate10
Dec 2013
#22
These apartments will be privately owned, rents collected for profit, not some
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2013
#62
Used to work in the administration of a city homeless shelter. Utah has the right approach.
JDPriestly
Dec 2013
#31
It always seemed to me that, in "Red States", they jump to the opportunity
King_Klonopin
Dec 2013
#56
Food, Shelter and Clothing should be provided to anyone who can't get that for themselves.
harun
Dec 2013
#72
UTAH???? a holiday miracle, indeed. I have been advocating for the same thing in my oh-so-red
niyad
Dec 2013
#75