Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
96. I think people need to get on the same page with the word "drunk"
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 08:32 PM
Feb 2014

Last edited Wed Feb 12, 2014, 09:36 PM - Edit history (1)

the definition of drunk is being intoxicated to the point you have impairment of physical or mental faculties. If you are intoxicated, but you are both consenting (with your body language, and/or verbally) then it is consensual and not rape. If you change your mind and say no at any time, the other person needs to stop.

It doesn't matter if you are intoxicated, it matters how intoxicated. If you are lucid enough to actively and willingly participate in the encounter, that is considered consent. If you are too incapacitated to actively participate or give verbal consent or denial, you are not able to give consent.

"The law says each of us is responsible for making sure our sexual partners are giving their free consent to what we want to do. The law says you must have a ‘reasonable belief’ that the other person wants to do what you want to do. A reasonable belief is something active. You must go on their body language as well as their words. If in doubt, ask!" *

"Diminished capacity exists when an individual does not have the capacity to consent. Reasons for this inability to consent include, but are not limited to: sleeping, drugged, passed out, unconscious, mentally incapacitated, etc.

It is important to understand diminished capacity because oftentimes victims of sexual assault in these situations blame themselves because they drank, did drugs, etc. It is essential to emphasize that it is not his or her fault, that the aggressor is the one who took advantage of his or her diminished capacity." **

If you ask me, if two people are actively engaging in sex, even while intoxicated, they are giving consent. Actively participating is consent. If only one is, that means the other has diminished capacity to participate or to say yes or no, and therefor it would be wrong to continue it. There is no consent from that party, either physically or verbally.

the information quoted above came from these two links:
* http://www.galop.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Consenting-To-Sex-A4.pdf
** http://www.rainn.org/get-information/types-of-sexual-assault/drug-facilitated-assault

I suggest anyone who is "confused" contact the Rainn.org to get more clarification privately.

Misleading headline ..... oldhippie Feb 2014 #1
Fair point. Fixed. riqster Feb 2014 #4
Read up on this asshole Taranto.... CurtEastPoint Feb 2014 #2
He couldn't get a degree from California State University, Northridge. LOL. jsr Feb 2014 #3
I take it's not like Stanford, eh? CurtEastPoint Feb 2014 #8
Ana Kasparian (The Young Turks) graduated from there alp227 Feb 2014 #9
Translates as: He thought he was 'above' doing corsework Blue_Tires Feb 2014 #29
Nah, basically it means he is a failure that can't make the grades any way. Xyzse Feb 2014 #36
You mean he's a typical Republican? Enthusiast Feb 2014 #86
the headline is absolutely appropriate. firstly... it is what is within the text. so, seabeyond Feb 2014 #5
Here is what the article *actually* said: Nye Bevan Feb 2014 #6
He left the critical bit out: consent. riqster Feb 2014 #7
Sure it is, when alcohol is involved joeglow3 Feb 2014 #11
What a load of misogynistic twaddle. riqster Feb 2014 #16
So, you believe consent CAN be given while drunk? joeglow3 Feb 2014 #18
There are situations where consent cannot be given. riqster Feb 2014 #25
The op/ed seemed to be based on a premise separate from your view joeglow3 Feb 2014 #28
You are missing a central point of the OP. riqster Feb 2014 #33
No, I am not missing a central point joeglow3 Feb 2014 #43
I believe your argument needs back up passiveporcupine Feb 2014 #64
Look in this very thread joeglow3 Feb 2014 #73
Then the word "drunk" is being misused by a lot of people here passiveporcupine Feb 2014 #100
Of course, a person *can* still enter into legally binding contracts while drunk Orrex Feb 2014 #46
do you? noiretextatique Feb 2014 #30
I believe his point is that BOTH are drunk and consenting at the time. 7962 Feb 2014 #38
let me clarify noiretextatique Feb 2014 #42
You failed to address the point joeglow3 Feb 2014 #44
yes noiretextatique Feb 2014 #48
And THAT was the point of the WSJ op/ed joeglow3 Feb 2014 #49
the point was to excuse poor decision-making noiretextatique Feb 2014 #52
It's not quite that cut and dried Orrex Feb 2014 #51
life experience is more realistic than legal screeds noiretextatique Feb 2014 #56
Oh hellz yeah. riqster Feb 2014 #57
Easier? Maybe. Better? Not necessarily. Orrex Feb 2014 #60
"It's much easier not to fuck when either party is drunk, wouldn't you agree?" Rex Feb 2014 #68
Entering the body of someone who is not able to give consent is rape. You seriously don't get this? Squinch Feb 2014 #76
So, my passed out friend is a rapist? joeglow3 Feb 2014 #80
Oh, dear God. You call this an honest discussion? Seriously? Squinch Feb 2014 #81
I was hoping you would say that joeglow3 Feb 2014 #88
Oh, get a grip. Clearly you think you are diabolically clever. And yet you are simply making Squinch Feb 2014 #91
And yet, you didn't define where the fine line is joeglow3 Feb 2014 #102
Because there is no fine line and the suggestion that there is is disgusting. As is this Squinch Feb 2014 #103
The thing is gollygee Feb 2014 #106
no- he has made it quite obvious that he can't tell the difference between rape and sex bettyellen Feb 2014 #124
It is frightening as hell. redqueen Feb 2014 #127
The aggressor is the rapist. How can you seriously post that question??? cui bono Feb 2014 #110
How do you determine who the aggressor is? joeglow3 Feb 2014 #112
But, who raped who? AtheistCrusader Feb 2014 #34
Depends who took advantage of whom. alp227 Feb 2014 #12
Imagine that a male and a female college student get drunk together. Nye Bevan Feb 2014 #22
Both OnlinePoker Feb 2014 #53
Not sure why you would think molesting an unconcious person is possibly okay, ever? It never is. bettyellen Feb 2014 #59
Lot's of people jumping on the bandwagon of that argument. Very scary. Squinch Feb 2014 #78
Unfortunately so. cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #61
Yeah, I tend to read what the person actually wrote. BKH70041 Feb 2014 #77
Slight correction to your epic rant. Stonepounder Feb 2014 #10
Answer me a couple questions joeglow3 Feb 2014 #14
Rape is having sex with someone who does not or cannot consent. riqster Feb 2014 #19
Define "cannot consent" joeglow3 Feb 2014 #21
See post 25. riqster Feb 2014 #26
Yes... noiretextatique Feb 2014 #32
Yes again noiretextatique Feb 2014 #37
You keep responding to the wrong person joeglow3 Feb 2014 #45
Need clarification.... tableturner Feb 2014 #31
easy...do not rape noiretextatique Feb 2014 #39
You didn't answer the questions joeglow3 Feb 2014 #47
i did...if you are an adult noiretextatique Feb 2014 #50
Your decision to now attack my maturity because of a philisophical discussion also speaks volumes joeglow3 Feb 2014 #58
But that's precisely how you are being immature: trying to reduce a complex and painful situation Recursion Feb 2014 #115
it's not a philosphical arguement at all- it is about being incapciateted, which has a legal bettyellen Feb 2014 #126
Please... tableturner Feb 2014 #55
If either partner goes beyond what has been explicitly consented to, they are in the wrong. riqster Feb 2014 #41
So it is possible for both the man and the woman to be guilty of rape for the same incident, right? Nye Bevan Feb 2014 #54
I tell you what: when 1 in 4 college-age men reports unwanted sexual activities by women, we'll talk Recursion Feb 2014 #114
So two drunk people are naked and performing orally on each other..... tableturner Feb 2014 #62
the law centers on the person who acts without receiving consent. SIMPLE. NOT CONFUSING TO MOST. bettyellen Feb 2014 #63
So if they are both drunk, each has orally performed on the other... tableturner Feb 2014 #65
your conclusion" -all sex between drunk people is a crime" is so fucking ridiculous- you obviously bettyellen Feb 2014 #67
About the law..... tableturner Feb 2014 #83
I think people need to get on the same page with the word "drunk" passiveporcupine Feb 2014 #96
What you wrote makes a lot of sense...... tableturner Feb 2014 #109
^This post F4lconF16 Feb 2014 #120
Thank you for this post. redqueen Feb 2014 #128
most here are muddying the water because they PREFER it that way. i explained it's incapacitated bettyellen Feb 2014 #125
not interested in your ridculous hypotheticals or the assumption that people do not understand bettyellen Feb 2014 #123
"tell me this country isn't fucked up." heaven05 Feb 2014 #15
Yep, it's called rape culture BainsBane Feb 2014 #98
????? heaven05 Feb 2014 #13
so my question to you, jimmy boy, is just how many women have you raped while niyad Feb 2014 #17
This is the reason I don't ever have sex with a woman who has been drinking, even a girlfriend. dilby Feb 2014 #20
Liability vs Responsibility Vox Moi Feb 2014 #23
OMG I cant stand those people!!!!!!!!! 7962 Feb 2014 #40
My friend and I drove almost 1,000 miles in Great Britain and never once were we passed on the wrong rhett o rick Feb 2014 #113
Slow left lane drivers are self-centered and oblivioous, at best, and self-righteous jerks in many Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2014 #74
What, exactly, does your unrelated story have to do with this thread? nt redqueen Feb 2014 #130
Hey Redqueen. Nice to hear from you. Vox Moi Feb 2014 #131
Yeah I thought so. Thing is, rapes are not accidents. redqueen Feb 2014 #133
Having a drink is not a crime.. dickthegrouch Feb 2014 #24
Speaking as a 63-year-old man, this is another reason for me to hate the WSJ. radicalliberal Feb 2014 #27
The more I hear about him the less I like him. cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #35
He has a history of being a misogynist in the name of combatting "political correctness". alp227 Feb 2014 #69
Why he sounds like cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #71
Also: His website really is something. Good grief nt cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #72
I have to ask... jmowreader Feb 2014 #66
IMO, it remains valid up until the point one of them says STOP! Rex Feb 2014 #70
it's not drunk- it is incapciatated. and there's lots of info out there regarding the definition of bettyellen Feb 2014 #75
One problem with this line of thinking: Sex is a decision. Xithras Feb 2014 #79
^^^^ This. And the only place I would disagree with you Squinch Feb 2014 #82
I debated that one, but chose to stick with it for clarity. Xithras Feb 2014 #84
No, no offense, and I appreciate the sanity of your post. (An oasis in a pretty insane thread.) Squinch Feb 2014 #87
I agree with everything you posted joeglow3 Feb 2014 #90
That is the catch, isn't it? Xithras Feb 2014 #93
and he finds defenders BainsBane Feb 2014 #85
Yeah, isn't it ever so very shocking? riqster Feb 2014 #89
This thread is chock full of posts making the thinly veiled argument that boils down to, "lots of Squinch Feb 2014 #92
Then when a PSA is directed at men BainsBane Feb 2014 #94
Yes. And when I see people suggesting that plenty of accusations of rape are, effectively, Squinch Feb 2014 #95
It's not too difficult to figure out if a woman wants sex BainsBane Feb 2014 #97
If they think there is some fine line between sex and rape, you have to be right. Squinch Feb 2014 #99
It's like some men fear "accidentally" running afoul of these "very complex" rape laws we have Recursion Feb 2014 #116
Well said BainsBane Feb 2014 #117
Well said BainsBane Feb 2014 #117
I think their confusion comes about because arthritisR_US Feb 2014 #122
That can be a challenge BainsBane Feb 2014 #134
Indeed. More men should use something like the "four step" rule I mentioned above. Xithras Feb 2014 #129
What is the argument? gollygee Feb 2014 #101
They insist it isn't rape BainsBane Feb 2014 #104
Nope. You got it pretty well. The other point being made is that there is just a tiny difference Squinch Feb 2014 #105
On the crazy scale Aerows Feb 2014 #107
Way too many people in this thread saying that they don't know the difference between sex and rape. Squinch Feb 2014 #108
Yep. Sickos. riqster Feb 2014 #111
Remember WSJ is now part of Fox News empire. grahamhgreen Feb 2014 #119
Oh, yes. Stopped reading it for work purposes years ago. riqster Feb 2014 #121
Fuck the WSJ Harmony Blue Feb 2014 #132
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wall Street Journal think...»Reply #96