General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: William Rivers Pitt | An Open Letter to Lovers of the Gun [View all]billh58
(6,655 posts)right-wing (ALEC, the Koch Bros, the NRA, the Republican Party) has framed this battle the same way they framed the abortion fight. The terms "anti-gun," and "pro-gun" are meaningless but very effective in stirring up emotions on both sides of the argument. This reduces the issue to a very Republican "you're either with us, or you're against us" frame of argument and prevents compromise. The result is, at this point, a perception that "anti-gun" means the repeal of the Second Amendment, and "pro-gun" means total alignment with the NRA and a "cold-dead-hands" stance.
The correct framework for solving the gun violence epidemic in this nation should address the gun holder, AND the gun. The discussions should include qualifications for possession of a gun to include (among other factors) universal background checks for mental fitness, and any history of criminal or anti-social behavior. The type of weapons suitable for civilian use should be determined and agreed upon by reasonable persons from both sides of the argument, with a particular focus on handguns -- especially the concealed carry of handguns in the public venue.
The illegal possession and carry of guns under any circumstances should result in automatic jail time, and harsher penalties when guns are used in the commission of a crime (extended minimum sentences).
It's not the gun, it's the idiot with the gun. After we have begun to solve the gun violence problem in the USA, we can then work on knives, forks, axes, swords, swimming pools, etc. Automobile deaths are already being addressed and are falling, and gun deaths are forecast to exceed automobile deaths in just a couple of years.