Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
63. Is that you Deepak Chopra?
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 01:10 PM
Jan 2014

I only ask because the cavalier way the word "Quantum" was thrown in in a manner that clearly communicates you have no understanding of it but think it works as some kind of magic wand to explain crazy nonsense in a scientific sounding way.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Are you a scientist in real life pnwmom Jan 2014 #1
Are you a politician in real life?... Locut0s Jan 2014 #2
A lot of people here have been claiming a scientific expertise pnwmom Jan 2014 #3
Science isn't some impenetrable Gray edifice... Locut0s Jan 2014 #5
I agree. And I know enough scientists personally pnwmom Jan 2014 #6
So you are saying that debunking pseudoscience is speaking for scientists?... Locut0s Jan 2014 #7
You may find this interesting Shankapotomus Jan 2014 #21
the link doesn't work but the concept makes a great deal of sense to me. Voice for Peace Jan 2014 #58
link fixed Shankapotomus Jan 2014 #87
"There is no such thing as political expertise" Lizzie Poppet Jan 2014 #43
Scientific literacy is different than being formally trained as a physicist. Gore1FL Jan 2014 #52
Is scientist a job or a method? The Straight Story Jan 2014 #4
Where in the OP does the poster claim to be a scientist? intaglio Jan 2014 #22
I think there should be equal opportunity skepticism. pnwmom Jan 2014 #25
Question Big Pharma, yes. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #29
No they see credulous persons like yourself intaglio Jan 2014 #36
In any large group of individuals, some will always be closer to various fringes. eShirl Jan 2014 #8
This is true... Locut0s Jan 2014 #10
not necessarily observer bias eShirl Jan 2014 #14
Ok agreed... Locut0s Jan 2014 #16
or unquestioning obedience to your doctor, rather than prayer Voice for Peace Jan 2014 #60
Some Woo That You May Choose To Reconsider cantbeserious Jan 2014 #9
Well, Quantum Enigma is not woo intaglio Jan 2014 #35
Both Topics Interlaced And Related At The Quantum Level cantbeserious Jan 2014 #38
Whargarble eom intaglio Jan 2014 #40
Non Responsive Post cantbeserious Jan 2014 #44
So was yours intaglio Jan 2014 #45
English Written Clearly - One Might Try It Sometime cantbeserious Jan 2014 #46
you haven't read any of my previous posts intaglio Jan 2014 #47
Have Read Them All - All Judged Non Responsive By Woo Fighter - Fight On cantbeserious Jan 2014 #49
Non-responsive Whargarble intaglio Jan 2014 #50
Non Responsive Post cantbeserious Jan 2014 #82
So you cannot be bothered to write more than one phrase or sentence intaglio Jan 2014 #84
Is that you Deepak Chopra? gcomeau Jan 2014 #63
Ad Hominem Attacks - The Worst Of The Logical Fallacies cantbeserious Jan 2014 #67
Please go learn what an "ad hominem attack" is. gcomeau Jan 2014 #68
Once Again - An Ad Hominem Attack - Vacuous Accusations cantbeserious Jan 2014 #72
Wow, you really do like to use terms you don't understand don't you? gcomeau Jan 2014 #73
Wow - Deflection Of The Highest Order - Well Played cantbeserious Jan 2014 #74
Pointing out what is happening is "deflection" now? gcomeau Jan 2014 #75
Yup. Woo Woo credo #10 SidDithers Jan 2014 #76
Your comment that: "In all cases highlighted by Dr Tucker the children were either schooled...... LongTomH Jan 2014 #79
Check James Randi's site for detail. intaglio Jan 2014 #85
I won't ignore it, despite your ad hominem LongTomH Jan 2014 #89
Quantum physics works the same whether the observer is a human or a computer FarCenter Jan 2014 #81
Tell That To The Authors, Not The Poster cantbeserious Jan 2014 #83
You are the one proposing that these books be taken seriously intaglio Jan 2014 #86
Just an idea truebluegreen Jan 2014 #11
Anti-science Beliefs Jeopardize US Democracy etherealtruth Jan 2014 #12
I think you are right. I was too quick to jump the gun... Locut0s Jan 2014 #13
Look at the polling regarding belief in evolution etherealtruth Jan 2014 #15
"Republican science denialism tends to be motivated by antiregulatory fervor and fundamentalist pampango Jan 2014 #17
It rings rather true etherealtruth Jan 2014 #18
Industry, abetted by its paid scientists, has a long history of hiding pnwmom Jan 2014 #26
and Locrian Jan 2014 #33
I get your concern... Locrian Jan 2014 #19
This is true... Locut0s Jan 2014 #20
exactly - thanks for getting it Locrian Jan 2014 #24
Your points a,b,and c are very valid and extremely important etherealtruth Jan 2014 #30
Woo is just..... BrainDrain Jan 2014 #23
Then acupuncture is not "woo," despite the repeated claims here. pnwmom Jan 2014 #27
The "woo" in acupuncture is the attempts to explain how it works. jeff47 Jan 2014 #54
The western doctors who use it acknowledge they don't know how or why it works. pnwmom Jan 2014 #71
Again, the woo is the attempts to explain how it works. jeff47 Jan 2014 #77
The biggest UFO nuts I've met klook Jan 2014 #28
It's not just a "left" thing ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jan 2014 #31
Politics... the greatest woo of them all. LanternWaste Jan 2014 #32
Ha! I think you may be right. ZombieHorde Jan 2014 #53
You are not a doctor. NOBODY asked you for medical advice. Romulox Jan 2014 #34
I agree. I think one of the big problems is that... stevenleser Jan 2014 #37
There is nothing wrong with disagreeing. What is wrong is the obsession some have with liberal_at_heart Jan 2014 #39
I rec this post. Voice for Peace Jan 2014 #61
I would agree if I didn't think they were helping to perpetuate frauds... Humanist_Activist Jan 2014 #70
I'm surprised that you can make the leap to "anti-scientific" for people who embrace alternative Sheldon Cooper Jan 2014 #41
Fair enough LeftishBrit Jan 2014 #57
yes. thankyou. Voice for Peace Jan 2014 #62
Why shocked at woo on the left? thesquanderer Jan 2014 #42
Einstein (a pretty cool scientist): "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious... polichick Jan 2014 #48
For cripes sake... gcomeau Jan 2014 #64
For cripes sake, nobody said it was. Think harder. polichick Jan 2014 #80
The left is more idealistic and chafes at the constraints of reality FarCenter Jan 2014 #51
Woo is literally killing people. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #55
I don't think it's a predominantly left-wing attitude at all LeftishBrit Jan 2014 #56
My opinion.. the right has way more woo, just a different sort. Voice for Peace Jan 2014 #59
Not just more ... but, widely accepted! etherealtruth Jan 2014 #65
Woo isn't specific to a party. Just ignore the nutters. Xithras Jan 2014 #66
Good post. nt laundry_queen Jan 2014 #90
I don't think liberals are any more prone to woo. lumberjack_jeff Jan 2014 #69
Oh good grief, stop with the woo!!! Will hide any post I see with that word. madfloridian Jan 2014 #78
Let me offer you a slightly different view of this nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #88
And the other physics theory that is so interesting pnwmom Jan 2014 #91
I have re-read that one a few times nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #92
Yes! I was just writing something about that yesterday. pnwmom Jan 2014 #93
I have no doubt that god does not exist nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #94
"The more you learn, the more you know you don't know." pnwmom Jan 2014 #95
When I turn off my computer where does the information stored in RAM go? FarCenter Jan 2014 #96
Not at the quantum level nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #98
I think questioning if money is influencing science is fair game but beliefs that fly in the face Quixote1818 Jan 2014 #97
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As a scientifically minde...»Reply #63