Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(66,661 posts)

11. They've had this policy ever since that incident with the topless ape in 1933.

Tue Jan 14, 2014, 11:19 AM

Jan 2014

Rumor has it he wasn't even wearing pants.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

25 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Empire State Building sues over topless photos [View all] The Straight Story Jan 2014 OP

The observation deck is a tourist trap liberal N proud Jan 2014 #1

I've been to both ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jan 2014 #23

Top of the Rock = way better view, less crowds. n/t LeftinOH Jan 2014 #6

Are pictures allowed at The Parthenon? cherokeeprogressive Jan 2014 #21

The children. Think of the children. (nt) Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #22

LOL nnnnnope. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2014 #25

The Empire State Building is going to lose in my expectation. Chan790 Jan 2014 #4

Your admission ticket likely excludes commercial activity. badtoworse Jan 2014 #15

n/t RedRocco Jan 2014 #5

link Coyotl Jan 2014 #13

Toplessness is entirely legal in NYC. So is taking photos. (nt) Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #7

But on private property you generally need a permit justiceischeap Jan 2014 #8

To take photos? Or to be topless? Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #9

To take photos. justiceischeap Jan 2014 #10

LOL! badtoworse Jan 2014 #16

If photos of a shirtless man on the observation deck can be found Motown_Johnny Jan 2014 #12

City pays woman $40K to keep going topless Coyotl Jan 2014 #17

Some of his pics: edbermac Jan 2014 #24