Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Seattle's Socialist City Councilor Offers Radical Response to Obama Speech" [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)184. Vermont's exchange is 100 percent federally funded. Here
"Nice talking to ya, I've an errand to run but I'll be back for more of you juicy blue links. "
...for when you get back:
Lessons from Vermont's Health Care Reform
By Laura K. Grubb, M.D.
The New England Journal of Medicine, April 4, 2013
In May 2011, Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin signed legislation to implement Green Mountain Care (GMC), a single-payer, publicly financed, universal health care system. Vermont's reform law passed 15 months after the historic federal Affordable Care Act (ACA) became law. In passing reforms, Vermont took matters into its own hands and is well ahead of most other states in its efforts to implement federal and state health care reforms by 2014. The Supreme Court decision last June to uphold most of the ACA left many states scrambling, since they had postponed reforms pending the judgment. Although Vermont is a small state, its reform efforts provide valuable lessons for other states in implementing ACA reforms.
<...>
Finally, Vermont policymakers are maximizing federal financing and have projected cost savings. In January 2013, the state released a 156-page financing plan for its single-payer arrangement; the plan outlines federal financing sources and the anticipated generation of savings. Vermont has been awarded more than $250 million in federal funding for its state exchange the fifth-highest amount among the states, although Vermont has the country's second-smallest state population. We feel strongly that the exchange is not the answer to all of Vermont's health care problems, Shumlin remarked, explaining that the exchange is helpful to Vermont to bring us federal dollars to achieve our single-payer goal.3 In fact, state exchange development will be 100% federally funded.4
- more -
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2013/april/lessons-from-vermonts-health-care-reform
By Laura K. Grubb, M.D.
The New England Journal of Medicine, April 4, 2013
In May 2011, Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin signed legislation to implement Green Mountain Care (GMC), a single-payer, publicly financed, universal health care system. Vermont's reform law passed 15 months after the historic federal Affordable Care Act (ACA) became law. In passing reforms, Vermont took matters into its own hands and is well ahead of most other states in its efforts to implement federal and state health care reforms by 2014. The Supreme Court decision last June to uphold most of the ACA left many states scrambling, since they had postponed reforms pending the judgment. Although Vermont is a small state, its reform efforts provide valuable lessons for other states in implementing ACA reforms.
<...>
Finally, Vermont policymakers are maximizing federal financing and have projected cost savings. In January 2013, the state released a 156-page financing plan for its single-payer arrangement; the plan outlines federal financing sources and the anticipated generation of savings. Vermont has been awarded more than $250 million in federal funding for its state exchange the fifth-highest amount among the states, although Vermont has the country's second-smallest state population. We feel strongly that the exchange is not the answer to all of Vermont's health care problems, Shumlin remarked, explaining that the exchange is helpful to Vermont to bring us federal dollars to achieve our single-payer goal.3 In fact, state exchange development will be 100% federally funded.4
- more -
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2013/april/lessons-from-vermonts-health-care-reform
Section 1332 of the health care law:
State single payer waiver provisions in the Senate healthcare bill - legislative language and fact sheet from Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders
Why the 1332 Waiver in the Senate Health Reform Bill is the Only Opportunity for State Single Payer Systems Under the Bill
The health care reform bill passed by the Senate requires that all states set up Exchanges through which private insurance companies could sell their plans. Because federal laws preempt state laws, the federal health care reform bill would supplant any state attempt to set up a single payer system in lieu of an Exchange, which by its nature calls for multiple payers to compete. If the Senate bill is enacted, the only opportunity for states to move toward a single payer system is found in Section 1332. This section would allow a state with a plan that meets certain coverage and affordability requirements to waive out of the requirement to set up an Exchange for private insurance companies. Only with such a waiver could a state move in the direction of a single payer system.
- more -
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2010/march/state-single-payer-waiver-provisions-in-the-senate-healthcare-bill-legislative-langu
Why the 1332 Waiver in the Senate Health Reform Bill is the Only Opportunity for State Single Payer Systems Under the Bill
The health care reform bill passed by the Senate requires that all states set up Exchanges through which private insurance companies could sell their plans. Because federal laws preempt state laws, the federal health care reform bill would supplant any state attempt to set up a single payer system in lieu of an Exchange, which by its nature calls for multiple payers to compete. If the Senate bill is enacted, the only opportunity for states to move toward a single payer system is found in Section 1332. This section would allow a state with a plan that meets certain coverage and affordability requirements to waive out of the requirement to set up an Exchange for private insurance companies. Only with such a waiver could a state move in the direction of a single payer system.
- more -
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2010/march/state-single-payer-waiver-provisions-in-the-senate-healthcare-bill-legislative-langu
Release: President Endorses State Waiver Proposal
Vermont Delegation and Gov. Shumlin Hail Obama Endorsement of State Health Reform Waiver Legislation
WASHINGTON, Feb. 28 - The Vermont congressional delegation and Gov. Peter Shumlin today hailed President Obama's endorsement of legislation allowing states to provide better health care at a lower cost starting in 2014.
At a meeting of the National Governors Association Monday morning, Obama announced his support for amending the Affordable Care Act to allow states like Vermont to seek a federal waiver to the new law three years earlier than currently allowed. States would be required to design plans that are at least as comprehensive and affordable as the federal model and cover at least as many people
Last month Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) introduced in the Senate and Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) introduced in the House legislation that would advance the date waivers would be accepted from 2017 to 2014. The three joined Gov. Shumlin at a Montpelier press conference to announce the legislation, which would provide Vermont the flexibility it needs to adopt reforms Shumlin is pursuing.
Leahy said, "This is a wise decision that keeps in focus the goal of continually improving health care in America. I applaud President Obama and Secretary Sebelius for supporting efforts by Vermont and other states to go above and beyond what the Affordable Care Act requires. They know that the federal government does not have a monopoly on good ideas, and innovations by the states will prove - and improve --- the benefits of health insurance reform, on the ground, and in practice. While some in Washington want to turn the clock back and repeal the new health reform law, Vermont and other states want to move ahead. Vermont has already been working hard to improve the state's system of health care, and passage of the delegation's waiver bill will move our state one step closer to that goal."
Sanders said, "At a time when 50 million Americans lack health insurance and when the cost of health care continues to soar, it is my strong hope that Vermont will lead the nation in a new direction through a Medicare-for-all, single-payer approach. I am delighted that President Obama announced today that he will, in fact, support allowing states to innovate with health coverage models sooner rather than later. I worked hard to draft and secure the waiver provision in the health reform law and I am very pleased the president now agrees that we should make it available in 2014 as originally intended. While there is a lot of work to be done, I look forward to working with Sens. Leahy, Wyden, Inouye, Brown and others in the Senate and Rep. Welch and others in the House to get this done as soon as possible."
Welch said, "President Obama's support for allowing states to innovate sooner is a good news for Vermont and all states looking to tailor health care reform to individual states' circumstances. This legislation will give Vermont a green light to lead the nation in providing quality health care at a lower cost. I'm hopeful that Democrats and Republicans alike will support this practical step to give states flexibility to achieve progress their own way."
Shumlin said, "I was excited to learn about this today during a visit to the White House. All along officials from Health and Human Services have expressed a willingness to work with us, as long as we don't compromise standards under the law. I think this is an excellent example of how we can work together to control skyrocketing health care costs and implement meaningful health care reform as soon as possible."
A fact sheet on the delegation's "State Leadership in Healthcare Act" is available here.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=44a664de-8e92-43f4-a871-d26e0b5a252d
Vermont Delegation and Gov. Shumlin Hail Obama Endorsement of State Health Reform Waiver Legislation
WASHINGTON, Feb. 28 - The Vermont congressional delegation and Gov. Peter Shumlin today hailed President Obama's endorsement of legislation allowing states to provide better health care at a lower cost starting in 2014.
At a meeting of the National Governors Association Monday morning, Obama announced his support for amending the Affordable Care Act to allow states like Vermont to seek a federal waiver to the new law three years earlier than currently allowed. States would be required to design plans that are at least as comprehensive and affordable as the federal model and cover at least as many people
Last month Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) introduced in the Senate and Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) introduced in the House legislation that would advance the date waivers would be accepted from 2017 to 2014. The three joined Gov. Shumlin at a Montpelier press conference to announce the legislation, which would provide Vermont the flexibility it needs to adopt reforms Shumlin is pursuing.
Leahy said, "This is a wise decision that keeps in focus the goal of continually improving health care in America. I applaud President Obama and Secretary Sebelius for supporting efforts by Vermont and other states to go above and beyond what the Affordable Care Act requires. They know that the federal government does not have a monopoly on good ideas, and innovations by the states will prove - and improve --- the benefits of health insurance reform, on the ground, and in practice. While some in Washington want to turn the clock back and repeal the new health reform law, Vermont and other states want to move ahead. Vermont has already been working hard to improve the state's system of health care, and passage of the delegation's waiver bill will move our state one step closer to that goal."
Sanders said, "At a time when 50 million Americans lack health insurance and when the cost of health care continues to soar, it is my strong hope that Vermont will lead the nation in a new direction through a Medicare-for-all, single-payer approach. I am delighted that President Obama announced today that he will, in fact, support allowing states to innovate with health coverage models sooner rather than later. I worked hard to draft and secure the waiver provision in the health reform law and I am very pleased the president now agrees that we should make it available in 2014 as originally intended. While there is a lot of work to be done, I look forward to working with Sens. Leahy, Wyden, Inouye, Brown and others in the Senate and Rep. Welch and others in the House to get this done as soon as possible."
Welch said, "President Obama's support for allowing states to innovate sooner is a good news for Vermont and all states looking to tailor health care reform to individual states' circumstances. This legislation will give Vermont a green light to lead the nation in providing quality health care at a lower cost. I'm hopeful that Democrats and Republicans alike will support this practical step to give states flexibility to achieve progress their own way."
Shumlin said, "I was excited to learn about this today during a visit to the White House. All along officials from Health and Human Services have expressed a willingness to work with us, as long as we don't compromise standards under the law. I think this is an excellent example of how we can work together to control skyrocketing health care costs and implement meaningful health care reform as soon as possible."
A fact sheet on the delegation's "State Leadership in Healthcare Act" is available here.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=44a664de-8e92-43f4-a871-d26e0b5a252d
FACT SHEET
"State Leadership in Healthcare Act‟
Section 1332 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act the Waiver for State Innovation allows states to waiver out of some of the requirement of federal health reform if they meet certain standards. The provision in the new law was authored by Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and strongly supported by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.).
The Sanders-Leahy-Welch State Leadership in Healthcare Act moves the availability of state waivers from 2017 to 2014. This would allow a state to avoid the expense of setting up an exchange which is otherwise required in every state in 2014 only to dismantle it later.
The federal waiver would allow a state to:
The federal waiver would not allow a state to:
How does the waiver provision of the law work?
Step 1: The state passes a law to provide health insurance to its citizens.
Step 2: The Secretary of Health and Human Services and Secretary of the Treasury review the state law and determine that the plan is:
Step 3: If the federal government finds that the alternative state system meets these requirements without certain federal rules, states can get a waiver. The state plan could receive waivers from:
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/graphics/011411state_waiver_fact_sheet.pdf
"State Leadership in Healthcare Act‟
Section 1332 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act the Waiver for State Innovation allows states to waiver out of some of the requirement of federal health reform if they meet certain standards. The provision in the new law was authored by Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and strongly supported by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.).
The Sanders-Leahy-Welch State Leadership in Healthcare Act moves the availability of state waivers from 2017 to 2014. This would allow a state to avoid the expense of setting up an exchange which is otherwise required in every state in 2014 only to dismantle it later.
The federal waiver would allow a state to:
a) Collect all the federal funding and use for financing coverage for individuals through a plan designed by and for that state.
b) Coordinates this waiver process with Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP waiver processes that may be required depending on the design of the system. The state
The federal waiver would not allow a state to:
a) Offer lower quality or less affordable care to their residents than would be available in the exchange.
b) Obtain waivers from the health insurance market reforms implemented under the law such as those benefiting ending the use of pre-existing conditions to exclude individuals from coverage or those allowing young adults to stay on their parents plans longer.
How does the waiver provision of the law work?
Step 1: The state passes a law to provide health insurance to its citizens.
Step 2: The Secretary of Health and Human Services and Secretary of the Treasury review the state law and determine that the plan is:
a) At least as comprehensive as its residents would receive in the exchange;
b) At least as affordable;
c) Deficit neutral to the federal government; and,
d) Covers at least as many people.
Step 3: If the federal government finds that the alternative state system meets these requirements without certain federal rules, states can get a waiver. The state plan could receive waivers from:
a) The section requiring establishment of the exchange
b) The designs for how federal subsidies would have to reduce premiums and co-pays.
c) The employer penalty for providing coverage
d) The individual mandate.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/graphics/011411state_waiver_fact_sheet.pdf
The Affordable Care Act: Supporting State Innovation
http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2012/02/state-innovation02222012a.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
303 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Seattle's Socialist City Councilor Offers Radical Response to Obama Speech" [View all]
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
OP
'Even on DU'. You know what? Maybe this is what was needed. While we all thought we had
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#71
I shouldn't have to do this, please read the mission statement from the about section.
A Simple Game
Feb 2014
#282
Exelellent post. Then the left will probably have to get organized. Sometimes it takes a while
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#107
Hillary Clinton called herself Progressive before you called yourself that....
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#271
So the Democrats are now completely Socialist...not Socialist Democrats...but just full on
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#77
Never.but I also do not see the Democrat'ic' (because the purity trolls found my typo disconcerting)
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#181
and I replied....trying to "discover" something based on 2 letters is a bit of
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#267
Yeah well you said that ...you know in public where I could see it....not in a private message..
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#278
I have yet to see you express anything liberal. You're a supporter of the President's.
cali
Feb 2014
#258
Yes, well you've been pretty clear about not believing that the 'democrat' party
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#234
Calling for a workers' takeover of Boeing factories is center-right reformism?
DireStrike
Feb 2014
#170
As I recall, she didn't really have that as a part of her electoral platform.......
socialist_n_TN
Feb 2014
#176
We in Workers Power use centrist all the time to describe groups.......
socialist_n_TN
Feb 2014
#194
And why does a new quasi-revolutionary socialist movement need any of the taint of old-school
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#250
Okay, I get that you're not advocating Soviet-style Communism (or faux-Communism, more like).
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#280
FDR was trying to save capitalism by his socialistic reforms, but........
socialist_n_TN
Feb 2014
#197
And I explained in another post in this thread what Lenin and Trotsky meant......
socialist_n_TN
Feb 2014
#222
I accept my Social Security AND Medicare....therefore I...like every other American that does
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2014
#255
Exactly. As I said before, our current hyper-capitalism is just as much as failure as Soviet
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#281
Yesterday on CNN I heard the Prez say once again how he wants to work with the repubs.
CrispyQ
Feb 2014
#93
That's the point, isn't it? They don't want a party that's more Conservative.
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#106
About Half of that 60% Want Whatever the Tee Vee or the Preacherman Tells them to Want
AndyTiedye
Feb 2014
#200
I had been wondering if I should look into the Green Party, but she definitely makes me want to
liberal_at_heart
Jan 2014
#3
Right, because FR wants $15/hr minimum wage, lol. NOTHING like FR. In fact,
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
#27
Actually, I think one WOULD need the level of brain damage FR causes to think that
Scootaloo
Jan 2014
#33
It's alright, Freepers can't tell the difference between socialism and fascism either.
NuclearDem
Jan 2014
#41
Please explain the similarities, or admit that your post is the unsubstantiated bullshit.
last1standing
Feb 2014
#60
Sure because Freepers want "$15 minimum wage, taxing the super-rich to pay for mass transit
cui bono
Feb 2014
#84
Don't expect a response. The cheer squad only reads WH press releases, and they never, ever
Marr
Feb 2014
#101
i agree with you. What President has ever done everything you wanted him to do? With the kind of
kelliekat44
Jan 2014
#20
And as one of the great orators of our day, President Obama would have succeeded.
gLibDem
Feb 2014
#154
It certainly put to rest the question of which constituency Obama represents -
Maedhros
Feb 2014
#273
Obama had a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate for only 24 working days.
SunSeeker
Feb 2014
#158
Dems never employed the filibuster in the unprecedented way the GOP did starting in 2009. nt
SunSeeker
Feb 2014
#183
During the first 6 months was when we had that 24 days of the filibuster proof majority.
SunSeeker
Feb 2014
#211
The Senate's formal rules can only be changed at the start of a two-year Congress.
SunSeeker
Feb 2014
#241
I think the new minimum wage increase push is a good, FDR-style strategy, don't you? nt
SunSeeker
Feb 2014
#242
May I remind you, all he had to do to end the bush tax cuts was nothing, also, he refused to look at
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
#32
Ending the Tax Cuts Would Have Crashed the Economy. Medicare for All Was DOA in the Senate
AndyTiedye
Feb 2014
#193
There is not many people left around here that are not buying into the conventional wisdom.
RC
Feb 2014
#264
The Could Not Have Used that Money for Anything With the GOP in Control of the House
AndyTiedye
Feb 2014
#293
Absolutely agree. After this rant, I have zero respect for the woman. I still support some of her
okaawhatever
Jan 2014
#34
Yeah who can take anyone seriously when they run on "a platform of $15 minimum wage,
cui bono
Feb 2014
#85
But unregulated capitalism is what you get when you allow capitalism........
socialist_n_TN
Feb 2014
#289
Although there are a lot of "Thanks Oba_ma" falsities in her rant, she should try to run nationally
Amonester
Feb 2014
#74
The only problem with voting for someone other than a "democrat" in a major election is something
Victor_c3
Feb 2014
#87
Yep. Even though capitalism isn't mentioned in the constitution, it controls our government.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2014
#153
It's wonderful she can share insights she's gleaned from her long career in government,
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#156
If she wants to organize the working class, let her organize the working class
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#245
The Socialist Party's platform for education rocks. I just went out and checked it out
liberal_at_heart
Feb 2014
#236