Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)This is How Citizens United Dies-Feds: Mexican tycoon exploited super PACs to influence US elections [View all]
In the wake of the Citizens United case, critics of the ruling, which lifted prohibitions on direct campaign spending by corporations, raised the prospect of this allowing foreign nationals to influence US elections. Very serious people dismissed this trusting the our "robust" election laws would be up to the task of keeping foreign influence out of US elections. They were dead wrong.
Feds: Mexican tycoon exploited super PACs to influence U.S. elections
In a first of its kind case, federal prosecutors say a Mexican businessman funnelled more than $500,000 into U.S. political races through Super PACs and various shell companies. The alleged financial scheme is the first known instance of a foreign national exploiting the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision in order to influence U.S. elections. If proven, the campaign finance scandal could reshape the public debate over the high court's landmark decision.
Until now, allegations surrounding Jose Susumo Azano Matsura, the owner of multiple construction companies in Mexico, have not spread beyond local news outlets in San Diego, where he's accused of bankrolling a handful of southern California candidates. But the scandal is beginning to attract national interest as it ensnares a U.S. congressman, a Washington, D.C.-based campaign firm and the legacy of one of the most important Supreme Court decisions in a generation.
In a first of its kind case, federal prosecutors say a Mexican businessman funnelled more than $500,000 into U.S. political races through Super PACs and various shell companies. The alleged financial scheme is the first known instance of a foreign national exploiting the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision in order to influence U.S. elections. If proven, the campaign finance scandal could reshape the public debate over the high court's landmark decision.
Until now, allegations surrounding Jose Susumo Azano Matsura, the owner of multiple construction companies in Mexico, have not spread beyond local news outlets in San Diego, where he's accused of bankrolling a handful of southern California candidates. But the scandal is beginning to attract national interest as it ensnares a U.S. congressman, a Washington, D.C.-based campaign firm and the legacy of one of the most important Supreme Court decisions in a generation.
Matsura was able to evade US law by using a shell corporation in order to funnel the donations to US candidates. Pre Citizens United this would have involved finding a large number of US citizens willing to act as straw men. Now these shell games are able to be played by corporations, where determining ownership, let alone citizenship, can be a massive task.
..................
For some critics of the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, the San Diego case validates warnings about foreign contributions previously dismissed by supporters of the landmark court case.
The Rest Of The Story Here:
http://www.standard.net/stories/2014/02/12/feds-mexican-tycoon-exploited-super-pacs-influence-us-elections
and here:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/13/1277252/-This-is-How-Citizens-United-Dies
behind firewall:
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/02/11/feds_mexican_tycoon_used_super_pacs_to_influence_us_elections
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is How Citizens United Dies-Feds: Mexican tycoon exploited super PACs to influence US elections [View all]
kpete
Feb 2014
OP
I like your spirit -- Refreshing counterbalance to my "discouraged old fart" tendencies these days
Armstead
Feb 2014
#8
To say nothing of the trend in certain countries for people to come to the US specifically
JDPriestly
Feb 2014
#41
I am confident this court would say no to corporate speech where foreign nationals are the source
Vattel
Feb 2014
#12
The relevant court remedy would not be a fine but an order that stops the message
Vattel
Feb 2014
#31
You know, I hate to say it but sometimes you have to use people's irrational fears against
okaawhatever
Feb 2014
#6
So what? Why would US based corps. have more of a right to buy election than foreign ones?
Romulox
Feb 2014
#11
That ruling is not consistent with either Citizens or previous Free Speech jurisprudence.
Romulox
Feb 2014
#20
People present in the US have virtually all the rights of citizens. Certainly 1st Amendment rights.
Romulox
Feb 2014
#35
I appreciate the feedback. Wasn't Citizens United about making a movie, though? nt
Romulox
Feb 2014
#38
So it seems anyone legally present in the US can spend unlimited money on such activity. nt
Romulox
Feb 2014
#81
I would also add that it is trivial for a foreign corporation to form a subsidiary in the US. nt
Romulox
Feb 2014
#21
According to this article, it was Alito. This article reflects Roberts' reaction to the issue.
Hassin Bin Sober
Feb 2014
#62
Cons and the tea party type believe it is fine to hide your sources of campaign funding and
Fred Sanders
Feb 2014
#27
We all knew this was going on, it's nice to see the truth rolling out. K & R
Firebrand Gary
Feb 2014
#34
Remember Alito shaking his head and mouthing no when the president brought this up in the sotu
kimbutgar
Feb 2014
#39
Corporations are associations of individuals, therefore have speech rights under the First Amendment
Vox Moi
Feb 2014
#51
Surely the felonious ones could never have dreamed their majority decision opened
indepat
Feb 2014
#66
Aren't they all foreign corporations now, headquartered in the Bahamas or Caymans?
tclambert
Feb 2014
#68