Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Seattle's Socialist City Councilor Offers Radical Response to Obama Speech" [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)63. That
Obama is the president whose broken website is a symbol of the broken hopes of millions who believed his promises for affordable healthcare.
<...>
I ran on a platform of $15 minimum wage, taxing the super-rich to pay for mass transit and education, and for affordable housing, including rent control.
<...>
I ran on a platform of $15 minimum wage, taxing the super-rich to pay for mass transit and education, and for affordable housing, including rent control.
..."broken website" is going to help tens of millions more people than her rant, which helps no one.
Medicaid for the Homeless
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024090692
From 'I don't want any part of Obamacare' to 'It's a godsend'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024349685
Obamacare Will Help Reduce Income Inequality
by TomP
Obamacare is far from perfect. Many of us have long sought a single payer system, but that was not doable in 2010. Perhaps a public option was, and it is unfortunate that we did not achieve that. It is one of the reforms to Obamacare that progressives should fight for.
My post today is about some good news. A study from the Brookings Institution shows that Obamacare will help reduce income inequality. Of course, much more is needed, but it all adds up. This is a step forward. (Raising the minimum wage also is very important because it will cause a bump in wages at minimum wage and wages above it (and it likely will have to be done state-by-state).)
Here's the study on Obamacare and inequality:
Brookings Institution: POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT ON INCOME INEQUALITY
You can read the entire study at that link. Here is a synopsis from TPM:
Obamacare is worth defending.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/01/27/1272820/-Obamacare-Will-Help-Reduce-Income-Inequality
by TomP
Obamacare is far from perfect. Many of us have long sought a single payer system, but that was not doable in 2010. Perhaps a public option was, and it is unfortunate that we did not achieve that. It is one of the reforms to Obamacare that progressives should fight for.
My post today is about some good news. A study from the Brookings Institution shows that Obamacare will help reduce income inequality. Of course, much more is needed, but it all adds up. This is a step forward. (Raising the minimum wage also is very important because it will cause a bump in wages at minimum wage and wages above it (and it likely will have to be done state-by-state).)
Here's the study on Obamacare and inequality:
THE ARCHITECTS OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT (ACA) sought to expand health insurance coverage, slow the growth of health care spending, and improve the quality of care. Changing the distribution of incomes was not a stated objective. Nonetheless, the ACA may do more to change the income distribution than any other recently enacted law. It does so by requiring employers to offer affordable health insurance to their full-time employees, by providing refundable tax credits to help make private health insurance affordable, and by expanding eligibility for Medicaid. The law penalizes nonpoor adults who are offered affordable coverage and do not buy it. It reduces subsidies for some Medicare plans and imposes new taxes on the labor and investment incomes of high-income families. In each of these ways, the new health law will change the net incomes of Americans at all income levels.
Brookings Institution: POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT ON INCOME INEQUALITY
You can read the entire study at that link. Here is a synopsis from TPM:
Obamacare is poised to mitigate soaring inequality by raising the incomes of the poorest Americans, according to a new study by the Brookings Institution.
By 2016, when its core provisions will have fully taken effect, the law will lift the average incomes of the bottom one-fifth of earners by nearly 6 percent, and the incomes of the bottom one-tenth by more than 7 percent, the study found.
The "great majority" of beneficiaries of the law's subsidies and Medicaid expansion will be in the bottom half -- and the "overwhelmingly majority" in the bottom third -- of the income distribution.
Obamacare is worth defending.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/01/27/1272820/-Obamacare-Will-Help-Reduce-Income-Inequality
Krugman: Obama and the One Percent
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024391415
The new heatlh care law raised the payroll tax for high income earners and taxed investment income.
Net Investment Income Tax
A new Net Investment Income Tax goes into effect starting in 2013. The 3.8 percent Net Investment Income Tax applies to individuals, estates and trusts that have certain investment income above certain threshold amounts. The IRS and the Treasury Department have issued proposed regulations on the Net Investment Income Tax. Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail or hand delivered to the IRS. For additional information on the Net Investment Income Tax, see our questions and answers.
Additional Medicare Tax
A new Additional Medicare Tax goes into effect starting in 2013. The 0.9 percent Additional Medicare Tax applies to an individuals wages, Railroad Retirement Tax Act compensation, and self-employment income that exceeds a threshold amount based on the individuals filing status. The threshold amounts are $250,000 for married taxpayers who file jointly, $125,000 for married taxpayers who file separately, and $200,000 for all other taxpayers. An employer is responsible for withholding the Additional Medicare Tax from wages or compensation it pays to an employee in excess of $200,000 in a calendar year. The IRS and the Department of the Treasury have issued proposed regulations on the Additional Medicare Tax. Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail or hand delivered to the IRS. For additional information on the Additional Medicare Tax, see our questions and answers.
http://www.irs.gov/uac/Affordable-Care-Act-Tax-Provisions
A new Net Investment Income Tax goes into effect starting in 2013. The 3.8 percent Net Investment Income Tax applies to individuals, estates and trusts that have certain investment income above certain threshold amounts. The IRS and the Treasury Department have issued proposed regulations on the Net Investment Income Tax. Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail or hand delivered to the IRS. For additional information on the Net Investment Income Tax, see our questions and answers.
Additional Medicare Tax
A new Additional Medicare Tax goes into effect starting in 2013. The 0.9 percent Additional Medicare Tax applies to an individuals wages, Railroad Retirement Tax Act compensation, and self-employment income that exceeds a threshold amount based on the individuals filing status. The threshold amounts are $250,000 for married taxpayers who file jointly, $125,000 for married taxpayers who file separately, and $200,000 for all other taxpayers. An employer is responsible for withholding the Additional Medicare Tax from wages or compensation it pays to an employee in excess of $200,000 in a calendar year. The IRS and the Department of the Treasury have issued proposed regulations on the Additional Medicare Tax. Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail or hand delivered to the IRS. For additional information on the Additional Medicare Tax, see our questions and answers.
http://www.irs.gov/uac/Affordable-Care-Act-Tax-Provisions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
303 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Seattle's Socialist City Councilor Offers Radical Response to Obama Speech" [View all]
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
OP
'Even on DU'. You know what? Maybe this is what was needed. While we all thought we had
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#71
I shouldn't have to do this, please read the mission statement from the about section.
A Simple Game
Feb 2014
#282
Exelellent post. Then the left will probably have to get organized. Sometimes it takes a while
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#107
Hillary Clinton called herself Progressive before you called yourself that....
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#271
So the Democrats are now completely Socialist...not Socialist Democrats...but just full on
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#77
Never.but I also do not see the Democrat'ic' (because the purity trolls found my typo disconcerting)
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#181
and I replied....trying to "discover" something based on 2 letters is a bit of
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#267
Yeah well you said that ...you know in public where I could see it....not in a private message..
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#278
I have yet to see you express anything liberal. You're a supporter of the President's.
cali
Feb 2014
#258
Yes, well you've been pretty clear about not believing that the 'democrat' party
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#234
Calling for a workers' takeover of Boeing factories is center-right reformism?
DireStrike
Feb 2014
#170
As I recall, she didn't really have that as a part of her electoral platform.......
socialist_n_TN
Feb 2014
#176
We in Workers Power use centrist all the time to describe groups.......
socialist_n_TN
Feb 2014
#194
And why does a new quasi-revolutionary socialist movement need any of the taint of old-school
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#250
Okay, I get that you're not advocating Soviet-style Communism (or faux-Communism, more like).
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#280
FDR was trying to save capitalism by his socialistic reforms, but........
socialist_n_TN
Feb 2014
#197
And I explained in another post in this thread what Lenin and Trotsky meant......
socialist_n_TN
Feb 2014
#222
I accept my Social Security AND Medicare....therefore I...like every other American that does
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#255
Exactly. As I said before, our current hyper-capitalism is just as much as failure as Soviet
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#281
Yesterday on CNN I heard the Prez say once again how he wants to work with the repubs.
CrispyQ
Feb 2014
#93
That's the point, isn't it? They don't want a party that's more Conservative.
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#106
About Half of that 60% Want Whatever the Tee Vee or the Preacherman Tells them to Want
AndyTiedye
Feb 2014
#200
I had been wondering if I should look into the Green Party, but she definitely makes me want to
liberal_at_heart
Jan 2014
#3
Right, because FR wants $15/hr minimum wage, lol. NOTHING like FR. In fact,
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
#27
Actually, I think one WOULD need the level of brain damage FR causes to think that
Scootaloo
Jan 2014
#33
It's alright, Freepers can't tell the difference between socialism and fascism either.
NuclearDem
Jan 2014
#41
Please explain the similarities, or admit that your post is the unsubstantiated bullshit.
last1standing
Jan 2014
#60
Sure because Freepers want "$15 minimum wage, taxing the super-rich to pay for mass transit
cui bono
Feb 2014
#84
Don't expect a response. The cheer squad only reads WH press releases, and they never, ever
Marr
Feb 2014
#101
i agree with you. What President has ever done everything you wanted him to do? With the kind of
kelliekat44
Jan 2014
#20
And as one of the great orators of our day, President Obama would have succeeded.
gLibDem
Feb 2014
#154
It certainly put to rest the question of which constituency Obama represents -
Maedhros
Feb 2014
#273
Obama had a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate for only 24 working days.
SunSeeker
Feb 2014
#158
Dems never employed the filibuster in the unprecedented way the GOP did starting in 2009. nt
SunSeeker
Feb 2014
#183
During the first 6 months was when we had that 24 days of the filibuster proof majority.
SunSeeker
Feb 2014
#211
The Senate's formal rules can only be changed at the start of a two-year Congress.
SunSeeker
Feb 2014
#241
I think the new minimum wage increase push is a good, FDR-style strategy, don't you? nt
SunSeeker
Feb 2014
#242
May I remind you, all he had to do to end the bush tax cuts was nothing, also, he refused to look at
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
#32
Ending the Tax Cuts Would Have Crashed the Economy. Medicare for All Was DOA in the Senate
AndyTiedye
Feb 2014
#193
There is not many people left around here that are not buying into the conventional wisdom.
RC
Feb 2014
#264
The Could Not Have Used that Money for Anything With the GOP in Control of the House
AndyTiedye
Feb 2014
#293
Absolutely agree. After this rant, I have zero respect for the woman. I still support some of her
okaawhatever
Jan 2014
#34
Yeah who can take anyone seriously when they run on "a platform of $15 minimum wage,
cui bono
Feb 2014
#85
But unregulated capitalism is what you get when you allow capitalism........
socialist_n_TN
Feb 2014
#289
Although there are a lot of "Thanks Oba_ma" falsities in her rant, she should try to run nationally
Amonester
Feb 2014
#74
The only problem with voting for someone other than a "democrat" in a major election is something
Victor_c3
Feb 2014
#87
Yep. Even though capitalism isn't mentioned in the constitution, it controls our government.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2014
#153
It's wonderful she can share insights she's gleaned from her long career in government,
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#156
If she wants to organize the working class, let her organize the working class
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#245
The Socialist Party's platform for education rocks. I just went out and checked it out
liberal_at_heart
Feb 2014
#236