Fuck.

[cui bono]

585. As I said, I was responding to the one thing in her post.

I didn't take on the entire subject matter. Sometimes I (and other people) respond to everything said, sometimes just to one of two things. Sorry, but I wasn't in the frame of mind to jump into the whole debate, but did feel like pointing out the "shame on you".

After that she attacked me and said I was discriminating in who I would give my "empathy" to, which was a completely personal and baseless attack, because I didn't offer condolences.

Then she fabricated the entire content of some imaginary post of mine that bore no resemblance to what I had actually said, trying to further demonize me. I was responding to that at that point. My issue with her was the "shame on you" and the fact that she tried to claim I deemed her not worthy of "empathy" because she's an Obama apologist, and then the fact that she completely made up things that I had said or not said. She made it personal attack on me at that point - a slanderous one - and that's what I was addressing. And she did so by using her brother's suicide to score points, when that wasn't part of our discussion. That's pretty bad in my eyes. Especially when you couple it with complete fabrication of what the other person said. There was no genuine attempt at honest communication, but a real attempt to smear me using falsehoods.

With that, I'm done. It really has been gone over a couple times now at least.