Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: After 43 Years, Activists Admit Theft At FBI Office That Exposed Domestic Spying - NBCNews [View all]Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)45. Kick nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
After 43 Years, Activists Admit Theft At FBI Office That Exposed Domestic Spying - NBCNews [View all]
WillyT
Jan 2014
OP
Sen. Wyden was warning about problems with the surveillance of some sort before Snowden
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#26
Congress IS capable of conducting hearings in closed session, and if you don't think that staffers
MADem
Jan 2014
#33
I get the impression Rand Paul is only making a big deal out of this....
Hassin Bin Sober
Jan 2014
#55
What happened to the leaker of Valerie Plame's identity and undercover work? So Congress held
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#74
Code Pink made a mockery of those hearings, which resulted in very little coverage.
MADem
Jan 2014
#75
Can't answer the question? I can, NOTHING happened to the leaker. Thanks Congress.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#78
What do you mean, "can't answer the question?" Your memory is faulty. The leaker was convicted.
MADem
Jan 2014
#79
Libby was convicted of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. You know what that means don't you? He
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#80
I and most Democrats are more than familiar with all that happened during what at one time, looked
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#83
So what's your solution? "Slash and burn?" "Throw 'em all out" because they didn't
MADem
Jan 2014
#86
My solution was to elect Dems in 2008. Remember? What is yours, to give up and accept it? All the
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#87
Mmm, Ellsberg suffered the same attacks when he decided that the welfare of the country and the
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#73
Ellsberg didn't run away, and he didn't write letters to foreign governments offering his services.
MADem
Jan 2014
#76
Actually, he did go into hiding. But, quite a few people at the RAND corp knew were certain who
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#82
No. I won't give it up. And so happy that these people who allegedly were you, praised Snowden
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#19
Your itch, in less than eight paragraphs, is infected. Get some ointment on it. nt
MADem
Jan 2014
#34
Indeed. I have. You are my ointment. And a very satisfying ointment you are.
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#36
Clearly. You haven't a clue. Looking forward to your 8 paragraph rebuttal
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#11
Really. You cover yourself with the mantle of those who exposed FBI un-Constitutional surveillance..
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#24
If they are so honorable, why didn't they expose themselves from the get go?
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#29
I think the poster is pointing out that some others here would call them cowards
Fumesucker
Jan 2014
#51
I would be more impressed with their courage if they had nof waited 43 years to come forward.
Jenoch
Jan 2014
#31
Hahahaha!!!! Their courage was the original theft. They've come forward to support Snowden.
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#32
I guess it proves the FBI was no more competent 43 years ago than they are now
Savannahmann
Jan 2014
#46
I wonder about the posters here, who have a problem with the people exposing unlawful and
RC
Jan 2014
#59
Posted this earlier, but wanted to add here that this story is currently on (free) Hulu
Le Taz Hot
Jan 2014
#77