Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren Comes Down Hard Against Global Warming, Separates Herself From Hillary Clinton [View all]KoKo
(84,711 posts)360. Sorry...that was a rude snark at you on my part.
Last edited Mon Dec 30, 2013, 11:05 AM - Edit history (2)
My apologies.
----------
Well...there's a HillPac waiting for you donation according to some DU'ers ..so
Go For It. At least you aren't "into Faux News."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
426 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Elizabeth Warren Comes Down Hard Against Global Warming, Separates Herself From Hillary Clinton [View all]
KoKo
Dec 2013
OP
You say "stirring the pot" as if that was a bad thing. It's way past time to stir the pot.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#9
Changing the subject because one can't address the rank unfairness that is the thesis of this
MADem
Dec 2013
#141
You can do what you want--vote as you please. Pull the lever for Christie or Rand Paul, for all I
MADem
Dec 2013
#187
"Do what you want" is pretty plain. Don't behave like an aggrieved and put upon voter
MADem
Dec 2013
#254
I'm here to advocate for the policies of the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party.
WowSeriously
Dec 2013
#270
You've been here for just over a month, and your tone, attitude and demeanor are
MADem
Dec 2013
#284
I have never had any "email exchanges" with you--so I'm not sure what you're on about.
MADem
Dec 2013
#317
Like the Obama partisans didn't throw HIM under the bus, either, when he didn't satisfy their every
MADem
Dec 2013
#54
Oh, gee, if I keep tryin' real hard, maybe I'll figure it out. It's just so hard an' all, I need
MADem
Dec 2013
#66
The candidates who -- with the exception of Al Gore, who wuz robbed-- get the most votes
MADem
Dec 2013
#156
FDR had no problem violating the Constitutional rights of US citizens based on their race.
MADem
Dec 2013
#278
The article isn't about Hillary. It's really about Warren versus the establishment.
NYC_SKP
Dec 2013
#282
Hillary is arguably the single most representative person in the Democratic establishment.
NYC_SKP
Dec 2013
#301
No doubt there. Sadly, Hillary and Obama have more in common with each other than they do...
NYC_SKP
Dec 2013
#345
Are you really going to argue that environmental stewardship is some radical far left position that
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#34
What "facts?" That HRC isn't in public life now, that she was subordinate to the POTUS and
MADem
Dec 2013
#86
Only someone who doesn't "get" how it works would think that a SECSTATE isn't subordinate to their
MADem
Dec 2013
#99
If you don't understand that the job of cabinet officials is to execute the POTUS's policy, I can't
MADem
Dec 2013
#194
You deserve a freaking medal. Good Lord, just READING this hysterical exchange has made me tired
Number23
Dec 2013
#238
Interesting that they are trying to sell Clinton as "eight more years of the status quo". nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#259
Yes and no - in diplomacy with other countries, he has to make offers acceptable (and pre approved)
karynnj
Dec 2013
#275
And I assume you would support her no matter who she selected for her cabinet.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#260
I do think she'll make good choices, but I'd not be afraid to criticize a bad pick.
MADem
Dec 2013
#268
I think she's a moderate--like Elizabeth Warren is--on most issues, and liberal on others.
MADem
Dec 2013
#286
I will be glad to "whack" anyone that supports the Patriot Act. Why do I single her out?
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#292
They are not running for president, but Goldman-Sachs-Clinton is running for president.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#296
Well, you said you'd be glad to whack them, and now you change your mind and single out just one.
MADem
Dec 2013
#308
You keep changing the focus. But I will gladly clear up how I feel about the
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#311
No, not really, I just posted a list of everyone in the Senate during the vote in question.
MADem
Dec 2013
#321
Kennedy and Wellstone both voted NO. They didnt bow down to King Georgie and kiss his ring.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#328
It would seem there is daylight there on the issue, seems to some in critical areas
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#276
You really think plausible deniablity is going to fly with someone as well known as Hillary Clinton?
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#297
I said not a word about Biden but I don't much think we are debating his positions
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#313
You are veering into distortion, you brought up Biden and are now bringing up Obama
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#326
So what? I still didn't mention them and I am angry because of your distortions and putting words in
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#363
Good posts. It is interesting that people are trying to sell Clinton as "possibly not as bad
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#342
People like to lie about HRC. The Paulbot crowd, especially, gets rabid about her.
MADem
Dec 2013
#351
She accepted $400,000 from Goldman-Sachs and she isnt even running yet. HMMM.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#364
So you've resorted to name calling. I guess by calling those you disagree with "haters" you
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#373
Ah man. It's graft when any of them do it. Speeches by politicians are a common and
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#375
I'm thinking weirdo con job, a lame attempt to coral the left without doing or even saying anything.
TheKentuckian
Dec 2013
#362
support for military families is a separate issue from supporting a big war budget.
Ken Burch
Dec 2013
#108
Yes, "those women." I wonder if they're any relation to the "You people" I'm often
MADem
Dec 2013
#143
I meant nothing at all like "you people"-it was simply a way to denote a group. No slur at all.
Ken Burch
Dec 2013
#236
I am aware that the conservatives of the Party have control and I suspect that Clinton will win the
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#88
I don't support people who create dramas and fake catfights amongst hardworking Democratic
MADem
Dec 2013
#105
She knows that the big money is on Clinton. Clinton/Christie or Christie/Clinton the banksters
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#365
I dont doubt for a minute that Sen Warren will support the Democratic nominee.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#112
Well, if you think you'll get a better deal from her opponent, go on ahead and withhold that vote.
MADem
Dec 2013
#172
You've laid out what she's "not" going to do before she has even taken the oath.
MADem
Dec 2013
#246
That would be "reining" and we'll have to wait and see who she appoints as Treasury Secretary and
MADem
Dec 2013
#279
So glad you've got the "inside scoop" on what HRC might do. She told you this, I suppose?
MADem
Dec 2013
#305
Do you always "ride to the rescue?" Or are you making a 'personal' exception, here?
MADem
Dec 2013
#334
Since you didn't apparently read it the first time, I think you might. At least go back and re-read
MADem
Dec 2013
#340
I dont see that the lower classes have a chance. Ironically Citizen's United will
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#89
I wonder what Hillary will do under Citizens United that she did not do in 2008,
merrily
Dec 2013
#173
I think the big money would rather see Clinton as the nominee than others.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#195
"But we could simple refuse to vote for people who use Citizens United as a convenient excuse. "
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#206
I agree about campaign money swaying voters, but that was true before Citizens United as well.
merrily
Dec 2013
#215
Not all Democrats are on the side of the lower classes. The Lieberman Wing
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#293
It "hit's" (?) on a desire by some people--for reasons which are not always magnanimous--
MADem
Dec 2013
#65
So, you're levying a personal insult at me, and calling ME --who worked to get Warren elected--
MADem
Dec 2013
#107
Well, gee, part of Brown's "schtick" was his "crossover appeal" to DINOs and Indys.
MADem
Dec 2013
#179
The content of your post doesn't apply to me. How can I "refute" a suggestion, slyly made and
MADem
Dec 2013
#209
Clinton supporters can be smug because they side with the big money. She has
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#91
In 2012 Obama ditched the left to woo the moderate conservatives (Centrists, The Third Way'ers, etc.
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#129
Christie is a vengeful bully. He'll have to beat back Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, too.
MADem
Dec 2013
#165
Nasty comment? To say that you side with the big money? Clinton is the BIG MONEY Democratic
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#203
Cinton is the candidate with the most support. Most of her supporters, sorry to break this to you,
MADem
Dec 2013
#231
So, when EW supports Clinton's run for the Presidency, what percentage will she be supporting?
MADem
Dec 2013
#103
She would be supporting the Democratic nominee and, sorry, but I wont throw her under the
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#116
Don't be sorry--that's nice, that you will continue to support her and her choices. nt
MADem
Dec 2013
#120
So she has a gun to her head then? Like she did when she signed the Senate Women's letter?
MADem
Dec 2013
#151
I didnt say that. Those are your words. Do you think Clinton will be tough on
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#153
Oh please! Like READY FOR HILLARY is going to fund her campaign. Just last week she sympathized
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#164
They're a great start--and they don't just represent cash, they represent committed voters.
MADem
Dec 2013
#171
If holding her accountable for her support of Georgie Bush's war means I've lost the
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#199
I think the middle class will get a far better deal with ANY Dem than they will a Republican.
MADem
Dec 2013
#219
There is a tiny nugget of news wrapped in all that politicized verbiage:
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2013
#87
NOAA - Not quite a foot since 1900, but that's a global average, with regional variations
hatrack
Dec 2013
#255
Must make it tough for the apologists on this site to reconcilce their support of the biosphere's
villager
Dec 2013
#6
Looks to me like Clinton has considered her options and chosen to side with the Wall Street
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#95
And another Inter-Democratic Party battle begins between Progressives and Corporatist DINOs.
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2013
#25
Sen Warren would have a tough battle against the big money of the corporate fascists. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#93
no. I tend to laugh at their hackneyed and vitriolic (amateur) writing and analysis
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#288
In October Senator Warren did sign on to a letter encouraging Hillary Clinton
totodeinhere
Dec 2013
#33
The Clintons are Charming People...are you warning us that Warren is just another Clinton
KoKo
Dec 2013
#96
Elizabeth Warren is a wonderful Senator for my state and she has pledged to complete her term.
MADem
Dec 2013
#100
They want to drag her onto a national stage and start playing the "war whoop" game all over again.
MADem
Dec 2013
#157
Gee, maybe the writer of that shitstain of an article cited in the OP should have taken that advice!
MADem
Dec 2013
#198
"We have no idea where she stands on anything aside from banking/Wall Street!!1!"
bullwinkle428
Dec 2013
#35
She also favors a strong military, and is an advocate for military personnel and their families.
MADem
Dec 2013
#109
It would be great (keep dreaming, I know) if we could stick the Koch suckers no outlet for their
Dustlawyer
Dec 2013
#40
The thing that is important right now is the thing that gets her elected.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#51
Why is the target HRC when it says clearly that Obama is paving the way for approval NOW
BrotherIvan
Dec 2013
#78
I undid my rec of this story. I absolutely like Warren and her position on this is excellent.
CreekDog
Dec 2013
#102
Speaking of misquoting, don't even say that I was denying the fight between liberals and centrists
CreekDog
Dec 2013
#125
Indeed, so VERY much baggage, growing monthly w/every corporate "contribution"/bribe
Divernan
Dec 2013
#304
I think it's acceptable to unrec based on the wording of the headline vs. the article
CreekDog
Dec 2013
#234
Uh-oh! Despite the denials, could we be looking at a Warren/Sanders, or Sanders/Warren ticket?
Zorra
Dec 2013
#128
Easy for EW to separate from Hillary the Corporatist DINO who pretends to look out for the little people while pocketin $300k+/speech from corporate fatcats.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2013
#240
Yup, you are spot on. Hillary is a corporate sellout, plain and simple. Surely, we can do better.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2013
#243
Wait a minute, you're using an Obama For President advocacy video to put down HRC?
MADem
Dec 2013
#319
Wow, what a tap dance. The issue here was what did Clinton say? She said she didnt want to raise
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#348
Wow. I go off to finish the War on Christmas and this is what happens when I get back?
Rex
Dec 2013
#357
Anyone that believes an ounce of what Foxnews pedals, well you know what I think Koko.
Rex
Dec 2013
#359