Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren Comes Down Hard Against Global Warming, Separates Herself From Hillary Clinton [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)343. Video is FOREVER!
If you are having problems.
take it up with Hillary.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
426 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Elizabeth Warren Comes Down Hard Against Global Warming, Separates Herself From Hillary Clinton [View all]
KoKo
Dec 2013
OP
You say "stirring the pot" as if that was a bad thing. It's way past time to stir the pot.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#9
Changing the subject because one can't address the rank unfairness that is the thesis of this
MADem
Dec 2013
#141
You can do what you want--vote as you please. Pull the lever for Christie or Rand Paul, for all I
MADem
Dec 2013
#187
"Do what you want" is pretty plain. Don't behave like an aggrieved and put upon voter
MADem
Dec 2013
#254
I'm here to advocate for the policies of the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party.
WowSeriously
Dec 2013
#270
You've been here for just over a month, and your tone, attitude and demeanor are
MADem
Dec 2013
#284
I have never had any "email exchanges" with you--so I'm not sure what you're on about.
MADem
Dec 2013
#317
Like the Obama partisans didn't throw HIM under the bus, either, when he didn't satisfy their every
MADem
Dec 2013
#54
Oh, gee, if I keep tryin' real hard, maybe I'll figure it out. It's just so hard an' all, I need
MADem
Dec 2013
#66
The candidates who -- with the exception of Al Gore, who wuz robbed-- get the most votes
MADem
Dec 2013
#156
FDR had no problem violating the Constitutional rights of US citizens based on their race.
MADem
Dec 2013
#278
The article isn't about Hillary. It's really about Warren versus the establishment.
NYC_SKP
Dec 2013
#282
Hillary is arguably the single most representative person in the Democratic establishment.
NYC_SKP
Dec 2013
#301
No doubt there. Sadly, Hillary and Obama have more in common with each other than they do...
NYC_SKP
Dec 2013
#345
Are you really going to argue that environmental stewardship is some radical far left position that
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#34
What "facts?" That HRC isn't in public life now, that she was subordinate to the POTUS and
MADem
Dec 2013
#86
Only someone who doesn't "get" how it works would think that a SECSTATE isn't subordinate to their
MADem
Dec 2013
#99
If you don't understand that the job of cabinet officials is to execute the POTUS's policy, I can't
MADem
Dec 2013
#194
You deserve a freaking medal. Good Lord, just READING this hysterical exchange has made me tired
Number23
Dec 2013
#238
Interesting that they are trying to sell Clinton as "eight more years of the status quo". nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#259
Yes and no - in diplomacy with other countries, he has to make offers acceptable (and pre approved)
karynnj
Dec 2013
#275
And I assume you would support her no matter who she selected for her cabinet.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#260
I do think she'll make good choices, but I'd not be afraid to criticize a bad pick.
MADem
Dec 2013
#268
I think she's a moderate--like Elizabeth Warren is--on most issues, and liberal on others.
MADem
Dec 2013
#286
I will be glad to "whack" anyone that supports the Patriot Act. Why do I single her out?
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#292
They are not running for president, but Goldman-Sachs-Clinton is running for president.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#296
Well, you said you'd be glad to whack them, and now you change your mind and single out just one.
MADem
Dec 2013
#308
You keep changing the focus. But I will gladly clear up how I feel about the
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#311
No, not really, I just posted a list of everyone in the Senate during the vote in question.
MADem
Dec 2013
#321
Kennedy and Wellstone both voted NO. They didnt bow down to King Georgie and kiss his ring.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#328
It would seem there is daylight there on the issue, seems to some in critical areas
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#276
You really think plausible deniablity is going to fly with someone as well known as Hillary Clinton?
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#297
I said not a word about Biden but I don't much think we are debating his positions
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#313
You are veering into distortion, you brought up Biden and are now bringing up Obama
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#326
So what? I still didn't mention them and I am angry because of your distortions and putting words in
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#363
Good posts. It is interesting that people are trying to sell Clinton as "possibly not as bad
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#342
People like to lie about HRC. The Paulbot crowd, especially, gets rabid about her.
MADem
Dec 2013
#351
She accepted $400,000 from Goldman-Sachs and she isnt even running yet. HMMM.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#364
So you've resorted to name calling. I guess by calling those you disagree with "haters" you
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#373
Ah man. It's graft when any of them do it. Speeches by politicians are a common and
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#375
I'm thinking weirdo con job, a lame attempt to coral the left without doing or even saying anything.
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#362
support for military families is a separate issue from supporting a big war budget.
Ken Burch
Dec 2013
#108
Yes, "those women." I wonder if they're any relation to the "You people" I'm often
MADem
Dec 2013
#143
I meant nothing at all like "you people"-it was simply a way to denote a group. No slur at all.
Ken Burch
Dec 2013
#236
I am aware that the conservatives of the Party have control and I suspect that Clinton will win the
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#88
I don't support people who create dramas and fake catfights amongst hardworking Democratic
MADem
Dec 2013
#105
She knows that the big money is on Clinton. Clinton/Christie or Christie/Clinton the banksters
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#365
I dont doubt for a minute that Sen Warren will support the Democratic nominee.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#112
Well, if you think you'll get a better deal from her opponent, go on ahead and withhold that vote.
MADem
Dec 2013
#172
You've laid out what she's "not" going to do before she has even taken the oath.
MADem
Dec 2013
#246
That would be "reining" and we'll have to wait and see who she appoints as Treasury Secretary and
MADem
Dec 2013
#279
So glad you've got the "inside scoop" on what HRC might do. She told you this, I suppose?
MADem
Dec 2013
#305
Do you always "ride to the rescue?" Or are you making a 'personal' exception, here?
MADem
Dec 2013
#334
Since you didn't apparently read it the first time, I think you might. At least go back and re-read
MADem
Dec 2013
#340
I dont see that the lower classes have a chance. Ironically Citizen's United will
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#89
I wonder what Hillary will do under Citizens United that she did not do in 2008,
merrily
Dec 2013
#173
I think the big money would rather see Clinton as the nominee than others.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#195
"But we could simple refuse to vote for people who use Citizens United as a convenient excuse. "
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#206
I agree about campaign money swaying voters, but that was true before Citizens United as well.
merrily
Dec 2013
#215
Not all Democrats are on the side of the lower classes. The Lieberman Wing
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#293
It "hit's" (?) on a desire by some people--for reasons which are not always magnanimous--
MADem
Dec 2013
#65
So, you're levying a personal insult at me, and calling ME --who worked to get Warren elected--
MADem
Dec 2013
#107
Well, gee, part of Brown's "schtick" was his "crossover appeal" to DINOs and Indys.
MADem
Dec 2013
#179
The content of your post doesn't apply to me. How can I "refute" a suggestion, slyly made and
MADem
Dec 2013
#209
Clinton supporters can be smug because they side with the big money. She has
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#91
In 2012 Obama ditched the left to woo the moderate conservatives (Centrists, The Third Way'ers, etc.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#129
Christie is a vengeful bully. He'll have to beat back Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, too.
MADem
Dec 2013
#165
Nasty comment? To say that you side with the big money? Clinton is the BIG MONEY Democratic
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#203
Cinton is the candidate with the most support. Most of her supporters, sorry to break this to you,
MADem
Dec 2013
#231
So, when EW supports Clinton's run for the Presidency, what percentage will she be supporting?
MADem
Dec 2013
#103
She would be supporting the Democratic nominee and, sorry, but I wont throw her under the
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#116
Don't be sorry--that's nice, that you will continue to support her and her choices. nt
MADem
Dec 2013
#120
So she has a gun to her head then? Like she did when she signed the Senate Women's letter?
MADem
Dec 2013
#151
I didnt say that. Those are your words. Do you think Clinton will be tough on
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#153
Oh please! Like READY FOR HILLARY is going to fund her campaign. Just last week she sympathized
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#164
They're a great start--and they don't just represent cash, they represent committed voters.
MADem
Dec 2013
#171
If holding her accountable for her support of Georgie Bush's war means I've lost the
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#199
I think the middle class will get a far better deal with ANY Dem than they will a Republican.
MADem
Dec 2013
#219
There is a tiny nugget of news wrapped in all that politicized verbiage:
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2013
#87
NOAA - Not quite a foot since 1900, but that's a global average, with regional variations
hatrack
Dec 2013
#255
Must make it tough for the apologists on this site to reconcilce their support of the biosphere's
villager
Dec 2013
#6
Looks to me like Clinton has considered her options and chosen to side with the Wall Street
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#95
And another Inter-Democratic Party battle begins between Progressives and Corporatist DINOs.
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2013
#25
Sen Warren would have a tough battle against the big money of the corporate fascists. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#93
no. I tend to laugh at their hackneyed and vitriolic (amateur) writing and analysis
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#288
In October Senator Warren did sign on to a letter encouraging Hillary Clinton
totodeinhere
Dec 2013
#33
The Clintons are Charming People...are you warning us that Warren is just another Clinton
KoKo
Dec 2013
#96
Elizabeth Warren is a wonderful Senator for my state and she has pledged to complete her term.
MADem
Dec 2013
#100
They want to drag her onto a national stage and start playing the "war whoop" game all over again.
MADem
Dec 2013
#157
Gee, maybe the writer of that shitstain of an article cited in the OP should have taken that advice!
MADem
Dec 2013
#198
"We have no idea where she stands on anything aside from banking/Wall Street!!1!"
bullwinkle428
Dec 2013
#35
She also favors a strong military, and is an advocate for military personnel and their families.
MADem
Dec 2013
#109
It would be great (keep dreaming, I know) if we could stick the Koch suckers no outlet for their
Dustlawyer
Dec 2013
#40
The thing that is important right now is the thing that gets her elected.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#51
Why is the target HRC when it says clearly that Obama is paving the way for approval NOW
BrotherIvan
Dec 2013
#78
I undid my rec of this story. I absolutely like Warren and her position on this is excellent.
CreekDog
Dec 2013
#102
Speaking of misquoting, don't even say that I was denying the fight between liberals and centrists
CreekDog
Dec 2013
#125
Indeed, so VERY much baggage, growing monthly w/every corporate "contribution"/bribe
Divernan
Dec 2013
#304
I think it's acceptable to unrec based on the wording of the headline vs. the article
CreekDog
Dec 2013
#234
Uh-oh! Despite the denials, could we be looking at a Warren/Sanders, or Sanders/Warren ticket?
Zorra
Dec 2013
#128
Easy for EW to separate from Hillary the Corporatist DINO who pretends to look out for the little people while pocketin $300k+/speech from corporate fatcats.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2013
#240
Yup, you are spot on. Hillary is a corporate sellout, plain and simple. Surely, we can do better.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2013
#243
Wait a minute, you're using an Obama For President advocacy video to put down HRC?
MADem
Dec 2013
#319
Wow, what a tap dance. The issue here was what did Clinton say? She said she didnt want to raise
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#348
Wow. I go off to finish the War on Christmas and this is what happens when I get back?
Rex
Dec 2013
#357
Anyone that believes an ounce of what Foxnews pedals, well you know what I think Koko.
Rex
Dec 2013
#359